The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

2025 in Film

The best (and some of the less good) films of last year


03/01/2026

Leonardo DiCaprio in one of his scenes in One Battle After Another.

I’ve been writing reviews of the films of the year for several years now (you can read my reviews for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 on my film blog). Here are my 20 favourite films of the past year (normal rules apply—all were released recently and I first saw them in the year 2025).

Good

  1. Favourite film of the year: Soundtrack to a Coup d’État

Remarkable documentary about the decolonisation of Africa, militant music, and the Black Power movement in the USA. Soundtrack to a Coup d’Ètat tells us what happened when, and why the half-hearted departure of Western powers led to their ongoing dominance of the Global South. It manages all this in a mood which is neither sombre nor hectoring. The film takes on the syncopated rhythms of the jazz music which features prominently. A revolutionary film in both form and content.

  1. Sinners

The year’s best ghost-music-romance-history-gangster-race-vampire film. Sinners tells many stories simultaneously, but it’s at its strongest when telling the Black experience in early Twentieth Century US America. One of those rare films in which the soundtrack is not just a set of cool songs which the director got the rights for, but an intrinsic part of the plot. I didn’t get on with director Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther, which makes it all the more reassuring that Sinners is both artistically and politically sensational.

  1. One Battle After Another

Many of his best fans will acknowledge, firstly, that Paul Thomas Anderson’s films are of differing quality, and secondly, that he has tended to stay away from politics. So the idea of him as director of a counter-cultural, anti-capitalist fable did not inspire. But what can I say? Anderson is sensational, Leonardo di Caprio is sensational (but not as sensational as any number of the superlative supporting actors). Funny, politically astute, with a highly memorable car chase towards the end. And it all ends on a note of optimism.

  1. The Ugly Stepsister

There have been a heap of female-directed, socially conscious horror films lately, of which this is one of the best. Ostensibly a retelling of the Cinderella story from the point of view of her stepsisters, this takes on beauty myths and the extent to which women, and their mothers, will go in order to remain within accepted norms. And just in case that sounds too worthy, it is also hilarious. By the end, the film has also subverted the myth that any normal young woman’s ambition would seriously be to marry a prince, charming or otherwise.

  1. Danke für Nichts

My favourite German film of the year, is a low-budget film about troubled young women in care. Which (we’re seeing a trend here for the films I really liked this year) is also very funny. There are more laughs than in any other film you’ve seen which contains suicide attempts, trauma, and existential angst. This is a female-led film about the joy and pain of being young and irresponsible. Look out for first-time director Stella Marie Markert, and all the actors, but especially Zoe Stein, who plays the largely mute Malou.

  1. Heldin

A simple enough concept—a day in the life of an overworked nurse, where missing staff members is part of the usual routine. Leonie Benesch, who’s in everything nowadays, is typically efficient, but here she’s even better than usual in a film which shows the struggles of an individual nurse at the same time as making it clear that the problem is systemic. Relatives are (justifiably) frustrated and the private patient is typically entitled, but Heldin never descends into cliché. Instead, it’s an effective intervention in an ongoing debate. 

  1. Sentimental Value

There is one look from Stellan Skarsgård in the trailer which assures you that this is going to be good. Skarsgård plays an arrogant film maker who is aware of his greatness even though no-one goes to see his films any more. But one word from his daughter Nora criticising his parenting provokes a look of absolute disdain. Skarsgård is only the second best actor in this film about absent fathers and broken families. Renate Reinsve who plays Nora is even better. This is a grown-up film which is never too pompous.

  1. Im Schatten des Orangenbaums

Epic film which is officially from 9 different countries, but that’s only because of the ongoing occupation of Palestine. Cherien Dabis, who also plays the mother, tells the story of one Palestinian family from the Nakba till the present day. Several good documentaries about Palestine have been released in recent years, but few dramas, particularly one as comprehensive as this one (and for once, comprehensive here is not a synonym for “too long”). Tragic and highly informative about why Palestinians resist.

