The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Merciless defence against refugees at the Gates of the Empire

Lethal Border Regime. The sealing off of Europe shows its most brutal side in the case of the Spanish exclaves Ceuta und Melilla


13/11/2022

It was the most recent in a long row of incidents, which receive little more attention than the weather report: people die on the border. Again and again this is followed by – nothing. Or, worse, the victims are mocked.

It happened on 24th June: hundreds of victims, of which at least 37 died. According to the Spanish interior ministry, they died as 1,700  attempted to cross the border fence in Melilla.

What does Fernando Grande-Marlaska, the Spanish interior minister from the social democratic PSOE say, three months later? There was a “timely and proportionate use of violence by the Spanish and Moroccan security forces”. He accused the migrants of “trying to enter illegally”, and of showing “extremely violent behaviour”.

Merciless Repression

But an unexpected party said: “470 people were sent back, without observing national and international legislation”. So said the Spanish ombudsman (Defensor del Pueblo) Ángel Gabilondo on 14th October, after reviewing documents of the Spanish ministry of the interior and the ministry for integration, social safety and migration.

Gabilondo is not entirely independent: he was an education minister of the PSOE and also an election candidate for the Madrid region. He was appointed to his post (a constitutional monitor of the Spanish authorities) after his crushing defeat at the local election.

He concluded nevertheless: “The constitutional court has ruled that before people are turned back from the border, every individual must be checked and compliance with international obligations for full judicial control is guaranteed.”

The ombudsman demanded that “the foreign ministry provide the embassies and consulates with material and human resources, so that people who require international protection can visit them and are able to apply for asylum without risking their life or having to enter the country using irregular methods.”

Junge Welt reported that the NGO Spanish Commission for Refugee Help (CEAR) had already described prior statements about the tragedy of 24th June, from the interior minister and prime minister Pedro Sánchez – as “fully unacceptable, when you remember that this joint action caused the death of dozens of people.”

CEAR, founded in 1979, wrote the government tries to particularly emphasize “violence” from the migrants, so that it does not have to speak about the “deep desperation suffered by people like those who tried to cross the fence in order to find protection”.

On 21st September, Enrique Santiago, head of the Spanish Communist Party and Unidas Podemos MP, stated in parliament that Spain must finally enable possible asylum applications, in particular for people from Africa. The justifications by the interior minister reminded him of the discourse of the extreme right.

CEAR also noted that “access to legal assistance and translators” as well as “identifying people who find themselves in a precarious situation and could be advised to apply for asylum” – could not take place.  Since every person was “automatically sent back without having the possibility of identifying themself”.

Estrella Galán, general director of CEAR said: “people from countries South of the Sahara are thus systematically prevented from applying for asylum at the borders.” She asks: “what else can they do but jump over fences or risk their lives on the sea?”

We will see whether the tragedy of 24th June will be atoned. Until now, the Moroccan public prosecutor’s office has simply turned the tables and accused the migrants. This criminalisation again shows the dubious partnership between Morocco one one side, and Spain and the European Union on the other.

Resources flowing from Brussels to Morocco – around 500 million Euros until 2027 – are barely used to integrate asylum seekers, and much more for the ruthless repression of refugees. The relationship between Madrid and Rabat is such that, the weakest party – the migrants – suffer the most.

Strategic Places

Located on the African Mediterranean coast and surrounded by Moroccan territory, Ceuta and Melilla are the only “European” cities with a land border with Africa. Therefore they are a favourite destination for those  fleeing war, dictatorship, famine and climate change, aiming for a better and safer life in Europe.

Since the 17th Century, the Exclave Ceuta has belonged to the kingdom of Spain. The city numbering 85,000 inhabitants, was conquered in the 15th Century by Portugal under John I, following a battle during the Reconquista. In 1668, it was taken over by Spain, after Portugal lost the so called “restoration war”.

Melilla has been owned by Spain since 1497, and numbering 86,500 people, it is a similar size to Ceuta. Neither city are in the Schengen area, posing a big problem for arriving refugees, who find themselves, often for years without a decision on their asylum status. Their legal limbo leaves them neither knowing if they will be deported, or if they will be allowed European entry.

