The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Oyoun on the Brink: Controversial Closure Raises Questions

Still no reaction from the Berlin Senate | Oyoun has filed a lawsuit | Invitation to the press conference and festival kick-off on December 14-16


13/12/2023

Current Situation: Communication Breakdown

The sudden termination of Oyoun’s assured four-year project funding until 2025 – effective from January 01, 2024 – was announced by Berlin’s Cultural Senator Joe Chialo (CDU) during a live stream of the Cultural Committee on November 20, 2023. The senate has yet to respond to demands for access to documents under the Berlin Freedom of Information Act (IFG) made by Oyoun on the same day. The same goes for all other requests made by Oyoun thereafter.

On November 21st, Oyoun received a message citing the Senate’s refusal to allocate funds for the payment of Oyoun’s staff wages, stating that, “the institution will be re-advertised via public tender.” Particularly sensitive is a further reduction of €35,000 in the ongoing funding rate for December 2023, which remains unpaid to this day.

Unfounded Accusation of Antisemitism

There is no legal basis known for an early revocation of the funding contract between the Senate and Oyoun, as well as the ongoing employment contracts between Oyoun and its employees. Oyoun has explicitly refuted the accusations made by the Senate regarding “hidden antisemitism.”

In its statutes, self-perception, Code of Conduct, a binding code of action, and a consensus of values, Oyoun explicitly opposes antisemitism and rejects any form of hostility towards people.

Unique Cultural Centre Files Lawsuit

Since its opening in March 2020, Oyoun has hosted over 2700 artistic and cultural events. The cultural centre has evolved into a unique hub for decolonial, queer*feminist, and diasporic perspectives for numerous communities. This is also reflected in the reactions to the impending closure: an open letter in solidarity with Oyoun was signed by over 13,000 people worldwide in a very short time.

A crowdfunding campaign to support the legal case against the funding cutoff reached its campaign goal of €72,000 within five days. As all previous mediation offers, requests for discussions, and even legal deadlines from the law firm Myrsini Laaser were ignored by the Senate and on December 7 an official lawsuit was filed.

Scandalous Lack of Transparency and its Effects

Within the scope of the ongoing lease agreement, regular appointments for January are currently being arranged between state-owned companies and Oyoun – a practice that suggests that even internal efforts by the Senate towards an efficient resolution are not currently taking place.

For the over 30 employees of Oyoun, the ongoing uncertainty means that, due to officially ongoing employment contracts, they cannot register as unemployed and fear the withdrawal of their livelihoods – for some, even their residency status is at stake.

Invitation to Press Conference + Festival

All signs indicate that Oyoun is to be made an example of. To draw attention to this intimidation, the associated grievances, the arbitrariness of the Berlin Senate, and the disastrous signal that the closure of Oyoun would have on artistic and freedom of expression in Germany.

Oyoun invites press and media representatives on December 14th at 10:30 a.m. to a press conference at Lucy-Lameck-Str. 32, 12049 Berlin. This event also marks the beginning of the three-day festival, Threads of Resilience.

For more information, contact Tariq Bajwa, Bettina Bender, or Wayra Schübel at Oyoun – kommunikation@oyoun.de

Palestine reading groups: more than just education

Mixing Theory with Practise can inspire people into action


12/12/2023

It all started with a social media post. It was 7th November, exactly one month after the Hamas attack in Southern Israel. Israel’s response had been murderous, with targeted bombings of hospitals, schools and residential areas. After an initial ban of all demonstrations against this terror, Berlin had started to see some sizeable ones – sizeable by German standards at least, but we’ll come to that.

This is the context in which Hanna, one of the speakers of the Berlin LINKE Internationals made the following post in theleftberlin internal Telegram channel:

Hi all, someone wrote me about whether there are any reading groups about Palestine, saying that a lot of people now going to the protests are not very well informed on the history and are learning things on the go and often from Instagram posts (which can be great but have their limits).

Does anyone know of something like this that already exists? Or does anyone have the energy to start a reading group through theleftberlin? I think we could be very well placed to lead something like this. I would be happy to be involved but wouldn’t have capacity to do it all by myself.

Hanna’s post reflected what a lot of us were already thinking. And if someone has a good idea, but no-one’s doing anything yet, why not do it ourselves? Someone agreed to assemble a set of texts to discuss. We contacted Café Karanfil, an anti-imperialist bar in Berlin-Neukölln and asked if we could use their cellar. There’s only room in the cellar for 10-15 people, but that didn’t seem to be a problem. We were organising everything quickly and at short notice.

Within 24 hours of us announcing the event, 40 people had registered. We immediately closed down registrations and booked a second meeting in Karanfil to discuss the same texts. To people who had not registered yet, we said that things had obviously taken on much bigger dimensions than we were expecting, and that we would organise a regular event in a bigger venue starting the following week.

Why were so many people interested?