  1. Hundreds of Beavers

From the sublime to the supremely silly. Hundreds of Beavers is basically a cartoon starring real life actors, some of whom are in animal costumes. Trapper John Kayak is trapped in a cycle of killing beavers to trade for produce, in particular a gun with which he can kill beavers. The scale of the story gets larger and increasingly ridiculous. Anyone who goes to see Hundreds of Beavers and hates it has my full understanding, but if you’re prepared to go with it and accept the silliness, it can be uproarious fun. 

  1. Kneecap

Who’d have predicted that 2025 would be Kneecap’s year? (before they got slightly overtaken by Bob Vylan). This film, released at the beginning of the year, helped to bring many of us on-message. Ostensibly an “origins” film, whose biggest draw was a cameo by Michael Fassbender, this turned out to be a heap of fun with a decent soundtrack. The politics are a bit splattergun, if generally on the right side. It’s everything you’d expect from a band, two-thirds of whom were in their twenties (and looked even younger).

  1. Universal Language

What is it about Winnipeg which produces such weird films? (I give you everything which Guy Maddin produced, especially My Winnipeg). This film is very much in Maddin’s tradition. Some reviewers tried to read too much into Universal Language, and in doing so removed most of its fun. This is a simple story about a search for some glasses, the retrieval of a 500 Rial note, and the tourist guide who has the least to show, all told in English, French, and Farsi. Don’t try and understand it, just sit back and enjoy the fun.

  1. The Girl with the Needle

Post-First World War Poland was grim, if this story of evictions, disfigurement, and attempted abortion is anything to go by. There are few jokes and the film is shot in a menacing monochrome but it is a captivating story about the desperate lives of working class women. Seen in the wrong mood, this could be seen as arduous misery porn, but we do feel for the main characters and share their pain. Behind all the degradation, it’s a compelling story of surviving the worst misfortunes. May not be a great date movie.

  1. Sorry, Baby

A quirky story about a young woman who has not quite got the hang of adulting, especially after her best friend leaves for New York. All while she is struggling to cope with a Bad Thing. Extremely well-orchestrated mixture of youthful silliness and Serious Issues, this film could have quite easily been too exploitative, the camera could have lingered too long, or the tone could have just been too trivial to match the serious content. Instead it manages to be both fun and make very important points about women’s oppression.

  1. The Teacher Who Promised the Sea

50 years after Franco’s death, thousands of the people whose deaths he ordered still lie in unmarked graves. This film shows the opportunities opened up by Spain’s 1936 Popular Front government, but also the repression which followed. The history lesson is mixed with a contemporary story of one of the many families trying to locate its forebears. This is a film which could have very easily been worthy but dull, but the fighting spirit and thirst for more engages the audience. It’s a story which is still very relevant.

  1. 28 Years Later

After Trainspotting became a phenomenon, and Danny Boyle was given increasingly large budgets, he didn’t always use them well. 28 Years Later combines Boyle’s Indie sensibility with some astounding set pieces. Throughout the film, we are unsettled by a sense of eerie unease, built on the wreckage of post-Brexit England. This is all leading up to a final 5 minutes in a quite different tone which ruined everything for some viewers. Then there are others, like me, who just can’t wait for the coming sequel. 

  1. Frankenstein

Guillermo del Toro was never going to make an understated Ken Loach-like Frankenstein. This film stays largely to the book, much to the disappointment of fans of neck bolts. We are shown a tale of hubris, told from the perspective of both an enlightenment scientist and his creation. There are plenty of metaphors hanging down for anyone who chooses to make something of them—about loneliness, the dangers of unfettered science, and of men being men. But the film also works as a spectacular action-packed yarn.

  1. A Real Pain

What initially looks like a superficial comedy about a neurotic Jew from New York, actually contains more depth than you’d first think. The withdrawn David and his brash cousin Benji are on a heritage tour of Poland, trying to find out what happened to their dead relatives who died in the Holocaust. The film manages to address the immensity of what happened without falling into trite sentimentality. And, however superficial Benji first appears to be, it is he who possesses the film’s heart and soul.

