The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Demo for Choice: 18th September 2021, Berlin

On 18th September, we demonstrated against the fundamentalist “Marsch des Lebens”. Here are some photos.


18/09/2021

Photos: Phil Butland, Rosemarie Nünning, Dervla O’Malley and others

Review of Summer Camp 2021

The Berlin LINKE Internationals had their Summer Camp in the Naturfreundehaus Hermsdorf on 4th – 5th September 2021. Here are some photos, videos and workshop minutes from the Event.

Photo Gallery

  • Click here for a gallery of photos from the Event

 

Video Gallery

The following videos are already online:

  • Short video about Summer Camp
  • Saturday evening meeting – Adelaide Ivánova on How can non-Germans get involved in Berlin politics: The experiments of Right2TheCity
  • Sunday meeting – Ferat Kocak and Franziska Brychcy on Non-Germans and the Coming Elections

 

Workshop presentations

 

Workshop minutes

Minutes of the discussions at some of the workshops

 

Programme

To remind you what we discussed, here is the full programme

 

Summer Camp 2022

Summer Camp 2022 will probably take place in late June next year. Subscribe to our Newsletter for the latest information.

To subscribe to our weekly Newsletter, either enter your mail address at the bottom left of this page, or contact us at teamleftberlin@gmail.com.

Left Breakthrough in Norwegian Election is a Model for Europe

The governing right-wing coalition has collapsed, while the openly communist Red party has gained seven seats


16/09/2021

Reading The Guardian write up on the Norwegian General Election last night compelled me to quickly compile this summary because, well, clearly they don’t follow Norwegian politics with the same zeal as myself. It helps to be able to read Norwegian, be obsessed with Norway, and have a man crush on their great shining star of socialism: Bjørnar Moxnes.

Vote share in Norwegian general election 2021 (source: https://www.nrk.no/valg/2021/resultat/)

Norway uses a proportional representation system whose name I won’t bother you with. Norway’s 19 regions are allocated a share of 169 seats in Stortinget (literally the big thing) based on both population and area. Parties are allocated seats based on performance within regions (direct mandates) and then allocated extra seats to bring their numbers up to their national vote share IF and only IF they reach 4% of national vote share (called Sperregrensa). You can still win seats if you perform exceedingly well within a region. That is how Moxnes won his lone seat in 2017 by winning enough votes in Oslo to be allocated one regional seat. That is how the Greens (MDG — Miljøpartiet De Grønne) won three mandates this cycle by performing well in three major cities (Oslo, Trondheim and Bergen).

Right wing parties have suffered a collapse after an unprecedented eight years in power in various coalitions. Collectively the bloc has lost 8.4% of its support, with the Christian People’s Party (KrF — Kristelig Folkeparti) falling below the 4% threshold, the Progress Party (FrP — Fremskrittspartiet) losing 23% and conservative Right (Høyre) losing 18.3% of their respective 2017 shares.

However, Moxnes’ Red Party smashed through the 4% threshold this cycle and they are going from 1 seat to 8. It is a truly remarkable and understated achievement (Norwegian news as well can’t help but red bait and downplay this success). They gained 2.3% in national vote share (a relative increase of 95% from their last election), the second largest absolute increase in share behind the rural issues focused Center Party (Senterpartiet), which gained 3.3% (relative increase of 32% from 2017).

The Greens are the best comparison to Red. Both parties had one seat coming in, both parties represent the progressive edge of the political spectrum. Both parties made gains too. The contrasts in results speaks for itself. When asked what mattered more in a debate, ending poverty or saving the environment, Moxnes said poverty while the Green leader (Une Aina Bastholm) said the environment. This is a ridiculous question to ask and should be thrown into the trashcan of ideology where it belongs. But Norwegians have spoken through both Red and the Center Party: foreground your politics in immediate, local concerns.

The centre-right liberal Venstre (literally and confusingly meaning Left) party also pivoted heavily towards the environment and I suspect that between the Socialist Left (SV — Sosialistisk Venstreparti), Venstre, Red, and to a degree the Labour Party all making some environmentally focused pitch, the greens have been completely crowded out and missed the 4% threshold by about 5000 votes. This isn’t exactly devastating. Political power does not lie exclusively in elected chambers. But for the next four years, MDG will lack leverage within parliament. Furthermore, them narrowly missing the threshold strengthens the hand of the upwardly failing leader of the Labour Party: Jonas Gahr Støre.

Despite snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in 2017 in a way that would make Neil Kinnock proud, despite losing vote share in 2021, despite backing noted Labour heavyweight and sex pest Trond Giske, Størewill become PM. Handpicked successor of former Iraq war protestor turned Sec-Gen of NATO Jens Stoltenberg, mini property tycoon, and dull as dishwater; he got his dream majority of Ap-Sp-SV (Labour, Socialist Left, Center Party). This is a repeat of Jens Stoltenberg’s second term coalition in 2005–2013. But the dynamics are very different.

Trygve Slagsvold Vedum of the Center Party campaigned on a platform of rural regeneration, repealing consolidation of small local authorities into larger more centralised ones, stubborn resistance to ending oil extraction and exploration, and removing the much disliked conservative Right. He has firmly promoted a minority Ap-Sp coalition. The classic centrist dad pitch in the Norwegian context. This is an international pattern: the political centre beginning to regain some support on the back of political legwork done by left and green parties, and the centre immediately demanding that these groups be cordoned off from political office.

Will this succeed? Parliamentary arithmetic and political trends make it clear to me that this is unlikely. The only credible threat Vedum can make is an Sp-H-V minority coalition which would give 72 seats. This is equal to the Ap-SV-R-MDG bloc. Such a coalition would be (1) electoral suicide, (2) politically weak, and (3) socioeconomically and environmentally disastrous.