At the beginning of each session, we ask everyone to introduce themselves and explain why they’re there. The original aim of the Reading Groups was to build up our knowledge, and to strengthen our ability to argue for Palestinian rights. This certainly has been one function of the groups, but it became quickly evident that many people were coming for a different reason.

During the introductions, person after person said: “I’m watching the devastation of Gaza, but when I raise this with my German friends they don’t want to talk about it, or – even worse – they try to justify it. I feel that I can’t talk about Gaza without jeopardising good friendships”. The Reading Group provided a safe space for a discussion that many people needed to have, but could not find anywhere else to have it.

Some people in the group – a minority – were Germans. They reported growing up in an educational system which worshipped at the altar of German Staatsräson (a phrase which has become more familiar to many people in the last few months). As survivors of this system, many of them still found it difficult to criticise Israel, even while they were witnessing the horrific bombing of civilians. But they too needed a space where they could talk.

All this meant that the level of debate was much higher than I was anticipating. Many of the people who were attending had clearly thought long and hard about the issue. The clarity and articulacy of their arguments helped raise all boats. Even people who had been affected by the lack of debate in Germany made engaged and informed contributions and questions from which we all profited.

Moving on up

After this initial dry run, the first official Reading Group was held on Friday, 21st November. Nearly 40 people discussed “What is Zionism?” The discussion mainly focussed on the foundation of the State of Israel and the Palestinian Nakba, although many people raised the question of how we could have similar discussions with a white German audience.

To ensure that everyone had a chance to speak, we broke up into small groups of 10-15 people, and then came back together to share what we’d learned. One mistake that we made was not to arrange anywhere to go after the meeting, as after the two hour Reading Group, people had the need to carry on talking.

The first couple of Reading Groups were held in the Projektraum auf H48, a collective housing project in Neukölln, to whom we are eternally grateful. The H48 collective represents the full range of opinions on the German Left, which means that not everyone was overjoyed about hosting a discussion on Palestine. Nonetheless, we never received anything less than support. H48 is currently making a legal challenge against gentrifiers who are trying to take over a necessary space in Berlin. We urge you to support their campaign.

The second reading group focussed on Palestinian Resistance, and in particular on Hamas. It was a discussion unlike any I’d ever had in Germany. Here, Hamas is the Todschlagargument (knockout argument). If ever you try to raise Palestinian rights, all someone who disagrees has to do is ask “but what about Hamas?”, usually resulting in any discussion being closed down.

In the reading group, however, no-one challenged the idea that Hamas’s violent reaction to decades of oppression and subjugation was legitimate. The discussion focussed more on two issues – is the Hamas strategy effective, and what mistakes did the Palestinian Left make, which led to Hamas being able to lead this resistance? As ever, we heard many different and nuanced points of view, and everyone was given a fair hearing.

By 8th December, we’d moved once more, to the AGIT offices in Nansenstraße 2. AGIT is a British left-wing organisation which made room booking less complicated. For the third week running, over 30 people turned up to discuss German Memory Culture and the specific problems encountered by Internationals who try to raise the issue of Palestine in Germany.

Onwards and upwards

The next Reading Group is planned for Friday, 15th December, when we will be discussing the One State and Two State Solutions, once more in Nansenstraße 2. You can register and see the recommended reading here. After that, we will be taking a break over the holiday period, then resume in January with a discussion about the role of the Arab States surrounding Palestine.

Over the break, we will take the opportunity of organising two surveys – one to find the day(s) which best suit everyone, and another to decide the topics for future Reading Groups. We are also looking for people who can collect suggested reading about a particular subject. One of the successes of the group is that we organise collectively, with everyone making the contributions that they can.

The Reading Group has also sparked off a number of other initiatives. We now run an occasional Palestine film evening, part of which includes food and a fundraiser for Palestinian causes. We have produced stickers, which anyone can pick up on Friday. In January, we’ll be organising a public meeting on Apartheid Israel with South African academic and anti-apartheid activist Patrick Bond and Palestinian lawyer Nadija Samour.

We have also set up a parallel group to increase public support for Palestine solidarity in Berlin. This group had its first meeting just before the last Reading Group and is planning a discussion of narratives, the development of our skills and confidence, and reaching out to possible allies. The aim is a staged intervention in German civil society aimed and shifting the balance of what we (are allowed to) discuss regarding Palestinian rights and to build support for Palestinian liberation.

If you are interested in any aspect of this, the first step is to come along on Friday. We also carry out a lot of preparatory work in the Reading Group section of theleftberlin Telegram channel. You can join the channel here. If this sounds like too much, but you want to be informed about coming events, everything will be announced in the weekly Newsletter of theleftberlin to which you can subscribe here.

What have we learned?