  1. Companion

If you read a description of Companion, it feels like it’s going to be one of those single-concept Science Fiction Issue Movies, which is worth a single viewing but has little new to tell us. And yes, it is about consumerism, gender role expectations, and the commodification of love. But then it gets batshit crazy and a load more fun. Come for the comfortable feeling that the film is on the right side politically. Stay for some astute political analysis, over-the-top mayhem, and jokes which are way too funny for this sort of film.

  1. Bird

A new Andrea Arnold film is always to be welcomed, even the ones which are not an easy watch. You can be sure from the start that this is not going to be set in some Gosford Park / Friends, alternative yuppie universe. Bird is a story with parallel plots, some of which are more effective than others. It stars Franz Rogowski and Barry Keoghan, neither of  whom is ever uninteresting. They are more than matched by  Nykiya Adams as the mixed-race hero Bailey, trying to negotiate a difficult world despite her irresponsible father.

  1. Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere

Bruce Springsteen’s mental breakdown: the movie. A film about the making of Nebraska—one of Springsteen’s least successful (and best) albums, was always going to be polarising, but I never expected it to be so introspective. This is the anti-Bohemian Rhapsody / Rocket Man (which is meant in a good way). None of the bombast of most recent biopics, and an honest account of the artistic process when things are not going well. Not at all what I was expecting—a very nuanced film which has something to say.

Less Good

And here are my 5 least favourite films of the year:

5. The End

The End found its way onto some critics’ Best-Of lists, and to be fair, it is not an offensive film, just very, very boring. It’s a post-apocalyptic world, and a couple is living with their servants and son in a bunker full of paintings which were once extremely expensive (some Important Points are obviously being made). And then, for no obvious reason, everyone starts singing. This is an overlong musical whose characters show no emotion, and even the songs are uninspiring. Tilda Swinton, you are so much better than this.

4. Parthenope

Parthenope is beautiful and intelligent. Of course she is. This is not the sort of film which is interested in the ugly, little people. She spends most of her time hanging around the beach in a bikini and doing her best to hide the intelligence which other characters assure us that she has. Everybody but a hammy Gary Oldman is in awe of Parthenope’s captivating beauty. The film, made in collaboration with Yves Saint Laurent, is little more than an extended advert. Like Parthenope, it is very pretty but has nothing to say.

3. The Helsinki Effect

The Helsinki Effect is not a bad film as such. It presents a case, which it backs up with documentary footage. But its main argument is based on such flimsy logic that it just does not work. Apparently, a 1975 meeting in FInland between Western and Soviet Bloc countries indirectly led to the downfall of the USSR. Except that there is no convincing argument that this is what happened. The real time coverage of boring meetings, the adulation of “Western democracy,” and Henry Kissinger. Nothing in this film is remotely credible.

2. Loyal Friend

Never work with animals or late period Bill Murray. Loyal Friend is a sentimental mush fest about a woman inheriting her late friend’s dog. She hates the dog at first (but still accepts it for no obvious reason), but can you guess if she gets to love it by the end of the film? This is a film about the obnoxiously wealthy whose arrogant behaviour we are expected to admire. It states that its characters are intelligent without any of them saying anything of any intelligence. It is not just predictable. It is dull.

1. After the Hunt

I saw a number of films in 2025 which were a waste of my time. After the Hunt was the only one which truly offended me. It is Luca Guadagnino’s take on #MeToo. And guess what? Guadagnino has nothing of interest to say of the systematic exclusion of women from academia. At best he’s saying “it’s complicated,” at worst it’s the women’s fault. This is the sort of film which some critics will laud for being daring, when it has an implausible and clichéd plot which just parrots the prejudices of the right wing media.

A year of militarism, rising right wing authoritarianism, and resistance 

Most read articles on theleftberlin.com in 2025


01/01/2026

Watercolor titled "Gargantua: Apologies to Honor Daumier." A large trump sits in the middle, mouth open as a golden stream of coins enters/exits his mouth. Elon Musk does a Nazi salute on his right. Investors smilingly accept the coins in the bottom left, a puppet holds the fate of various government programs at the bottom right. Armored police terrorize a lone protestor at the upper right. A ghostly figure next to a No Kings protestor says "Take this 2026".