Morocco, a Spanish-French protectorate between 1912 and 1956, considers both cities to be part of its territory. But the Spanish state claims the historic right over the cities for Spain. They are among the poorest places under the Spanish flag. Unemployment has been for decades around 25%. Apart from fishing and shipbuilding, others survive in Melilla through money transfer.

According to Spanish polls, the majority of the population wants to remains in Spain. Not surprising considering the composition of the population. Most people who live in Ceuta were born there, and thus are Spanish citizens. In 2017, this was around 65% of the inhabitants. The remaining 35% includes many Spaniards from other regions.

The second largest ethnic group are people from African countries, in particular from Morocco, which provides 9,500 inhabitants. Melilla’s population distribution is very similar. It remains unclear whether the Spanish government wants to invest part of the EU Reconstruction Fund in both cities because of the conflict with Morocco.

But Morocco uses every opportunity to pursue its claims. In a letter addressed to the UN human rights council, in which Rabat discusses the event on 24th June, the government said that Morocco has “no mutual land border with Spain.” As reported by the news agency Europa Press, you “cannot speak of borders, but merely of a passage” between Melilla and the rest of the country.

Moreover the Moroccan population of both cities has been traditionally disadvantaged. In the early, 1980s, in the course of the Transición after Franco’s death, the Muslim population fought for their rights as Spanish citizens. Until then, the only identification document available to even third generation Muslim inhabitants was a so-called “statistical card” (Tarjeta estadística). Buying a flat was prohibited, neither a general work permit nor health insurance was available. Every journey to the Iberian peninsula, required application for permission. This discrimination was only removed in 1987 after protests.

Both places, in which different cultures have lived together for decades, have a high strategic value for Spain. Sánchez expects that they will be secured by NATO, as he told the summit of the Western war alliance in June in Madrid. This message was unambiguously aimed at Rabat, although Sánchez said, he is eager to pursue a “good partnership” in keeping migrants from reaching Spain, however much it costs.

Shortly after his visit to the Moroccan king Mohammed VI on 7th April this year, the Spanish premier announced a new Western Sahara policy in a letter. This led to a resumption of official diplomatic relations between the two States. With an eye on the autonomy plan for Western Sahara suggested by Morocco, the social democrat spoke in the letter of the “most solid, realistic and credible basis” for a solution of the conflict between Rabat and the Sahrawi independence movement.” This caused great outrage in Spain.

Many including the Spanish Left, regarded these statements as a betrayal of the former Spanish colony Western Sahara. Sánchez’s plans also provoked considerable annoyance from one energy provider. Algeria, which supports the government of Western Sahara in the war against Morocco, suspended relations with Spain.

For decades, Morocco and Western Sahara were at war since Spain withdrew its colonial troops in 1975/76. Morocco, and initially also Mauritania, largely occupied this territory. This was interrupted by a UN-negotiated ceasefire, which offered the Sahrawis a false hope of an independence referendum.

The Spanish press examined events of 17th March 2021 and the following days, when Morocco was not guarding the border to Ceuta. Their judgement Spain was being punished for allowing Brahim Ghali, head of the independence movement Frente Polisario to enter the country, for COVID treatment in a Spanish hospital. Within 48 hours, around 12,000 people crossed the border, mainly young Moroccans looking for work, including quire a few minors.

According to El Periódico de España, Morocco was apparently pursuing a new migration strategy  for Melilla. With the renewed opening of the iron ore mines in the mountains of Uixán/Iksane on the border with Melilla, the caves in which migrants had stayed in the past were cleared out.

The paper affirmed that in September, Moroccan armed forces had burned the tents of migrants. Reports from migrants and NGOs show that this is not a new approach, which includes regular baton attacks.

Fatalities again and again

Spain was shamefully, a European pioneer in the isolation of migrants. Already in the 1990s, Madrid had no other answer to refugees than militarisation. The root causes of this “problem” lie in the West.

In 1996, the Spanish army built an approximately 8 kilometre long wall around Ceuta. One year before, it put up barbed wire, to prevent migrants entering Spain and Europe. Three years later, the enclosure was extended. The Tageszeitung and El Pais reported then, the European Union subsidized the project with three million Euros.