The Palestine Reading Groups were never intended to be an alternative to the demonstrations – more a supplement. Indeed, we try to link the two. At the end of each meeting, we tell people about the next demo, and try to set up a meeting place where we can meet up and march together. In this way, we try to bring together theory and practise at a time when both are sorely needed, particularly in Germany.

The most important function of the Groups has been to break the isolation of Palestine activism in Germany. Many people – both Germans and non-Germans – feel instinctive support for the Palestinians, but also that they are on their own, which makes it difficult to implement effective change. The Reading Groups are not just about education. They also help to bring us together and feel the strength of our collective solidarity.

We have committed ourselves to continue organising Reading Groups for as long as people want to attend. We rather expected that after the first 1 or 2 meetings, attendance would tail off. This has not happened so far. Instead, we seem to have chanced upon fulfilling a need deeply felt by people who are appalled by the devastating bombardment of Gaza. We will continue to do this, both in the articles we publish on theleftberlin and in the Events we offer.

We have also now adopted an informal policy of “bring a white German”. This is in part a joke, but also a statement of intent. We want to break out of our international bubble where opposing the State murder of thousands of children is not controversial. We want to see demonstrations in Germany which are as big as the ones we see in London and New York. And we can’t do that if only Internationals are demonstrating.

If you are interested in setting up your own reading group, or would just like to read more about different aspects of the israel/Palestine conflict, we have just set up a page of all the readings which we have suggested for Reading Groups so far. As more Events take place, we will continue to update this list. If you have any questions about what we are doing and what we have learned, feel free to contact us on team@theleftberlin.com.

If You Prick Us, Do We Not Bleed?

Arab men are racialised as terror adjacent in the West, an association that leads us to forget the innocence of Palestinian men.


10/12/2023

Labels are tricky. They can elide as much as they can reveal. They are stalked by their own inadequacies in being able to describe the objects they are attached to. But now is the moment when nothing but unflinching candour will suffice.

I do not like to centre my maleness in political discussions because I know it is an instrument of oppression. Too often, men clamour for attention towards their own problems whenever attention is focused on the oppression they themselves create and enable. Women and children are often the focus of concern because they fit the script of ideal victims. This is not one of those moments.

When I saw the images of dozens of Palestinian men, sitting on the ground, stripped half-naked, with their heads bowed down, armed men surrounding them, the destruction wrought upon Gaza as their backdrop, my soul let out a yell of fury. That characteristic fury perhaps only men know. A violent rage bellowed within me because I knew what that image really meant. It is this rage that forces me to write frantically and scream at whoever reads this: “if you prick us, do we not bleed?”

When people see stories emphasising the threat posed by “young men of military age” seeking refuge in the West, they are talking about these men. When German politicians talk about “young Pashas”, they are talking about these men. When they suddenly take an interest in the misogyny of Islamic societies, they are thinking of these men. When they print headlines about weaponizing rape as an instrument of war, they are thinking of these men. When they scream themselves hoarse about beheaded babies they are thinking of these men. These are the men that are brutes until proven human.

The men they do not think about, are the men with guns stripping them naked and murdering in cold blood those that refuse to be humiliated. They do not think about white men in robes that rape boys. About fascists and skinheads spraying Swastikas and committing arson against Jewish owned businesses. They do not think about the ages of boys who eagerly joined the Hitler Youth, an alumnus of whom became Pope. They do not think about men in suits immiserating millions with their choices. They do not think about the men that dropped nuclear bombs. They do not think about the men that led two world wars and murdered 6 million Jews. In essence, those are the very males who are human, who have the right to rape and murder and starve and steal, who bleed when you prick them. Those beings in that photo on the floor, they are not men. They are mere fleshy vessels to be used for target practice, for entertainment abroad, and for casting suspicions on at home.

If I asked you, how would you know by looking at me, that I am an Arab? If you were to look at the faces of the men with guns, would you be able to immediately differentiate between Arab and Jew? Plainly, you cannot. All you would do is reveal the implicit bigotries that haunt your conscience. One is not born, but rather made an Arab, just as much as one is made a Jew. The great tragedy of the present moment, is that one is made a Jew in direct proportion to one’s willingness to oppress an Arab. This is quite literally the case in some quarters where Jews who stand against the genocide are labelled as un-Jews.

We men, we have our faults, they will persist long after this conflict reaches its grisly conclusions. The tone of our skin doesn’t change the burden of our collective guilt as men, but neither does it diminish our essential humanity. Palestinian men deserve as much sympathy as that afforded to the women and children that are dying beside them. The women and children that we so deeply mourn, they weep for them too. They weep for their brothers, for their sons, their fathers, uncles, and grandfathers. They grieve for their mentors and teachers who took the place of the men that were murdered or imprisoned their entire lives. They wail for each and every man who suffered an intolerable fate, for the loss of comfort, humour, and laughter that these men filled their lives with. They possessed all these qualities alongside their innumerable faults; faults that in no way merit their torture, dispossession, or death.