2025 started in the middle of an election campaign, after the SPD-Green-FDP coalition collapsed in November. The elections were held in February, and the big winners were the right wing, with Friedrich Merz’s CDU gaining 28.5% of the vote, and the AfD 20.5%. All the ruling parties saw their vote fall, some dramatically. In contrast, Die Linke got 8.7%, nearly 3 times as many as what they were polling at at the beginning of the campaign.

The CDU-SPD coalition immediately went into attack mode and tried to make us pay for Germany’s failing economy. Police violence against Palestine demonstrators in Berlin and throughout Germany reached a worrying level. By the end of the year, Germany was building its military and making the first steps towards compulsory military service—steps which were resisted by a growing youth movement.

The increasing Nazification of the AfD, combined with its growing electoral support, led to a number of large demonstrations—against its party conference in Riesa in January, in Berlin in February, and against the formation of their street fighting youth organisation in Gießen in November. We will need to build more of these demonstrations in 2026.

As Israel continues to bomb Gaza (despite a so-called “ceasefire,” the world, and even Germany, saw mass actions for Palestine in front of the Bundestag in February, on Nakba Day in May, in Berlin in June with 60,000 demonstrators, and many more. 27th September saw Germany’s largest ever demonstration for Palestine, with between 100,000 and 150,000 taking to the streets.

Berlin saw a whole number of other internationalist demonstrations, including those for Congo in February and March, on International Women’s Day in March, for the Philippines and at Internationalist Queer Pride in July, and against Donald Trump’s attacks on Latin America in December.

We tried to cover all of this in our website and Newsletter, in which we introduced a new feature (“This week in working class history”). The list below tells you which articles you, our readers, read the most. It follows similar reports about 2022, 2023, and 2024. The statistics show an increasing number of people both reading and writing the articles. The 30 articles with 1,000 readers or more were written by 24 different authors.

We would like to encourage you to be a more active part of creating our website and Newsletter. In particular, we invite you to a face-to-face open meeting of our editorial board on 17th January, and our Fourth Left Journalism Day School on 21st February in Theater X. If you want to know more, you can contact us at team@theleftberlin.com. And if you are not already one of our 3,908 subscribers, you can subscribe to our Newsletter now.

Most viewed articles

#1 The Confused and Contradictory politics of Nico (1938-1988), Phil Butland (7,600 views) 

Our most viewed article of 2025 was first published in November 2024. Following 2 articles of pen portraits of the radical activists and artists buried in Berlin’s cemeteries, Phil Butland wrote a longer biography of solo artist and occasional Velvet Underground singer Nico. The article covers Nico’s radical music, together with her less savoury politics, including racism, nationalism, and internalised misogyny.

Excerpt: “Good politics can inspire good music, but there is no direct relationship between the two. Wagner was a great composer and an antisemite, Ezra Pound a great poet and a Fascist. David Bowie produced some of his greatest works when he was calling for a new Hitler and raping underage girls.”

#2: Boycott of Berghain: from March 2024 to now, Antifascist Music Alliance (5,699 views)

Also written in November 2024 (and our fourth most read article last year), this analysis by the Antifascist Music Alliance, which was updated in January, continued to find an audience. It looks at Berghain’s active role in the suppression of pro-Palestine acts and the boycott organised by Ravers for Palestine. Antifascist Music Alliance interviewed the artists supporting the boycott and called for bigger names to do the same.

Excerpt: “As we’ve seen in other solidarity efforts, it’s those with the least wealth, structural privilege and access that are standing with Palestine. It’s not a coincidence that these are generally also the artists that are pushing techno and other forms into the future.”