Ten metres high and with three protective walls, the bulwark was equipped with NATO barbed wire. This is furnished with sharp blades, which led to many serious injuries. After persistent protests, the incumbent government dismantled the NATO barbed wire in 2019.

The fence around Melilla was erected by the government of José María Aznar in 1998. The social democratic government under Luis Rodríguez Zapatero augmented the barbed wire with sharp blades. While these were removed in 2003, they were re-fitted in 2017, before they disappeared in 2019. The twelve kilometre long double protective wall has cameras and motion detectors.

In the last quarter century, both facilities experienced “accidents” and “incidents”, euphemistically called. In September 2005, several hundred people in Ceuta tried to cross the fence. Five died, two from gunshots. More than one hundred were injured. At the time, El Mundo reported that an autopsy on Spanish soil revealed that the ammunition used was not officially used by the Spanish police.

In October of the same year, hundreds of people tried to cross the fence – this time in Melilla. Once more, they were shot at, and six died, said El País. The authorities spoke of self-defence, against the migrants carrying sticks and throwing stones at police.

According to victim statements, following this the Moroccan police packed 700 people into buses, and left them in the desert South of the city of Oujda – without food or water. Around 70 people were deported to Morocco, which was previously Spanish territory.

El País wrote: “The first migrants, who after crossing the fence in Melilla, had to return to Morocco, were 70 people from the Sahel state Mali.. afflicted by a plague of locusts in 2004.” An illegal deportation into a third country. One year later, both Amnesty International and Doctors of the World sharply criticized the Moroccan government for this “deportation into the desert”. In 2010 three more people died trying to cross the fence in Melilla.

On 6th February 2014, the man made “tragedy” reached a new peak: at least 15 migrants died and dozens were injured on the El Tarajal beach in Ceuta. They had been  attacked in the water by the paramilitary Guardia Civil with batons, tear gas and rubber bullets. The Guardia Civil denied this.

Around 400 people attempted to swim to Spanish territory. Twenty-three refugees were returned to Morocco without any examination. The human rights organisation European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) supports the victims of this pushback. “The behaviour of the Guardia civil was unlawful according to both Spanish and European law”, wrote ECCHR.

Nevertheless, investigations were stopped at least three times, and no survivor was called as a witness. Moreover the investigation magistrate ordered “a hearing for the Guardia civil servants about deaths by gross negligence and failure to render assistance.” This hearing still has not taken place.

The construction of the border fortifications in Ceuta and Melilla has substantially increased the number of refugees drowning in the Straits of Gibraltar, and not stopped migration. Until 2017, the Spanish interior ministry has spent 258 million Euros to militarise the border. A further 742 million Euros flowed to Spain from Frontex, the European agency for protecting borders and coasts. Large corporations like Indra and Ferrovial have also been paid to build bulwarks.

But the work of the Guardia Civil has “not been made any easier” by the fence from Ceuta and Melilla, as a worker for the NGO Fundación por Causa wrote  for El Salto. Officials were in a quandary: the lack of legal paths for migrants on the one hand, and the desperation of those trying to cross the fence, led to violent situations. Many were haunted by depression.

Even the former foreign minister José Manuel García-Margallo conceded that ultimately, they are witnesses and actors at one of the most heavily guarded and unjust borders of the world.

Anonymous Graves

The border between Morocco and the European Union is the deadliest border for refugees on the entire planet. The fences were only the first measure, control of the waters followed. This means that those desperately fleeing misery dare the even more dangerous route across the Atlantic.

It is estimated that in every year since 2014, around 4,00 people have drowned during transit. In 2021, according to the NGO Caminando Fronteras, it was 4,404 people. The numbers are so exact because the NGO has set up a telephone for people in distress. Among the dead from 21 different countries, were 205 children last year.

The sheer horror tales place again and again. In May 2021, a boat was on the high seas for up to 22 days, when found 500 kilometres from the island El Hierro. On board were 17 dead, starved and dehydrated. Two children and one woman survived.