I am not an Arab; I merely resemble one. I don’t speak a word of Arabic, and I would likely struggle to relate to an Arab man just now. Yet I weep with them and for them because I know that we share a common destiny. We will either become, in the eyes of the world, human together, or we will be relegated as brutes among the “Civilised.” We do not have the guns or the bombs, the planes or the tanks, the money and the credentials necessary to qualify as civilised people. If the opposite were the case, we savages of a brownish complexion may participate in the same brutality that the West and Israel is currently gratifying itself with. However, in the present moment the savages and the saints are abundantly differentiable.

Women and children can indeed be victims of the very men they weep for upon their deaths. It does not serve their interests to see them treated like thieves, rapists, or murderers. It benefits no woman or child to have the men in their lives discriminated against, to be underpaid and abused, or to be collectively punished for the crimes committed by people who resemble them. To have the torture, humiliation, and murder of their men broadcast incessantly for months on end alongside a systematic denial of their suffering, inflicts tremendous harm on the very women and children we are so eager to express compassion for. This is all self-evidently true but, given all that has happened without nearly enough moral indignation in response, it bears repeating.

Berlin teachers are fighting for all of us

Today and tomorrow, educators are on strike. Why have there been so many strikes recently? A guide to the alphabet soup of union struggles in Germany


06/12/2023

What’s been going on with Berlin’s teachers this year? Today and tomorrow, thousands of them are on strike. For my friend Bob, this means his kids stay home and stare at their screens while he tries to work. Not a good system, but he can’t afford a babysitter for 20 euros an hour. Other families have been commandeering grandparents, but that’s not an option for many immigrants.

In his gut, Bob knows that these strikes are for a good cause, but the teachers’ union has not done enough to explain what they want, much less for non-German speakers (they provided a short letter in different languages as a PDF). For all you lefty parents out there, here is a guide to the alphabet soup of union struggles in Germany.

Today, thousands of teachers were on the streets demanding a raise. They are part of a huge union contract called TV-L that covers 2.5 million employees of Germany’s federal states. Every two years, give or take, both sides negotiate a new TV-L, accompanied by huge one-day strikes. This is usually a boring ritual, but Germany has seen the highest inflation for 50 years, so this year has been unusually spicy.

The main unions behind TV-L – the GEW (education workers) and Verdi (service workers) – are demanding raises of 10.5 percent, with at least 500 euros more for everyone. The current strikes include not just teachers, but also workers at day care centers, universities, hospitals, government agencies and much more.

But Berlin teachers were striking before TV-L, too. They want a separate contract called TV-G to protect their occupational health. Teachers’ jobs are making them sick, so they are demanding smaller classes. The GEW wants a maximum of 19 students in primary schools and 24 students in high schools (they are proposing a complicated table). As »nd« reported, the GEW Berlin called their members out to 17 additional strike days in the last two years.

In contrast to the United States, teachers in Germany make more than starvation wages. But the workload is impossible. High-school teachers are expected to give 26 hours of classes per week. With grading, preparation, meetings and a million other responsibilities, that adds up to over 50 and sometimes over 60 hours. Thousands of teachers work »part-time« (still more than 40 hours). Thousands suffer from burnout or other chronic illnesses.

Due to the shortage of teachers (and even a shortage of university students training to become teachers), classes get overstuffed or canceled. This is part of a general crisis of German schools. As the international PISA study just showed, German students are doing worse than ever. Berlin’s school buildings are crumbling, and at least 200 of them are full of asbestos. Some students try to avoid the bathrooms all day, as they haven’t been renovated since the 1950s.

As Inés Haider, a social worker at a Neukölln school explained to me, this is not about »lazy teachers« looking to put their feet up. When there are 30 or more young people in a classroom, »the students who most need help simply can’t get it.« Teachers want to do their jobs, but they’re not being allowed to. The union knows that there is no magic wand that will create thousands of qualified educators – but the government could at least commit to a plan to address the crisis.

Berlin’s teachers are striking for their colleagues across the public sector, many of whom earn far less. As Ryan Plocher, an American teaching in Neukölln, explained it to me: »Education needs a lot more than teachers. We need staff in the offices, people cleaning the buildings, social workers in the local government – and they all need to be paid fairly!«

Above all, teachers are striking for better education for everyone. Bob points out: »If you added up all the missed work and all the pay to babysitters, then it would be cheaper to just pay teachers what they deserve.« Amen. That’s why it’s a shame that the GEW hasn’t been mobilizing parents and students to join the strikes. Bob and I and lots of other parents would like to show our solidarity!

