The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Greece. One Year After the Conviction of Golden Dawn, the Struggle Continues

The continuing crisis in Greece and the failures of the New Democracy government have caused Nazi violence to rise. But anti-Nazis are still vigilant.


11/10/2021

October 7th marked one year since the historic verdict which sent the leadership and cadres of Nazi Golden Dawn (GD) to jail, and ruled that the entire party is but a criminal organization disguised as a legitimate political party. As written on this webpage, it was “a clear victory for the anti-fascist and anti-racist movement, but the struggle still goes on”. This seems to be correct, as approaching the anniversary it became clear that Greek society is deeply polarized, socially and politically.

The events in Thessaloniki…

Let’s take the facts: September 17th, 8 years after the murder of anti-Nazi rapper Pavlos Fyssas by GD thugs, saw a powerful demonstration in his neighborhood, Keratsini, commemorating Pavlos and all the victims of fascist and racist violence and supporting refugees and immigrants. Anti-racist organizations had already announced various mobilizations to take place between October 7th and 10th in order to celebrate the victory over GD. At the same time, the remnants of the criminal organization, tiny (but armed and dangerous) fractions made an effort to take the streets.

On September 22nd, students leafleting outside the Technical Secondary School in Stavroupoli, a suburb at the west of Thessaloniki ,were brutally attacked by a group of Nazis calling themselves “The Sacred Band”, armed with knives and sticks. An anti-fascist protest called outside the school, one week after this attack, by university associations was met with unprecedented violence by the Nazis, who escalated with Molotov cocktails, sticks and stones. Two students were hurt.

This sparked an anti-fascist outburst across Thessaloniki, as trade unions (including teachers, and food delivery workers), anti-racist organizations and political parties of the left condemned Nazi violence and called for resistance to the menace, both in the schools and in the streets. On the 29th of September, a massive protest was organized at the central square of Stavroupoli, where 4000 protesters denounced the Nazis and defended the students.

This was a critical moment. The Golden Dawn webpage rushed to declare support “to the school students who resist Marxists and communists”. At the same time the Ministry of Education issued a shameful statement, claiming that there is an issue of “extremes” in the schools, which has to be managed and criticizing the teachers as incapable of imposing law and order!

The answer came from the local teachers union (ELME), which denounced the ministry during a press-conference they gave outside the school on October 1st, and announced that the 7th of October would be a day dedicated to anti-Nazi activity in all schools.

The following days saw an effort of the “Sacred Band” to re-locate their focus to the near-by neighborhood of Evosmos, only to find themselves isolated by new anti-fascist demonstrations. Losing the battle of the streets, what they finally did, was to corner a group of Communist Party (KKE) members, who were leafleting in another area (Ilioupoli) the following day and attack them, injuring one of them, before some passers-by noticed and chased them out of the place.

…and in Athens

The same day, Sunday, another tiny group of Nazi thugs, namely “Pro-Patria” attacked KEERFA members (Movement United against Fascism and the Fascist Threat), this time in Athens at the neighborhood of Neo Iraklio, while the latter were preparing a local open meeting on the GD defeat anniversary. The attack was of a military type as well: A gang of fifteen thugs beat 4 KEERFA members, sending 2 of them to hospital, then tried to open a banner with the slogan “Anti-Antifa”(!) and grab the microphone, without success.

Calling for solidarity to the anti-fascists, the neighborhood rushed to show solidarity and stopped them. Police forces showed up 20 minutes later, confessing that they had orders “not to get involved in any fights”. Nevertheless, because of the immediate mobilization, the leader of the gang was arrested a few hours later and brought to court for assault! The meeting finally took place.

Following all these provocations, one can figure that the mobilizations planned on October 7th outside the court and on October 9th in the center of Athens and in several other cities were massive and successful, despite repression by the police. This time it was the riot police who did the dirty work. I was at Saturday’s demo, organized by KEERFA in central Athens and I witnessed unexpected assaults with teargas against activists and refugees who had come with their little children to the demonstration! But they could not stop us from holding the speeches and then marching to Parliament.

Are the Nazis back?

Following the events, it is reasonable to consider that there is a comeback of the Nazis on the Greek political stage. The threat is obvious, as all conditions are still here: Greece is deeply indebted since the austerity (aka stabilization) programs of 2010-15 and, despite payment extensions because of the COVID crisis, it is hard to conceal that the economy is in trouble. Stagflation is here, prices are soaring and the bosses demand more sacrifices.