Støre wanted a three-way coalition of Ap-Sp-SV and this coalition has a comfortable majority of 89 mandates. It would not be beholden in parliament to MDG nor Red. It will have a clear four year run to make much needed economic and environmental reforms. Only an idiot would choose to make common cause with parties you campaigned explicitly to remove. It is possible Støre’s neoliberalism might actually favour the minority coalition with Sp. This comes with a cost for Støre who campaigned explicitly on the three-way coalition, calling it his dream majority. It is especially difficult to backtrack given the wind is clearly in the sails of the left and the greens.

This is the central lesson of this election. The Norwegian left is threatening the centre. An openly communist party has doubled its vote share without eating into the share of the socialists. The greens have made appreciable strides in spite of all this and their political agenda is front and centre of the national debate. This is excellent for the left. SV cannot make too many concessions in coalition since it is facing pressure from both communists and environmentalists. Støre cannot fall asleep at the wheel either lest his four years in power disappoint and he bleeds more support to the minor left parties. All the while, the Centre Party is behaving triumphantly, in complete denial that its true political position is very weak.

Norway has voted for real change and insurgent left movements in Western Europe should learn to talk sharply and aggressively against the right. Moxnes quoted Leonard Cohen in his election night speech: “There’s a crack in everything, thats how the light gets in”. In the media, he routinely riles up Sylvi Listhaug (head of the right wing populist Progress Party) and whenever he’s redbaited he retorts with calling it what it is: Fox News nonsense. He spoke belligerently against neoliberalism, he was uncompromising and confident much like the Progress Party’s Siv Jensen was when she led her party to historic successes. The left can punch back and last night it did.

This article originally appeared on Ali Khan’s Medium page. Reproduced with permission

No to War!

Activities and actions marking the 20th anniversary of the beginning of the war in Afghanistan


15/09/2021

Resolution of the LINKE Party Executive Committee from 12th September 2021

The Party Executive Committee of Die LINKE calls on all party structures and organizations to join with allies in organizing vigils and activities on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the beginning of the war in Afghanistan.

On the 20th anniversary of the Afghan war, we remember the many victims who have died. The Costs of War project estimates at least 238,000 people have died in Afghanistan und Pakistan as a direct result of the war; in its Body Count study, the IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) calculates the number killed is likely five to eight times that amount. In addition, 3,600 soldiers of the Western alliance lost their lives, including 59 Bundeswehr soldiers.

We remember in particular the victims of the devastating airstrike in Kunduz, in which 141 civilians were killed. The attack was ordered by a German Army commander.

The acts of terror of 9/11 should never have been countered with war, because war engenders fresh terror. DIE LINKE has been pointing this out for years. We caution against provoking a new war. We oppose the airstrikes and targeted killings currently being carried out by armed US drones.

The assumption that development requires a military presence has proved to be unfounded. From the start, we have criticized the civilian-military cooperation as a fig leaf for military intervention.

We reject a foreign policy geared to geopolitical interests. We demand of the German government, the EU, and NATO member states an immediate and non-bureaucratic intake of all Afghans who have been under threat for years and who are now acutely threatened. UNHCR funding must be increased. Deportations must be permanently stopped.

We will highlight DIE LINKE’s positions from our party platform on the day of action:

  • No Bundeswehr deployments abroad
  • Disarm the Bundeswehr, don’t rearm it – No to the Bundeswehr as a global deployment force
  • Stop arms exports: No profit from war!
  • A world with no nuclear weapons
  • Cooperation not confrontation: for an inclusive security system
  • Civil conflict management and crisis prevention

The national headquarters is creating a campaign package featuring:

  • “No to war” posters
  • Printable downloadable design templates for flyers
  • Social media graphics templates
  • Speaker pool

 

The original version of this resolution appears on the LINKE website. Translation: Julie Niederhauser

Solidarity Action for Ehsan!

Help a cook escape Afghanistan


09/09/2021

Ehsanullah, born in Kundus, Afghanistan, came to Berlin in 2015 as a 14-year-old.

Since 2019 he’s been living with a Berlin family and working as a voluntary chef in the FSX (Freie Schule Kreuzberg – Free School Kreuzberg). At the beginning of July this year he had booked flights to Kabul and back to visit his family for the first time in 7 years. He did not know that the Taliban would take Kundus on 8 August.

His family in Kundus, as well as the family in Berlin, have done everything to organise a way out for him – an exit from Afghanistan. Until now, they have not been successful.

Ehsan already has substantial costs for the telephone, food supplies and changing flights.

At the moment, there are two realistic possibilities of helping Ehsan now (and to help his family longer term).

1. We collect enough money for Ehsanullah´s return flight. A flight has been booked for 6th September. This flight will not happen, but it can be rescheduled to a later date – as soon as commercial flights can leave Kabul again. KAM Air and Turkish Airlines are airlines which have been offering flights from Kabul for days, but are still negotiating with the Taliban for permission.

As prices for this are currently rising quickly, we need a pot of money. We can pay for the flight from here through direct transfer. We are in contact with a travel agent, who is supporting us very well. The means that if we can collect the money it will go to a specific account from them and not to someone we don’t know.

2. We can raise money for a visa to Tajikistan or Uzbekistan (Pakistan and Iran are less possible for Ehsanullah). This requires a visa, which will also cost a lot of money. A return flight can also be booked from these countries.

The solidarity account for Ehsanullah and his family is as follows:

Nina Meems
IBAN: DE57 1001 0010 0580 8901 37
BIC: PBNKDEFF
Betreff: Spende für Patenfamilie Ehsan

This appeal was sent to theleftberlin by Bilgisaray, a reliable partner and host of our monthly Küfas. Translation: Phil Butland. Please donate generously.