#3 Berlin’s Antideutsch Bars Love Israel but Don’t Like Jews, Nathaniel Flakin (4,691 views)

In February, as pro-Israel bars in Berlin launched a campaign against so-called “threats, violence, and boycott,” Nathaniel Flakin interviewed Jewish activist Yuval Carasso who had attended a meeting about antisemitism in Bajszel bar and been violently ejected from the event for being the “wrong sort of Jew.” Carasso was then arrested, but the case by the police was thrown out of court.

Excerpt: “when the audience had the chance to ask questions, Udi Raz asked if there were any Jewish people present. She was the only person who raised her hand. The only other Jews in the room were me, who had already been kicked out.”

#4 Europe is preparing for war, Gabriel Helfenstein (3,808 views)

In October, as Europe prepared for war and Germany introduced the first stages towards conscription, Helfenstein looked at the drive to militarisation. Helfenstein argued that violence is being normalised as a way of encouraging us to accept wars in the (potentially) near future. The German Zeitenwende is an important part of this, especially in Germany whose history has encouraged a feeling of pacifism.

Excerpt: “War is not just a single event to prepare for, it is an ongoing situation that requires the cooperation of a whole society. For war to happen, people must be ready to fight, while others must cheer for the soldiers—or at the very least look away. It requires a profound change in culture.

#5 The philosemitic Delusions of Sascha Lobo, Dan Weissmann (2,684 views)

In another old article (and 9th most read last year), Weissmann’s dissection of Sascha Lobo from April 2024 remains relevant as Lobo plays the role of Zionism’s clown prince in the German media. Lobo demanded dismantling UNRWA, which he claimed had overlapping interest with Hamas. Unsurprisingly, if depressingly, Lobo still has a column in Der Spiegel and is a sought-after public speaker.

Excerpt: “The assumption that Jews can only be safe in an ethnostate that metes out violence onto others is an implicit and, from Lobo’s worldview where Israel is the eternal victim, paradoxical admission that Jews can only be safe if they become perpetrators of mass violence themselves.

#6 The AfD and Israel, Isobel White (2,457 views) 

In an article from May 2024, which is as relevant as ever, White looked at the AfD’s links with Israel. Although the party is riddled with antisemites, its Islamophobia and anti-migrant rhetoric has led it to find common cause with the apartheid State. Isobel goes on to argue that the AfD’s Nazi links and derision for Holocaust victims means that it can offer no protection for Jewish people, whatever it says about Israel.

Excerpt: “A party that will so readily turn human lives into political pawns, atrocities into justification for bigotry, is a true danger to society, both in Germany and abroad. It is further proof that the AfD’s only real political convictions are fear-mongering and xenophobic hatred.”

#7 Dominick Fernow (Prurient) Releases Split Album with Neo-Nazi Band Genocide Organ, Antifascist Music Alliance (2,432 views)

Another old article by the Antifascist Music Alliance, this time from June 2023. This article shows that despite its clampdown on pro-Palestine artists (see above), Berghain, and its label Ostgut were much more indulgent of neo-Nazi Dominick Fernow and his KKK-supporting band Genocide Organ. When confronted about this, Berghain, Resident Advisor, and Pitchfork all refused to respond.

Excerpt: Genocide Organ has released KKK and neo-nazi music, like their 1998 album Klan Kountry, with cover art featuring a Confederate flag. Some song titles from other albums include White Power Forces, Woman Is Meat, and John Birch Society, referencing a far-right extremist group in the US.

#8 What are the CDU Promising this Election?, Rowan Gaudet (2,390 views)

Published in December 2024, as the election campaign was kicking off, Rowan Gaudet looked through the CDU/CSU’s manifesto. Rowan looked at CDU leader (and current Chancellor) Friedrich Merz’s sexist record, and correctly predicted a government of austerity, militarisation, and cuts in social services, including attacks on the unemployed and tax benefits for landlords and the rich.

Excerpt: ”any CDU-led government will need to be widely opposed … As crucial is opposing the austerity measures which would strip safe housing and continue to slowly destroy Germany’s hospitals and Kitas, not to mention reduced building regulations putting families at risk for generations to come.”