The government of New Democracy has given everything to the capitalists. For the first time since being elected prime minister, Kyriakos Mitsotakis and his cabinet, which includes three (not so) redeemed far-right ministers, do not enjoy acceptance in the polls. On the contrary there is open discontent and resistance all over the country; here lies the cause of polarization.

Salaries are stagnating and the unemployment rate is one of the highest in Europe, but Greece is buying “Rafale” airplanes and frigate battleships and playing the racist card against immigrants and refugees. Greek border police, in collaboration with the notorious Frontex, have faced confirmed accusations of kidnapping and pushing refugees back to drown in the Aegean Sea. The government is building new camp-prisons, exclusively for refugees! This is the perfect racist fuel, it has assisted the Nazis in coming out of their isolation and demanding space in the streets and neighborhoods. They want to profit from political crises, nevertheless this is not 2013.

It is vital to see that since the convictions of the leaders of Golden Dawn, and despite the juridical system being soft on them (some have already been out of jail on parole), Nazi groups have been fractured and marginalized. It’s the nationalist and racist policies of the government of New Democracy that help them find supporters in the right wing audience.

Narratives like the “theory of the two extremes” (implying far-right VS far-left) have been engaged by the mainstream media against the anti-fascist movement. So far it has not worked. Trade unions, anti-fascist organizations, left parties, despite their differences have managed to stand in solidarity with each other, defend democracy and stop the menace.

This is no time for complacency, but for intensifying the political struggle against racist politics, prison camps and the policies of the government of New Democracy which pave the way for the Nazis.

The people of Berlin have spoken: it’s time for expropriation!

The referendum on the expropriation of large real estate companies exceeds expectations and achieves a large majority with a historic turnout.

It was a long election night in Berlin on the 26th of September. There were four simultaneous elections: to the Bundestag, to the Abgeordnetenhaus (Berlin Chamber of Deputies), to the district councils and also the referendum Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen (DWE). The latter aims to expropriate and socialise the homes of those real estate companies that own more than 3,000 units, meaning the socialisation of some 240,000 homes across Berlin into public hands. During the count, the last data to be published were those of the referendum. The first results and the first estimates made the activists jump out of their chairs: the referendum obtained broad support, which was confirmed as the hours went by, while a historic turnout (75%) gave the referendum a strong legitimacy.

The final result was 59.1% support for the referendum on the valid vote (56.4% counting the invalid vote) and 40.9% against (39% with the invalid vote). The message of more than one million Berliners was clear. It is time to expropriate the big real estate companies, socialise housing and return it to public hands, stopping the real estate and financial capital that has plundered Berlin in the last decades.

This result does not take into account that almost a quarter of Berlin’s adult population, could not vote. That is those without German nationality, but who are particularly unprotected from a predatory market due to their precarious situation, and are especially discriminated against in the housing market with xenophobic and racist practices. In this sense, within DWE, the group ‘Right to the City’ for all has managed to involve and mobilise a part of the population that was on the margins of the campaign. This was the migrant communities who often do not feel they are appealed to. They now demanded both the right to housing for all and the right to vote for all. Because fair socialisation cannot happen without the support of a quarter of the population.

What next?

However, the referendum is non-binding and therefore depends on the will of the deputies sitting in the Abgeordnetenhaus and the new Berlin government. That will emerge from the negotiations to implement and enforce the referendum. The Berlin elections resulted in a Social Democratic victory for the SPD (21.4%), several points ahead of the Greens (18.9%) and the Christian Democrats of the CDU (18.1%). Behind – Die Linke, the left, with 14% and far behind, the far-right AfD (8%) and the liberals of the FDP (7.2%). The political chessboard forces a tripartite government, or at least a three-way negotiation to form a government (even if one of the actors in the negotiation later decides not to enter the government).

In this context, the SPD is piloting these negotiations with a candidate for mayor, Franziska Giffey. who had already in the campaign refused to expropriate the real estate companies regardless of the result. But who after the DWE’s resounding victory and internal pressure in her party, she has had to moderate her words and speaks of respecting the referendum, albeit in a vague way. The Greens will be a certain travelling companion in this new government. During the campaign, they showed reserved support for DWE, arguing that expropriation should be a last resort to control the housing market. It is worth remembering that we are at a last resort today, in a highly stressed market. Recall the Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe overturned the “Mietendeckel” law of the previous left-wing coalition government where Die Linke housing senator Katrin Lompscher, had frozen price rises for five years and lowered rental contracts above €/m2 price limits. The housing situation in Berlin, a favourite city of finance and real estate capital for rapacity, is now at a point where only radical measures such as expropriation can be applied.