The media portal El Diaria reported the funeral. The dead were buried in the cemetery San Francisco de Igueste on Tenerife. On the burial niches were written three-digit numbers, no names. The burial was attended by two graveyard workers and a young man from Senegal who a few months earlier had arrived in a similar boat. The dead were not buried for a month because the local mortuary was overflowing. It is unclear whether family members know their fate. A project by the Red Cross attempts to find the names of the dead since last year.

Caminando Fronteras reports that after the events of 24th June in Melilla, the dead were buried in mass graves on the Moroccan side. Helena Maleno Garzón, the chairwoman of the NGO, who has worked for a long time in Morocco and been harassed by the Spanish and Moroccan authorities, has spent years denouncing the inhumane isolationist policy. Both Spanish officials and Frontex workers handed over a dossier about her to Moroccan judiciary. The helper is criminalized just as much as the refugees.

Until June this year, a verifiable number of 978 people have died trying to reach Spanish territory. It is estimated that around five die every day, including those who try to reach the Canary Islands. In 2017, the NGO Fondación Pro Causa calculated deaths on the flight to Spain via Morocco up until the late 1990s. For a good 20 years since the Transición, this came to less than 200 people.

Most migrants who now die, and whose corpses are found are not identified, their families are not informed, there is no burial ceremony. They are buried anonymously, in the cemeteries of Ceuta and Melilla, or in Andalusia and the Canaries, which contains the largest cemeteries for the Mediterranean and the Atlantic. They are given the reference “immigrant from Morocco” or “died on the run.” The corpses of more than 80 per cent of the dead are not found.

Clearly they count for little. This death toll does not result in a change of course – quite the reverse. The EU continues to adorn itself with its Nobel Peace Prize, transfer more money to its doorman Morocco and militarise the border even more strongly.

Meanwhile, those who are threatened with persecution and poverty do not receive the slightest chance of an asylum procedure. The doors remain shut to all those whose mistake is that they were born in the wrong part of the world.

This article first appeared in German in the junge Welt. Translation: Phil Butland. Reproduced with permission

Photo Gallery: Rally for the Release of all Political Prisoners in the Middle East

Saturday, November 12th. Oranienplatz, Berlin

Splits in the German Capitalist Class – Ampel Coalition Members at War

Economic downturn is intensifying competition between German industrialists aligned with China and the US


12/11/2022

Last year in discussing Merkel’s retirement I wrote that: “In the dynamic of 21st century capitalism, under Merkel Germany has tried to ride several horses. But the increasingly tense race between USA and Chinese imperialism, will likely force Merkel’s heirs to be clearer about opposing US imperialism.”

Since the Russian neo-imperialist attack on Ukraine, the confrontation between USA imperialism and the bloc of Chinese-Russian imperialism, has split the German capitalist class. That class which is at the center of the EU is pivotal for the USA to influence, or should we say ‘control’. We can highlight three particular instances where this division became evident below.

The two opposed blocks are quite clear – one led by the Greens (especially Federal Economics minister Robert Habeck and Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock) and the FDP, favour a more overt partnership with (or subservience to) American imperialism. This means burning bridges with China. This block also aims to tie the EU to the USA’s apron strings. Opposing them is the majority of the SPD led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who wishes to maintain economic links with China. This would enable markets for German capital and ultimately to maintain an independence of the demands of US imperialism.

This battle between the two blocks unfolded during the Russian imperialist war against Ukraine. The blocks take according positions on this war. The more bellicose Greens wish to ramp up further arms shipments to Ukraine. In contrast the SPD tries to adopt a more ‘cautious’ policy, while acquiescing in military build-up and verbally condemning Russia. But the war aspects of this needs a separate discussion. Here I focus only discuss specific recent events.

The Nord Stream Affair

On 26 September 2022, a series of explosions hit the Nord Stream pipelines – both 1 and 2 – crossing the Baltic Sea, which led to major leaks of the natural gas. More importantly they blew holes that allowed salt water to enter destroying any potential to be ever used. These pipelines were majority owned by the Russian state company Gazprom. A map of the pipeline course and a blow-by-blow dating is in Der Speigel.

This happened in the territorial waters of Sweden and Denmark – off the island of Bornholm. These countries wrote to the UN that “several hundred kilograms” of explosives had damaged the pipes.” (New York Times; Oct. 25, 2022). All observers accept a deliberate intentional sabotage. However while Denmark, Sweden and Germany have launched investigations, these are fractured and separate. Sweden refused a joint investigation as the matter was “too sensitive”.