#9 Book Review: Perfect Victims by Mohammed El-Kurd, The Left Berlin (1,949 views)

In one of last year’s best books, Mohammed El-Kurd explained how and why the Western media dehumanise all Palestinians—including supporters of Hamas. He argued that all Palestinians should be heard, that the media must explain and understand Palestinians who feel provoked into violent reaction, and not just those which the West have deemed to be “good.” We reviewed Mohammed’s book in March.

Excerpt: Why is it that Palestinians are expected to constantly temper their grief and rage toward them, as they collect their loved ones’ limbs in bags? Does it change the quality of Israeli atrocities against them? Or in other words, must victims be ‘good’ and possess all the ‘right’ views to deserve human rights, to deserve life?” 

#10 Inciting Hatred and Slinging Insults: Exploring the Legal Apparatus of the BRD, Jason Oberman (1,926 views) 

In March and April, Jason Oberman published 3 articles about Germany’s legal apparatus. The first article was the most popular. It explains Volksverhetzung, a hate speech law often used by the Berlin police. Jason looked at the history of the Volksverhetzung, and argued that, although it has always been used as an instrument of repression, its use against pro-Palestine protestors have reached a new level.

Excerpt: “As antisemitism has been redefined to mean Palestinian people, Muslims, leftist Jews and critics of state violence and genocide, one must wonder how far we have come from Germany’s darkest years. As we keep exploring the history of this law, we must realize with heavy hearts, we have not come very far at all.”

Other articles with more than 1,000 readers

#11 Wolt Claims to be Apolitical but its Actions Suggest Otherwise, The Left Berlin (1,918 views)

#12 When British pubs said “Black Troops Only”, Judy Cox (1,906 views). First published: July 2022  (#22 last year)

#13 What is the point of German Memory Culture when it has no universal application?, Phil Butland (1,855 views). First published:  May 2025

#14 Wartime Survival Guide, Ilya Kharkow (1,841 views). First published:  July 2024

#15 “It’s Not About Us”,  Phil Butland and Tigris Vici (1,759 views). First published: May 2025

#16 Ibrahim Traoré: A new dictator or true socialist revolutionary?, Milla Mallikas (1,647 views). First published: July 2025

#17 Is This Fascism? For Palestine, Yes, Wael Eskander (1,516 views). First published:  May 2025

#18 Statement by The Left Berlin on Die Linke, The Left Berlin (1,510 views). First published:  November 2024

#19 Yes, the German Democratic Republic was socialist—and we have much to learn from it, Internationale Forschungsstelle DDR (1,307 views). First published: September 2025

#20 Against the Weaponisation of Antisemitism to Impose Censorship in Education, The Left Berlin (1,224 views).  First published:  January 2025

#21 Opinion: I’m done with ‘statements’, JD Vans (1,181 views). First published: March 2025

#22 From the Bogside to Brexit—The Long Shadow of Bloody Sunday, The Left Berlin (1,180 views).  First published: January 2022

#23 Red Flag: Your tax money for Israeli war propaganda, Nathaniel Flakin (1,179 views). First published: September 2025

#24 Germany vs. the Ulm 5, Roser Garí Pérez (1,150 views). First published: December 2025

#25 Divided solidarity: The two Pro-Gaza marches in Berlin and the question of unity, Rafael Sergi (1,129 views). First published: October 2025

#26 Queer festival ‘Whole’ and the political significance of clubbing, Rafael Sergi (1,111 views). First published: September 2024

#27 Red Flag: Watermelons at the Fusion Festival, Nathaniel Flakin (1,104 views). First published: July 2025

#28 The key to normalising fascism: selective solidarity, Boldizsar M. Nagy (1,047 views). First published: April 2025

#29 Riders without rights, TG Durutti (1,036 views). First published: July 2025

#30 Should We Boycott No Other Land?, Phil Butland (1,002 views). First published: March 2025

Femicides in Germany

Racist instrumentalization of violence against women and actual pathways to Women’s security


30/12/2025

This year in Germany, at least 132 women and two girls were killed in femicides. While using women’s security to push its racist agenda, the CDU is only endangering women even more.