The SPD and the Greens are in a three-way negotiation, where the third partner is unclear. That could be Die Linke, the only party that has supported the referendum from the outset and without “buts”. But it could also be the liberals of the FDP, a party that strongly rejects the implementation of the referendum. In this context, in which the SPD sometimes seems more inclined to govern with the FDP, the pressure to re-establish a left-wing government is growing. The youth organisations of the parties, JUSOS (SPD), Grüne Jugend (Die Grüne) and Linksjugend (Die Linke), have issued a statement in favour of a left-wing coalition. This is the government formula that is considered to be the only one that can implement the referendum. Die Linke is considered to be the only guarantee of pressure to push through the law on the expropriation and socialisation of the large real estate companies.

That is why the DWE campaign is also increasing pressure on the SPD to ensure that, on the one hand, the will of the people as expressed at the referendum is fulfilled and, on the other hand, that the SPD does not throw itself into the arms of the FDP, because that would be a very bad message. However, even if a left-wing government is formed, expropriation and socialisation are not guaranteed. The SPD or even the Greens can empty a law of its content which then does not really express the will of the people and the DWE movement. At this point, the compensation that the real estate companies should receive for the expropriated houses comes into play, and here, Die Linke. is the only party that is prepared to support the sums proposed by DWE, i.e. those that guarantee that the expropriation will be below market price. DWE and Die Linke simply want Article 14.3 of the German Constitution to be complied with regarding compensation for expropriation, which has to be aimed at the common good and be a balancing of the interests of the parties involved. Any compensation based on market value would only and exclusively defend the interests of the real estate companies and their shareholders, not those of the tenants and public administrations.

In short, an uncertain scenario is now opening up. The referendum, even if it is technically non-binding, does bind with its result the entire policy that will be developed in Berlin in the coming years. It determines the political and social agenda of the city, forces the parties to take a stand and take off their disguises. This keeps the city in a state of tense calm. A city that will not accept that the referendum is not implemented or that it is emptied of its content. Failure to implement the referendum opens up an uncertain future with unimaginable consequences. The mobilisation and the strength that DWE has generated will not be lost overnight, and betraying the will of the people could have an effect that multiplies both the strength and the scale of the struggle for decent housing.

Photo Gallery: Demonstrating to Support Striking Health Workers, 9th October 2021

Zeit der Verleumder – review

A new film offers real insights on the discussion of Palestine in Germany


09/10/2021


“On 10 February 2018, German, Israeli, British and US-American researchers, journalists, artists and political activists met in Berlin. At a conference with the title “Zur Zeit der Verleumder” (“At a Time of Slanderers”), following a poem by Erich Fried, they, together with around 250 visitors, analysed the ideological instrumentalisation of Jews, Judaism and the Jewish catastrophe to legitimize right wing power politics, anti-Communism, historical revisionism and (anti-Muslim) racism in the Western world.”

So read the opening titles of Dror Dayan and Susann Witt-Stahl’s new film Zeit der Verleumder, subtitled “An ideological-critical intervention”. As one of the 250 visitors present, I have a particular interest in this documentary.

The line-up is impressive: actors Rolf Becker and Jürgen Jung, historian Moshe Zuckermann, British Jewish-Black activist Jackie Walker, theologian Hans Christoph Stoodt, Palestinian activists Fouad El Hay and Ali Abunimah, philosopher Moshé Machover, and many more spoke at the conference and are featured in the film.

Different speakers discuss the current debate on Israel/Palestine in the context of the international developments. In recent years we have experienced the rise of parties like the AfD, and of the Evangelical Right around politicians like Donald Trump. Both Zuckermann and Abinumah discuss how one sort of racism – antisemitism – has been reproduced by another – Islamophobia, allowing for prejudice to remain, just wielded against a different group.

The Accusations

For Walker the timing of the conference is important; it took place while Jeremy Corbyn was still leader of the British Labour Party, between the 2017 and 2019 elections. It was during this period that false accusations of antisemitism against Corbyn and his party reached their apex. Walker speaks eloquently about how such accusations were weaponized against the Left, both in Britain and internationally.

We are later reminded that the Simon Wiesenthal Centre called Corbyn “the biggest global threat to Jews.” In Britain, as in other countries at the time, accusations of antisemitism were used as a political weapon aimed at silencing both solidarity with Palestine and the growth of a new Left.