Those countries refuse to discuss reports of recent USA and NATO warcraft activity near Bornholm. Yet between August to September 22 a US fleet – “the largest US naval battle group since the cold war ended” – was cruising through the Baltic Sea, and the USS Kearsage reconnoitered around Bornholm.

Three plausible perpetrators are implicated: “Was it the Russians trying to rattle the West, the Americans trying to sever a Russian economic artery or possibly the Ukrainians trying to take revenge on Russia? — what is known remains as cloudy.”

But the ‘Baltic Pipe’ – carrying Norwegian gas to Poland – was unaffected. Had Russia been involved, this was a much more likely target. As for the Ukranian hypothesis, this would only further exacerbate potential European gas shortages, and was unlikely to endear Ukraine to its European allies. It seems far more plausible that the USA was responsible.

The USA had long argued vehemently against the Nordstream pipelines. Under Chancellor Merkel, the German Government enabled the deal with Russia. It was with considerable reluctance the USA appeared to acquiesce. Therefore a natural question, as Der Speigel puts it, is: “Did the USA, as immediately discussed in many voices on Twitter, kill the pipeline project, which has always been unloved?”

The very probable USA ownership of the sabotage is shown by the following. Firstly as reported first by Der Spiegel on 27 September: “The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had weeks ago warned Germany about possible attacks on gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea… The German government received the CIA tip in summer.”

Secondly, three very open statements of US President Joe Biden, his top State Department official Victoria Nuland before the explosions, and those of his Secretary of State Antony Blinken after the explosion – leave little doubt.

In February 8th 2022, Biden threatened to “bring an end to it (the Nord Stream pipelines) if “Russia invades””. Victoria Nuland echoed those remarks.

As Russia launched the formal war, it began limiting energy flow via the older Nordstream 1, forcing immediate energy crunches on Europe. Oil and gas industrialists in the USA exulted as their profits soared (see also Ukraine and the Profits of War).

Immediately after the mysterious explosions, the smug Blinken posed as the savior of Europe, saying: “We’ve significantly increased our production as well as making available to Europe liquefied natural gas.  And we’re now the leading supplier of LNG to Europe … We’ve worked to release oil from our Strategic Petroleum Reserve to make sure as well that there is oil on the markets and to help keep prices down….Ultimately this is also a tremendous opportunity.  It’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove the dependence on Russian energy …That’s very significant and that offers tremendous strategic opportunity for the years to come.”

“The U.S. Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, did not accuse Russia and instead said it was in “no one’s interest” to destroy Nord Stream 1 and 2. “The United States and NATO/EU seem remarkably relaxed about sabotage of a piece of critical infrastructure,” reported an oil and gas reporter for Reuters. Or, as Michael Shellenberger reported: “NS 1 and 2 were not delivering gas. But there is an important precedent/principle. Lack of high-profile response from Washington, London and Brussels itself an important story.”

Finally Europeans in the know are well aware of the real identity of the saboteurs. Radek Sikorski, Polish European MP and former Polish Defense Minister and Deputy Minister of Foregin Affairs blurted out a tweet: “An online debate erupted between senior Polish officials over who is responsible for the destruction… Sikorski, attributed to the United States the sabotage. “Thank you, USA,” Sikorski wrote on Twitter.”

President Putin of Russia recently again dangled the carrot of re-opening the supply of gas through the Nordstream 2 pipeline, finished last year at a cost of $US 11 billion. “Mr. Putin told an energy conference in Russia that delivering natural gas to Europe through the remaining strand of Nord Stream 2 would be a matter of “just turning on the tap.”

But that is unlikely. Warfare now includes the sensitive sea beds of the world, where the “US Senate’s failure to ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea” – gives it free rein.