As the end of December approaches, and about one month after the International Day for the Elimination of Gender-based violence, it is time to look back at the situation for women in Germany this year. One thing has not changed compared to previous years: women are still killed for being women—this year, at least 134. 

While the CDU claims to defend women’s rights, it simultaneously endangers women by cutting the very budgets meant to protect them and by instrumentalizing women’s rights to justify racist policies. Fighting femicide is only possible by increasing funding for women’s projects and finally paying women (fairly) for the (unpaid) work they do.

In Germany, there is no legal term for femicide. It is however described by the Istanbul Convention, signed by Germany in 2018, as the killing of a woman because of her gender. Under this definition, two different kinds of femicides are sometimes distinguished: when women are killed for a sexist motive—for example, because they do not follow typical gender roles—and when women are killed because their position in society makes them vulnerable to such killings—for example, because of their lack of financial independence or their care duties.

The definition of femicide is still broad and leads to different ways of counting femicides, as there are different ways of identifying the motivations behind the killings. The quickest way to shed light on femicide is to look at press reports and count the cases of women killed by someone they knew. This is what onebillionraising.de does, and this is where the number of 134 girls and women comes from. 

Another way of getting statistics on femicides is to use criminal and police statistics. This allows access to more cases than press reports but has the drawback that the waiting time to get the data is a bit longer. In the “Femicide in Germany” report, the German Institute for Human Rights analyzed criminal and police statistics in order to quantify and analyze femicides in Germany. 

What the authors find is that in 2024 in Germany, 824 women and girls were victims of attempted femicides. This means that in 2024, there were more than 2 attempts per day to kill a woman. 300 of these attempts were perpetrated by the victims’ partner or ex-partner. In Germany in 2024, almost every day a woman or a girl was the victim of a killing attempt by her partner or ex-partner. Moreover, 144 perpetrators were family members of the victims.

This means that more than 50% of attempted killings of women come from the close circle of the victim. By comparison, less than 15% of attempted killings of men were perpetrated by their (ex-)partner or family members. This indicates that the place where women are least safe is the private space and contradicts the racist uses of feminism by right-wing actors, who argue that the real threat to Western women comes from immigrants in public spaces. The most dangerous people for women are their (ex-)partners or family members. In Berlin, however, CDU mayor Kai Wegner decided to close the Görlitzer Park at night after an accusation of rape in the park. He did so while reducing the budget for women’s projects and spaces, spaces that are crucial in fighting femicides, as they offer an escape to the outside for women who are victims of violence in the private sphere. Moreover, in 2024, the CDU closed two girls’ projects in Berlin Kreuzberg-Friedrichshain because of the private engagement of some of its workers against the genocide in Palestine, a genocide in which thousands of women are killed with German weapons. 

Indeed, a recent study on femicide in Germany shows that the lack of places in women’s shelters (buildings dedicated to women who are victims of domestic violence) is decisive in femicide: several cases analyzed occurred because of failed attempts to secure a place in a women’s shelter. According to German law, the country should have 21,000 places in women’s shelters to protect women against domestic violence, but it currently only has 7,000–8,000. Moreover, other spaces are crucial to protect women from domestic violence and femicides, such as cultural spaces or (legal) advice centers, as they allow women to maintain connections with the outside world while being at risk in the private sphere. Education and support programs for violent men are also needed, as well as educational programs for children, to combat sexist violence. By cutting the budget for women’s spaces—including shelters and associative projects that provide women with a connection to the outside—the CDU thus decides to endanger women and put them even more at risk, while using their security as a fake argument to pursue its racist agenda and criminalize people of color living in or spending time in Görlitzer Park at night.

At the national level, a new law introduced by the Greens and the SPD has been passed with the support of the CDU. It will provide more funding for women’s shelters and new rights for women who are victims of domestic violence. This, however, will only come into effect in… 2032. In the meantime, men continue to kill women: this year, at least 134.