Becker argues that the instrumentalization of the Holocaust is not just about Palestine: Joschka Fischer of the Green Party used his stated fears of a second Auschwitz to justify the bombing of Yugoslavia – the first German post-war military intervention – which he ordered when he was foreign minister.

Zuckermann cites a “specifically German problem” which he calls the “extended arm of Hitler” and talks of an “almost hysterical solidarity with Israel”. He speaks of a German philosemitism which fetishizes Jews, removes their individuality, and has the same roots as antisemitism. This, he argues provocatively, is not so far from how the Nazis treated Jews.

The Wrong Sort of Jew

Geographer Christin Bernhold explains how accusations of antisemitism work in practise. One year before, the bank account of the German Jewish organisation Jüdische Stimme (JS) was closed by their bank. The reason given was that the JS supports the BDS campaign and opposes Israel. As JS board member Shir Hever remarked, this was the first time since the Nazi regime that a German bank had blocked the bank account of a Jewish organisation.

Many of the speakers – most of them Jewish – list personal attacks waged against them. Jewish journalist Judith Bernstein was accused of “not being a real Jew”, Walker of being a Holocaust denier, and Becker a “Jewish eyewitness who relieves antisemites from their guilt”. Of course, none of these allegations is true, but the hope was that, if enough mud is thrown, the sense that something is not quite right will stick. This was, in the end, exactly what happened to Corbyn.

A section of the film looks at the definition of antisemitism as put forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). These parameters were fully adopted, among others, by Corbyn’s Labour Party. David Feldman of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism finds that the IHRA definition was “imprecise and isolated antisemitism from other forms of bigotry”.

Yet the lack of response from the political Left continue to allow vague and ungrounded accusations of antisemitism to take hold because no one is opposing them.

Identifying the Problem

For me, the film dedicates too much time to discussing the so-called “Antideutsche” (anti-Germans), as was the case at the conference. The criticism of this strange pro-Israel group which considers itself to be part of the German Left is correct, but exaggerates their influence. Outside some universities and the ultra-Left scene, very few people know that they exist.

Similarly, there were many valid criticisms of both the German Left as whole and the party die LINKE in general. Becker remarks that the LINKE Berlin culture senator Klaus Lederer has claimed to stand “for a quite new Left which doesn’t see the central contradiction as being between Capital and Labour but the inner contradictions inside Capital relations”. This is, Becker argues, a clear attempt to justify joining capitalism and is linked to Lederer’s pro-Israel stance.

I don’t disagree with his analysis, but would argue the problem is less that the Antideutsche and Lederer are opposing Palestinian rights, but that – because of German history – the majority of German Leftists are reluctant to take a stand at all. This leads them to not acknowledge the crimes which are being carried out against Palestinians. I find that this lack of debate is a far greater obstacle to building solidarity with Palestinians. The question is, how can we open up this debate?

Without offering an alternative, criticisms like Becker’s have the danger of leading us into the cul-de-sac of apportioning blame without seeing a way out. Zeit der Verleumder offers plenty of ammunition to demonstrate why Palestinians don’t just deserve but require our support. Yet we must deliver this support in the form of concrete actions, aimed at involving more than a small minority of German society.

How can we respond?

Becker concludes by quoting Bertolt Brecht: “We must say that torture must happen, because the structures of ownership must remain. If we say this, we will lose many friends who are against torture because they believe that the structures of ownership can be maintained without torture. This is not true.”

Machover draws the following conclusions: “Ultimately, Zionism can be overthrown and will be overthrown by unity of the working class of the whole region, that is to say of the Arab East and Israel.” While I don’t share Machover’s illusion that the Israeli “working class” has something to gain here, it is refreshing to see a solution offered that does not depend on the actions of Western powers.

Zuckermann’s conclusion is that “everything which has happened historically can be overcome historically. There is nothing in human history that can’t develop in some way into a turning point.” Becker says, simply, “Show which side you are on”. Following this logic, Machovar calls on German activists to campaign against their government supplying Israel with nuclear submarines.

The film concludes with a statement by musician and Holocaust survivor Esther Bejarano, who unfortunately recently died. She says:

“Regarding the inhumane politics of the Netanyahu government in Israel, my companions Moshe Zuckermann and Rolf Becker have comprehensively explained our criticism. What Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists did to the Jewish people – the extermination of 6 million people, the Holocaust, must not be Israel’s justification for the discrimination against the Palestinian people. It is particularly important that everyone in Germany in whom a human heart beats finally recognise that criticism of the politics of Israel cannot be compared with antisemitism. I did not survive the Extermination Camps Auschwitz, the Concentration Camp Ravensbrück and the death march, to be insulted by so-called Antideutsche and consorts as an antisemite.”