German Industrial expansions in China versus the USA

There are two separate groups of industrialists in Germany, mirrored by their political representatives. The two opposing directions being pursued are either pro-China or pro-USA. Ultimately, both blocks propose moving production in significant measure to either China or to the USA. For example, the CEO of BASF Germany Martin Brudermuller confirmed:

‘BASF Germany … recently announced that it was intending to “downsize “permanently” in Europe, with high energy costs making the region increasingly uncompetitive. The statement from the world’s largest chemicals group by revenue came after it opened the first part of its new €10bn plastics engineering facility in China a month ago, which it said would support growing demand in the country. “The European chemical market has been growing only weakly for about a decade [and] the significant increase in natural gas and power prices over the course of this year is putting pressure on chemical value chains.”’

Olaf Scholz made his position clear in an opinion piece for “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” on the eve of leading a major business delegation to China. Scholz rejected any “decoupling” of relations with China. The business trip was continually undermined by loud criticism from the Green-FDP elements of the Traffic-light Coalition. But Scholz’s position reflects a dominant strand in German capital, which wants access to the large market of China. In recent years this has expanded:

“In the first half of 2022, German companies’ direct investment in China hit a record high, surpassing… tens of billions of euros, according to… the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin)… This is proved by intensive investments by German enterprises in China. … BASF inaugurated the first plant .. on September 6 in South China’s Guangdong Province…. German auto parts manufacturer Hella announced in July that it will expand capacity in China and open a new lighting plant in Changzhou. Robert Bosch Venture Capital GmbH, a subsidiary of Bosch Group, announced in June that it will set up a new fund of 250 million euros for start-ups in China.”

Meanwhile the opposing and thus far smaller, pole of German capital, plans branch plants in the USA, tempted by investment funds and the lure of cheap energy:

“German companies are expanding their presence in the United States – at the growing expense of production sites in Germany… huge investment programs in the USA… economic stimulus measures, some in the triple-digit billions, to induce German companies to set up production sites in the United States…. the Northvolt company is considering suspending its plans to build a battery factory in northern Germany and instead to build a plant in North America. At the same time, the existence of energy-intensive industries is being jeopardized in Germany… The threat of their relocation abroad – particularly to the USA, where energy prices are significantly lower – is tangible.”

US and China Aligned Wings of German Capital

Meanwhile ‘Green’ Habeck tries to obstruct pro-Chinese moves of German capital: “Habeck’s economy ministry refused to extend Volkswagen’s investment guarantees for China, citing the repression of Muslim Uyghurs in the western region of Xinjiang. The ministry is now working on plans to cap the number of such guarantees for China.“

The pro-USA camp tried blocking China’s acquisition of port facilities in Hamburg. This is where Scholz hails from politically: “The Chinese shipping company COSCO’s acquisition of a stake in a terminal in the port of Hamburg, agreed upon last year, was approved last week only with certain restrictions. Federal ministers from the FDP and Greens had done their best to prevent it.”

In the event, Habeck was only able to reduce the acquisition of the stake to a minority position. But this of itself was welcomed by the USA.

Moreover in the strategically important sector of semi-conductors and chips, initially it seemed as if the German firm Elmos, was to be taken over by a Swedish company Silex –owned by Chinese semiconductor group Sai Microelectronics. While apparently approved, now Habeck has vetoed it.

Conclusion

We do not weep for either factional block of German capital. However we do argue that this is the prelude to the coming inter-imperialist war. While this many still be years off, all these manouevres are intensifying. Only a genuine workers party in as many of the countries driving the re-division of the world will help. Parties masquerading as “Green” or “Social-Democrat Socialists” – or indeed parties masquerading as “Marxist-Leninist” as in China – are simply covers for differing sections of imperialists.

I was in El-Sisi’s jails. This horror must stop

As world leaders meet in the COP27 summit in Sharm-El-Sheikh, we must remember the female political prisoners languishing in Eygpt’s jails.


10/11/2022

My name is Basma Mostafa, an Egyptian investigative journalist, I live in exile, and because I am a woman who has been imprisoned three times in Egypt, today I would like to talk about of women’s conditions in Egyptian prisons.

If you are an Egyptian woman working as a journalist, lawyer, researcher or activist, you will be in jail some day.

if you have a brother, father or husband who is a political prisoner, you will be in jail someday, The Egyptian regime even kidnaps women who do not have political activity, and puts them into jail to force their relatives who have political activity to go to the police, something like a war hostage, like what happened with Aisha Al-sharer the daughter of a leader of the Muslim brotherhood.