This is a mirror of Nathaniel’s Red Flag column which appears in Neues Deutschland

Meat is Murder

Sushi, Such is Life, and Sunflower Seeds

Shoes on the Danube Bank is a sculpture of 60 shoes made of iron, glued to the bank of the Danube River to commemorate the Jews of Budapest who were murdered during World War II. Walking by this memorial in the Hungarian capital, the absent bodies haunt you. Standing on the river’s bank among shadows of death, you cannot but visualize and live this scene when Jewish people were asked to take off their shoes before they were shot dead and fell into the cold waters. Sandals, boots, all different styles of shoes and sizes are a reminder that nobody was spared the brutality of the government’s Arrow Cross militias. It is also a stirring reflection of barbarity, and how humanity can be so animalistic. In the evening, the shoes disappear, drowned out by the brighter lights from the national parliament building across the river. A few passers-by commemorate the dead. They deconstruct the significance of the shoes by filling them with roses, turning shoes into flower vases.

On October 8, 2023, I visited the largest Jewish museum in Europe, the Jewish Museum Berlin. Across the street, you can see the W. Michael Blumenthal Academy. The Jewish Museum Berlin exhibits Jewish history from the Middle Ages to the present day through library collections, archives and drawings, among other documentation. Plenty of pictures of the mighty founder of the Zionist movement, Theodor Herzl, punctuate the halls of the museum. He stares at me. I am irritated. I am pleased, however, that entry to the museum is free. It is highly priced and paid for by German responsibility. German-Jewish history takes up – quite rightly – large parts of the site, composed of three buildings, covering some 3,500 square meters not far from Checkpoint Charlie. Inside the museum, one particular installation stands out.

In the installation, 10,000 faces made of steel are piled in a broad corridor. All the faces show, right below the nose, a carved-out and circular, open mouth to signify the faces’ cries and discomfort. Israeli artist Menashe Kadishman called the installation Shalekhet, which means “fallen leaves.” The installation is the only “empty” space in this part of the museum where visitors can enter and walk through. It is an interactive space where you are allowed to tread on the faces of victims of war, listening to the metal pieces as they clink and rattle against one another. The resounding echoes within these lofty grey walls are terrifying. This scene as well, again, is haunting.

In 2010, I visited the Tate Modern art gallery in London, where I saw an art installation called Kui Hua Zi or Sunflower Seeds by contemporary artist and political activist Ai Weiwei. The work consisted of 100,000,000 individually hand-crafted porcelain sunflower seeds, which filled the gallery’s 1,000 square-meter hall. The art installation weighs 150 tons, was hand-painted and fired at 1,300 degrees Centigrade, and required more than 1,600 workers to complete it over the span of two and a half years in China before it was exhibited in London. Visitors were initially allowed to interact, walk across, lay down and play with the sunflower seeds before the museum feared that dust from the installation could be harmful; they decided to fence off the exhibit afterward. I was one of the lucky ones who visited early and thus I took part. I was tempted to sneak one seed into my pocket, but I felt guilty so I put it back. Sunflower Seeds represents and symbolizes the vastness of China. On the one hand, an individual seed is instantly lost among millions, symbolizing the conformity and censorship of the Chinese Communist Party. On the other hand, the combination of all the seeds represents the unity of the people to stand up and overthrow any political party.

In 2011, Ai Weiwei was sentenced to 13 years in prison for subversion of state power, but was released 81 days later and handed a $2.4 million fine for tax evasion. His passport was confiscated, and he was placed under house arrest for four years. When his passport was returned to him, he left for Germany where he was offered a professorship at Berlin University of the Arts. In an interview published in The Guardian in 2020, Ai Weiwei explains why he quit Germany for Britain, calling the country “intolerant,” as well as “bigoted and authoritarian.” Ai Weiwei in the interview compares Germany to Britain, another colonial power. “In Britain,” he says, “they are colonial. They are polite at least. But in Germany, they don’t have this politeness. They would say in Germany you have to speak German. They have been very rude in daily situations.” He mentions he was thrown out of taxis on three different occasions in Berlin. “They deeply don’t like foreigners,” he adds. Ai Weiwei here is like a Nazi German officer: he does not spare anyone any harsh criticism. He mentions demonstrations in 2018 in which thousands of right-wing extremists on the streets of Chemnitz, a town in eastern Germany, were shouting “Foreigners Out.” “Ai believes,” writes The Guardian, “the country [Germany] has become indifferent to the suffering of others, both within Germany and outside.”

Fast-forward: it is November 16, 2023, and Ai Weiwei’s new exhibition in London is cancelled based on allegedly “antisemitic tweets” in which he defended Palestinians and their right of self-determination. Other exhibitions in New York, Berlin and Paris have also been cancelled. Ai moves to Lisbon, where he has started building a copy of his demolished studio in China. “Planning permission wasn’t easy,” he tells his interviewer. With a conspiratorial smile, he explains: “When they asked me what I was going to put in it, I said sunflower seeds.” Ai Weiwei visited Gaza in 2016 where he filmed parts of Human Flow, a German documentary he directed and co-produced on the impact of human migration and internal displacement. Israeli authorities had initially refused to let him in, claiming that the Gaza visit could pose a threat to his life.