Zeit der Verleumder – the film, and the conference, show why it is necessary for those of us who live in Germany to tirelessly raise the issue of Palestine in all progressive organisations and movements. It also provides us with arguments which we can use. The next step is with us.

The online premiere of Zeit der Verleumder will be on Sunday, 10th October at 6pm, Berlin time. To watch the film, follow this link.

News from Germany and Berlin, 8th October 2021

Weekly news roundup from Berlin and Germany


07/10/2021

compiled by Ana Ferreira

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Gorillas drivers: “Don’t look at us as numbers or machines”.

In Berlin, drivers of the popular delivery service Gorillas have once more gone on strike against poor working conditions. The company is one of the most thrilling and controversial start-ups in Germany – and the fact that it does not rest is nowhere more evident than in Berlin. Just on Monday morning, another one of the delivery service’s warehouses in Tempelhof was closed for two days. The demands of the riders are manifold: twelve euros per hour wage, quick maintenance of the bikes, better allocation of shift work, intermediate breaks and information about how heavy the bags filled with food actually are. Source: rbb

No room for queer treasures

Berlin receives a great gift: Prof. Dr Jan Philipp Reemtsma’s Hamburg Foundation for the Promotion of Science and Culture donated an extensive library on the history of sexual science to the Magnus Hirschfeld Society. With these, the city gets a replacement for the library of Dr Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science destroyed in 1933. The Magnus Hirschfeld Society would also like to make this treasure accessible to the public, but there are currently no rooms for an extension of the library. Worse still, the institution will have to leave its premises next year because the building is to be converted for a federal ministry. Source: queer.de

Another large police search of Rigaer 94

First a fire inspection with 1,000 officers, now an identity check with over 300 police officers, some of them wearing hoods: when it comes to the left-wing house project in Rigaer Straße 94 in Friedrichshain, the Berlin police spares no effort. And, yes, the police are “only” enforcing an order issued by the local court. The timing of the martially executed search of the house project as well as the announced eviction of the “Köpi” car park in Mitte is nevertheless remarkably convenient – at least for the opponents of a continuation of the previous centre-left alliance in the city. Source: nd

Strike could end at Charité but must continue at Vivantes

About the strike in Charité and Vivantes: of course, a collective bargaining dispute can only be fought “hard”. But in the end, all parties stand next to each other and say: “It’s a milestone”. It is easy to be understood: if the working conditions are not good, it will not be possible to increase the massive lack of staff, and it will not be possible to persuade the employees who are still there to stay. The Charité has realised this. For Vivantes, the latest developments show that their demands are not an illusion. Relief is possible. Source: nd

 

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Reservists of the Bundeswehr allegedly planned attacks on migrants

The public prosecutor’s office in Lüneburg is investigating nine accused on charges of joining or commanding an armed group. According to SPIEGEL reports, the group planned to kill migrants. In September, investigators searched eight properties in Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia and Berlin because of the suspicions. Weapons, ammunition and material were seized which suggested that the reservists were right-wing extremists. The investigators learned too that Jens G. was in close contact with an advisor in the Federal Ministry of Defence. A spokesperson for CDU Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer said the ministry was pursuing an unyielding line on the issue of right-wing extremism. Source: Spiegel

AfD successful in Saxony

In Dorfchemnitz, over 50 percent voted for the AfD. Why did the AfD gets its best results in Saxony? In Saxony as a whole, where the AfD achieved 24.6 per cent in the federal election. The party got its worst results in western Germany. In the constituencies of Cologne II and Münster, for instance, it achieved only 2.9 per cent. However, the voters in Saxony state they are not “brown.” Who can untie the knots and contradictions of such situation? The political scientist Hans Vorländer, from TU Dresden, argues that the AfD has replaced the Left and above all the CDU with the image of the caretaker party. Source: taz

Asklepios clinics threatened with indefinite strike

According to the trade union ver.di, 91 per cent of the employees questioned in a ballot were in favour of industrial action. Ver.di is criticising the fact that Brandenburg employees earn up to 10,000 euros less per year for the same work than colleagues at the group’s Hamburg sites. An Asklepios spokesperson claimed that the union would drive the clinics to ruin. Since the last round of negotiations in June, workers in Brandenburg have already been on strike for a total of ten days. It is not yet clear when the indefinite strike will begin. Source: deutschlandfunk