If you’re just dancing on Tik Tok, that’s reason enough for the Egyptian regime, to arrest you like Mawadda Al-Adham and Haneen Hosam who are now serving a three-year sentence in prison, just because they dance.

As a journalist, I was documenting prison conditions through my journalistic work, until I experienced it, I can confirm to everyone listen now that the prison in Egypt is inhumane and the 4 days I lived them inside it for me is mean four years.

Prison cells always contain more people than their capacity. There aren’t not enough beds for us because of the overcrowding numbers, and even the available beds are made of iron and women are exposed to many back pains because of it, and whoever doesn’t not have a bed, they sleeps on the floor!

I slept on the floor under the guard’s bed, because there was no space in the tiny cell for me.

The windows of the cell are made of iron and covered with plastic wire and because of this women always suffering from poor ventilation, and bad smell which causes chest diseases and cases of suffocation.

The prison cell has lack of hygiene, which means spread of insects and skin diseases. Even The prison does not provide us cleaning tools, and we have to buy them at double their price from the prison market.

The prison bathrooms do not accommodate all of us because of overcrowding, which forces us to wait for long time up to two or three hours just to use the bathroom. in addition the bathrooms is very dirty, And the poorest female prisoners are forced to clean it for a small amount of money for sending it to her children. Otherwise Female prisoners in solitary cells haven’t bathrooms and must defecate in a “bucket” inside their enclosure cell.

For taking a shower inside the cell, first we have to takes the cell guards permission . For example, on my first day, they refused to take a shower, and they allowed me on my third day.

Inside the prison, they took our clothes from us and gave us unclean clothes. For example, they gave me clothes that smelled very bad and was unclean, as if it had been used before. When I refused to wear it and asked for new clothes, they forced to wear it, As a kind of oppression.

When we arrived at the prison at the first night, we are subjected naked inspection, they force us to take off our clothes and examine our body parts, including virginity and vaginal examinations, in addition to verbal insults and sexual harassment.

Here we must mention that the first person allowed virginity examination was the dictator Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi in 2011 when he was head of Military Intelligence. that’s happened immediately after the revolution, 18 women were placed in military custody, beaten, electrocuted, and subjected to naked inspections . They were photographed by male soldiers, and then subjected to “virginity examinations.”

Women Political prisoners are deprived of talking to other women, especially criminals, and if that happens, We receive a punishment, like taken to the solitary cells, prevented from going out for 20-minute sports, or prevented from family visiting or any other kinds of torture and oppression, and humiliation.

In prison we are forced to wear the hijab, even if we don’t wear it before, I am not wearing hijab and since my first day in prison they have been forcing me to put the hijab.

There is no medical care, especially none that takes into account the physical needs of women; There are no pads for our periods, and even pregnant prisoners have to give birth to their children in prison, and their children must stay with them in prison until they reach 2 years, On my first day in the cell, when I was pregnant, I saw babies all around me and this is the biggest shock I subjected to in my life, and because of it, I couldn’t imagine mySelf being pregnant again.

Egypt does not have special places of detention for transgender women, and they are placed in men’s prisons, where they are vulnerable to sexual assault, and we have documented cases of that.

I call the Egyptian regime to release all women political prisoners, the translator Marwa Arafa, the lawyer Hoda Abdel Moneim, the activist Nermin Hussein, Mawaddah Al-Adham, Haneen Hosam, Aisha Al Shater, the journalist Manal Ajrama, the journalist Hala Fahmey, Hasiba Mahsoub, and every imprisoned woman we don’t know her name.