II

On October 7, 2023, I went to have dinner on Sonnenallee in Neukölln. On the street, German police were asking people for identification, clearing out crowds of Palestinians and making sure people were not handing out stickers of Palestinian flags or chanting the words, “Free Palestine.” This reminded me of a scene from the infamous German movie of 1999, Sonnenallee, where a border checkpoint was still in operation for a few months and at which East Berliners still had to show their identity documents, to be stamped by the German Democratic Republic border authorities. A few Palestinian youngsters were celebrating at Hermannplatz earlier in the day, handing out baklava and other sweets in the middle of Berlin. This was their way of celebrating the revival of Palestinian resistance which has been diminished for many years in Palestine, because of the complicity of the Palestinian Authority with Israel, as well as outside Palestine, due to the oblivious international community and its absent application of regulations, humanitarian laws and protocols as set by the Geneva Conventions.

Lest we forget, these youngsters are exiled children and grandchildren who are the direct descendants of the 1948 Palestinian Nakba/Catastrophe and the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. They will cheer for any reason that provides them with hope to return to their homeland and/or feel “at home.” “Home,” writes Nagib Mahfouz, an Egyptian writer and Nobel Prize winner, “is not the place where you are born. It is the place where all your attempts to escape cease.” Perhaps Germany will be such a place, one day. Today, however, this is not only hindered by German policies but also by fellow exiles in Berlin. In a Tagesspiegel article written by a Turk (whose name was anonymised by the editors), Arabs who live and work on Sonnenallee are seen as more “aggressive” and “less cultured than Turkish people.” This is why, claims the article, Arabs are not able to integrate into German society, are always in trouble and live constantly on the margins.

Once you arrive at what is known as the “Street of Arabs” in Berlin, Die Arabische Straße, you are greeted by a street sign hanging on an electric pole: Sonnenallee (Sun Avenue, or Sunny Road, or perhaps Sun Alley). The sign is underlined with a colorful sticker that reads: Free Palestine. You walk these lively streets while ghosts of Palestinian detainees, prisoners and martyrs haunt you, looking at you from every poster tacked up on neighborhood walls. The street is punctuated with sounds of Arabic dialects, the poetic lines of graffiti sprayed left and right and signs in Arabic, German and Turkish, the fragrance of frying oil and tobacco. Here you see and smell and hear Palestinian memorabilia, Syrian desserts and clothing stores, Turkish döner and baklava, Iraqi spices, Lebanese pastries, Kurdish and Egyptian music. It is loud and chaotic on Sonnenallee, compared to other parts of Berlin. Such is life.

Sonnenallee is a space that allows for cultural translation and healthy dialogue. I see German hipsters in this area with their Arab and Turkish friends. It is a refreshing sight. You could not tell that this was a street established in the nineteenth century, called in 1938 Braunauer Straße after the birthplace of Adolf Hitler, and once divided by the Berlin Wall. It was a border crossing between East and West Germany, before reunification and the fall of the Soviet Union. Today, Sonnenallee deconstructs and frees this street from its colonial context, expands its borders culturally, challenges the parameters of its society, and offers spaces for political revision. Integration with German culture and society, however, by Arabs generally and Palestinian youths particularly, will always be problematic. Integration will always be challenged and ultimately result in mere assimilation, if at all, because the 10 percent of inhabitants of Sonnenallee who have an Arab background have seen and witnessed how Germany keeps supporting the killings of their brothers and sisters and the ongoing Israeli settler-colonization in Palestine. On October 12, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said that two-armed Heron combat drones, leased by the German military, as well as shipments of German ammunition, have been deployed for use by Israeli forces. Millions of euros were given in November 2023 to further aid the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Over a billion and a half euros are paid in compensation for Holocaust survivors. “There is only one place for Germany,” said German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in a speech to lawmakers, “that place is Israel’s side.” A few days later, Scholz’s face outshined the otherwise dull red cover of German magazine Der Spiegel. The caption: Wir müssen endlich im großen Stil abschieben, “We finally have to deport people on a large scale” (October 20, 2023).

Before the start of Russia’s war with Ukraine in 2022, it had been Germany’s longstanding official policy not to supply arms to conflict zones. Despite Berlin’s commitment to rethinking its security and foreign policy, opposition to German military entanglement in overseas conflicts still runs deep in German society. Palestinian protestors on the streets today affirm their national identity as a defensive mechanism in the face of Western capitalism, colonialism and materialism overseas. They are seen bemoaning racism, dreaming of assimilation, haunted by nostalgic dreams, waiting for a physical return, idealizing a national image, instinctively identifying with and focusing on the natal and inherited as opposed to the forced and required. Despite speaking the German language and receiving generous state funding, Palestinians in Germany always feel pushed to the margins. This feeling varies, of course, from one generation to another. This is however the ambience under the sun of this “multicultural” avenue in Neukölln. It is intensely heated. Physical and financial accommodation will not necessarily house these refugees culturally or mentally, because Germany’s political stance will always jeopardize such dynamics.