This is the text of a speech given by Basma at the LINKE rally against Greenwashing the COP27 summit on 8th November 2022

News from Berlin and Germany, 10th November 2022

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Sensors in the underground tunnel

Once a neighboring high-rise construction project had a negative impact on the tunnel, one track had to be closed at the Alexanderplatz underground station. Now it has become known that not only the U2 is under observation, but also the two other underground lines in this part of Mitte are being monitored. Sensors in the area reported the structure with the U2 station was moving. Such movement can lead to cracks in the structure. What about the U5 and U8? So far, no critical settlements or heave have been detected on the U5. This also applies to the measuring system at the U8 station Jannowitzbrücke. Source: Berliner Zeitung

Bundestag election to be repeated in 431 constituencies in Berlin

Due to numerous glitches in the elections in Berlin in September 2021, the Bundestag election is to be repeated in 431 of around 2,300 voting districts. This has been proposed by the parliament’s electoral review committee. The parliament’s approval is considered certain. Berlin has already set a date for the repeat election in February 2023. Recently, however, an expert report by the Senate’s internal administration revealed reservations – according to this report, the authority is convinced that the decision on the repeat election would first have to be confirmed by the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe. Source: rbb

9-Euro Social Ticket until the end of 2023

The Senate decided to reduce the sales price for the Berlin social ticket from 27.50 euros per month to 9 euros from 1 January 2023 to 31 March 2023, following a proposal by Social Affairs Senator Katja Kipping. “All Berliners with a Berlin pass will benefit from the 9-euro social ticket. This is a concrete and noticeable relief for people with little money who are particularly affected by the crisis. We, the Left Party, have been campaigning for this for a long time.°, explained the chairpersons of the Left Party in Berlin, Anne Helm and Carsten Schatz, as well as the spokesperson for mobility policy, Kristian Ronneburg. Source: Linksfraktion Berlin

Flat evictions in Berlin have not decreased

In Berlin, the number of flat evictions has remained almost stable despite calls for judicial leniency – for the current year there are even indications that it could be higher. Actual evictions have only been fully recorded statistically since the fourth quarter of 2019. At that time, 594 Berlin flats were evicted following a judgement. In the first half of 2022, 914 flats are now already affected. Last month, Senator Lena Kreck and Social Affairs Senator Katja Kipping (both Left Party) publicly called for a moratorium on evictions in October. The German Judges’ Association rejected the appeal as inadmissible political influence. Source: tagesspiegel

 

 

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Gas price brake may come sooner

The federal and state governments have reached an agreement on the gas and electricity price brake. Gas prices are to be at twelve cents per kilowatt hour, electricity prices at 40 cents, said Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD). This will now be implemented together with other regulations. The resolution paper of the federal-state summit states the gas price brake will be “introduced on 1 March 2023” as proposed by the Gas Price Commission. However, “a retroactive effect to 1 February 2023 is being sought”. Agreements were also reached on the financing of the 49-Euro-Ticket and the support of the States and Municipalities in providing for refugees. Source: dw

Online retailer wants to take over 47 Galeria locations – Cottbus shop on list

The online retailer Buero.de wants to take over 47 branches of the department stores’ chain Galeria Karstadt Kaufhof in Germany, says its managing director, Markus Schön. The prospective buyer has made a corresponding offer to the insolvency administrator. The Cottbus branch is the only one from Brandenburg on the list of 47 locations. Currently it is not foreseeable when a transaction might take place. In any case, Buero.de is quickly ready to act. Should Buero.de win the bid to buy 47 Galeria shops, they would no longer be run under that name. Source: rbb

Lindner wants fracking in Germany, and geologists are for it

Finance Minister Christian Lindner is tired with the talking about extending the lifespan of nuclear power plants. What the FDP leader is suddenly keen on, however: fracking gas “made in Germany”. According to the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Resources, Germany has 2.3 trillion cubic metres of shale gas, the fourth largest resource within the EU after France, Spain and Romania. And Lindner´s party is not alone in its initiative: the Professional Association of German Geoscientists also advocates German fracked gas. On the other side, parties such as SPD and environmentalists criticize the alternative. Source: Berliner Zeitung

Mehr Demokratie” welcomes lowering of voting age at state level

Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania is the sixth federal state in which 16- and 17-year-olds are now allowed to vote for the state parliament. In April, the Green-Black-governed state of Baden-Württemberg passed a corresponding constitutional amendment. “In NRW, the CDU and the Greens have written the voting age of 16 into the coalition agreement.” In Berlin, too, a constitutional amendment is pending, but it is now delayed by the rerun of the elections. The association “Mehr Demokratie” in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, welcomes this measure as a correct and necessary step and calls for a reform also on the federal level. Source: mehr demokatie