Sonnenallee is as German as DHL, and DHL is not authentically German. It is originally an U.S. American company. The letter D in DHL does not stand for Deutschland, either. DHL was founded in 1969 in San Francisco by Adrian Dalsey, Larry Hillblom, and Robert Lynn, the DHL formed from the first letters of the founder’s family names. Most Germans will tell you otherwise, because they do not factually know. Germans say this, however, because they have been told the D stands for Deutschland, and this has been cemented as part of the country’s global reputation and cultural foundation since the German postal services, Deutsche Post AG, was privatized. Some Germans too will employ similar logic to rationalize the statement that Palestinians are terrorists, even though they do not factually know this. It is, however, a perceived fact sponsored by, and shared with, the United States and its complicit mass media.

According to the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, “German food culture is changing. The number of vegans is growing, and more than half of the population wants to reduce meat consumption, considering themselves flexitarian. This makes Germany one of the most important markets for plant-based food worldwide with good opportunities for U.S. exporters.”

Given this, I expect more sympathy and empathy from Germany towards “human animals” to be saved. It is meant to be ironic – given the ridiculous support Germany provides to Israel and the vegan selections and choice it makes available for its people.

Palestinians have been a main target of racial prejudice in Germany in recent days, burdened by unjust political decisions restricting their mobility and freedom of speech. They have also been subjected to heavy surveillance and police patrols. Sonnenallee was a border crossing for Berliners during the city’s years of division. A monument by artist Heike Ponwitz offers a reminder of state surveillance in the former border area. The piece is called “Crossing Over: Proximity and Distance,” and includes two pairs of telescopes. Looking through them, the word Übergang (Crossing Over) disrupts the view, as it is overlaid across the landscape beyond the lens. Today we are witnessing similar disruptions which silence only Palestinians, and distort the German sociopolitical space.

On October 11, 2023, a protest in support of Palestinian liberation was banned in Berlin. This was followed by a ban on displaying the Palestinian flag and the verbalization of the words “Free Palestine” in public spaces. Dozens of peaceful protestors who arrived despite the ban were kettled by police and lined up for criminal processing, with mugshots taken in public on Hermannplatz, in the neighborhood of Neukölln. The following day, an anti-colonial protest to mark Indigenous Peoples’ Day that took place outside the German Foreign Office in Berlin welcomed the presence of Palestinian voices, alongside those from Guatemala and Aotearoa. The rally was interrupted with violence multiple times by the Berlin police. Police intimidated and arrested anyone who said out loud, “Free Palestine,” during the peaceful gathering. On October 15, a pro-Palestinian rally was authorized at Potsdamer Platz, only to be subsequently banned minutes before it began, with police intimidating and aggressively handling participants before arrests. On October 16, Berlin’s department of education granted school administrations the authority to police students and ban Palestinian symbols such as Palestinian flags and Palestinian scarves, called kuffiyeh. Throughout this period, police in Berlin have been actively patrolling, intimidating and arresting Arabic speakers in Neukölln around Sonnenallee, a predominantly migrant neighborhood in a city that is home to one of the biggest Palestinian communities in Europe.

I have read testimonies and have watched videos that have documented multiple instances of intimidation, targeted insults and threats of dismissal for anyone who expresses their support for the Palestinian people. The Mainz German Football Club, for example, has dismissed and terminated the contract of a Arab Moroccan player, Anwar El Ghazi, for posting on Instagram calling for an end to the genocide in Gaza.

The selective criminalization of Palestinians, Palestinian voices and Palestinian national symbols is not humane. This selective proscription of people who support the Palestinian cause and who practice their right to peacefully exercise anti-colonial resistance is not fair. The internationally complicit silence over Palestinian suppression is unacceptable. The Palestinian flag, the Palestinian kuffiyeh and the words, “Free Palestine,” are all constituent elements of a cultural identity and a nonviolent means of resistance, to colonialism and ethnic cleansing.

III

I have written essays about literary holocausts and about the dangers of censorship. I also have written about the failure of multiculturalism in Europe, the politics of identity, the myth of the “clash of civilizations,” the dangers of nationalism, xenophobia and racism, and the poetics and problematics of immigration and displacement. I have discussed Berlin’s troublesome locus in challenging the arts-funding status quo, to maintain its status as Europe’s self-proclaimed “art capital.” All these issues came together when The Arab Publishers’ Association in Egypt and The Sharjah Book Affair in the United Arab Emirates decided to withdraw their participation from the Frankfurt Book Fair in Germany – a fair which aims to highlight the role of culture and books in encouraging dialogue and understanding between peoples. This was in in response to a statement by the director of the Frankfurt Book Fair in October in support of Israel, and the decision by the fair’s management to withdraw an award for Palestinian author Adania Shibli for her novel, Minor Detail, which was longlisted for the International Booker Prize in 2021. The novel depicts the life of a Palestinian woman who was raped by Israeli soldiers in 1949, and addresses the violence, memory and suffering of Palestinians. German broadcaster Deutsche Welle reported that the award organizers cancelled the event at the last minute.

Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek raised pivotal questions and points during a speech at the book fair, as well as in interviews afterward. He highlights an idea I have always shared: that the Jewish diaspora has significantly contributed to the establishment of our civilization and of cultural modernity. This diaspora has also contributed to many intellectual and spiritual achievements which simply could not have happened in a narrow, tribal society like that of ancient Judaea. Examples of individuals from this fruitful Jewish diaspora can be found in Sigmund Freud, Franz Kafka, Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso, among many other names. You can also find caricatures and gigantic stickers of these figures and more all over the walls of the Jewish Museum in Berlin. Zizek in his comments stresses that Zionist Israelis are using the Holocaust to justify their actions today. He makes sure to clarify, however, that the criticism of Israeli politics is not antisemitic. I wonder: how can quoting Israeli and Jewish writers and artists who are against Zionist ideals, such as political scientist Ilan Pappé and physician and author Gabor Maté, for example, be antisemitic?

Antisemitism is becoming the new Nazism. Antisemitism is a European problem, generated over thousands of years of White Christians marginalizing and murdering Jewish people until these communities were pushed toward the Middle East. Explanations of the sociopolitical and historical conditions which led to the horrors of October 7, 2023, as well as in November 1947 are not antisemitic, because the contextualizing of an event does not mean the justification of an event. Such problems did not start on October 7. They started in 1896, with the establishment of the Zionist movement and the subsequent Palestinian Nakba/Catastrophe in May 1948.

This is not a war or conflict between Hamas and Israel, it is between Israel and Palestine. This conflict is not between Jews and Arabs, but between the United States and its interests in the Middle East. Hamas is not a terrorist group. It is a resisting group. I condemn Hamas but I also understand why it has become the world’s enemy; simply because people have been blocked from hearing their story. I am not a big fan of Hamas, nor of religion for that matter. Hamas, however, is only 36 years old and did recognize Israel as a state. Israel did not reciprocate. Instead, it has kept 2.3 million people locked up in a 360 kilometers strip of land for 15 years. Imagine being locked up in your house for 15 years. Society could not handle quarantine during Covid for two weeks. In fact, Israel admitted funding Hamas in the past to widen the gap between Hamas in Gaza and Fatah in the West Bank, so that Israel maintains control over both.

Zizek invokes an important saying: “An enemy,” he says, “is someone whose story you have not heard.” He stresses in his speech at the Frankfurt Book Fair that society must provide a narrative with equal representation for both sides. He invites the audience to mention the word “Palestine” in their description of the war between “Israel and Hamas,” because there are always two sides to any story. He highlights the importance of recognizing the massive despair that could give birth to such evil acts. Zizek was mostly booed off the stage in Frankfurt, while a few hands were clapping. In an interview on November 2 after the fair, Zizek said he sees in Germany a state that tries to compensate and pay for what it did to the Jewish people during World War II by supporting the state of Israel’s murderous deeds at the expense of Palestinian lives. He offered a hypothetical suggestion: If Germany has a historic responsibility to protect the Jewish homeland in atonement for its Nazism, and if Germany feels so guilty about killing six million Jewish people, why didn’t Germany grant the Jewish people a state in Hamburg, for example?

“Why was a Jewish state established in Palestine?”I have heard an answer to this question before. It would be: because it has been written in the Torah. Whether a book written thousands of years ago can be considered a legitimate justification for war and displacement, I will not address here. However, and by the same token, does not the Torah also say: “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man”? Israel’s Channel 14 keeps an updated count on its official website (accessed at 21:07 on November 16, 2023) of the number of “eliminated terrorists,” attacks in Gaza, wounded Palestinians and buildings bombed. Here are the numbers: 12,320 eliminated terrorists, 16,188 attacks in Gaza, 29,200 wounded Palestinians, and 32,376 buildings bombed. This is not godly, nor is it humane.

Germany should allow peaceful protests in support of Palestinian freedom as well as legalize expressions of solidarity in the use of Palestinian symbols and slogans. The government should end the policing of students and hold police authorities accountable for violence and the application of discriminatory policies. Germany has both a moral and political obligation to call for a ceasefire in Gaza, and to stop arming and supporting the state of Israel in its war against the Palestinians, inside as well as outside of Germany. It should abide by its democratic laws and ensure that history indeed does not repeat itself, because no one wants another Auschwitz in Gaza – or elsewhere.