Finally, women’s shelters and women’s projects won’t do the job alone: women will only be safe once they are financially independent from men. This is only possible by achieving economic equality between men and women. Currently, women are paid 16% less than men in Germany. This gap is even larger for women of color and does not take into account the reproductive work that women do for free. It also does not capture the full extent of economic inequality, as other factors play a role, such as the unequal distribution and taxation of money in heterosexual marriages. Providing fair wages for care and reproductive work, which is disproportionately performed by women, often migrant women and either unpaid or poorly paid, is one of the many necessary steps to achieve economic equality between men and women, and, with it, to protect women from violence by men This, however, is only possible by changing the structure of the capitalist system, which relies on the exploitation of women, and especially women of color, in order to persist.

We won’t achieve security for women by racist measures, and the CDU won’t defend our rights. Moreover, we want more than the weak law pushed by the SPD and the Greens. What we wish for in 2026 to fight femicide in Germany is therefore an immediate increase in the budget to protect women when they are at risk by creating more places in women’s shelters and financing women’s projects instead of cutting their budgets. But also, and perhaps even more importantly, we want women to finally get paid (fairly) for their work so that they are independent from the greatest danger they face: the men in their private spaces. 

1 January 1994: Zapatista Uprising

This week in working class history

On 1 January 1994, the presidents of the USA, Canada and Mexico launched the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA removed trade restrictions and opened up Mexico to exploitation by the so-called “free” market. Mexican president Carlos Salinas had prepared the way with a massive privatisation plan four years earlier. In 1992, Salinas repealed Article 27, which had enabled peasants to use disused land.

1 January also saw the Zapatista uprising in Chiapas. Mayan Indigenous people took control of four cities, including San Cristóbal de las Casas. They demanded land reform, Indigenous rights and democracy. The EZLN, which led the uprising, was named after the Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata. The spokesperson for the movement was its masked leader, Subcomandante Marcos, who announced that the EZLN were fighting not only for Mayan rights, but against global neoliberalism.

Addressing movements in other countries, Marcos issued a statement declaring:
“We are you. Marcos is gay in San Francisco, black in South Africa, an Asian in Europe, a Chicano in San Ysidro, an anarchist in Spain, a Palestinian in Israel, a Mayan Indian on the streets of San Cristóbal, a Jew in Germany, a Gypsy in Poland, a Mohawk in Quebec, a pacifist in Bosnia, a single woman on the streets of the metro at 10pm, a peasant without land, a gang member in the slums, an unemployed worker, an unhappy student.”

The Zapatistas became a symbol of the international struggle against globalisation. They organised the first major defeat for Western capitalism after the fall of the Eastern Bloc in 1989. They forced the Mexican government to make concessions, including improved healthcare and sanitation and increased farm prices. However, following pressure from multinational corporations, most of these agreements were never respected.

As a result of the Zapatista uprising, the PRI ruling party lost its first presidential election in seven decades. It was replaced by the right-wing PAN. When the PRI returned to government, it continued to impose cuts and privatised the national oil company, PEMEX, in 2013. The Zapatistas said they were building autonomous spaces and were not interested in taking state power. Unfortunately, this left neoliberal capitalism firmly in control of Mexico. We should celebrate their victories and learn from their mistakes.

The currency of celebrity loyalty, from Minaj to Reiner

The responsibility (and cost) of wielding influence with empathy


28/12/2025

Michelle Singer Reiner and Robert Reiner posing at an event.

Rap star Nicki Minaj officially joined the ranks of MAGA during Turning Point USA’s America Fest convention. Accompanying Charlie Kirk’s widow Erika onstage, she heaped extravagant praise upon President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance. Not so long ago, Minaj was heartily critical of Trump, particularly in response to his attitude towards immigrants; then, during the pandemic, she began spouting anti-vaccination rhetoric—an indicator for the descent into an alt-right grifting career. While Minaj following this path isn’t totally surprising, listening to her dub Trump as a “dashing, handsome […] role model” was not on my 2025 Bingo Card.

Many online have—probably accurately—designated this as Certified Broke Behavior. Some have posited that she’s cosying up to the Tangerine Man in the hopes he will pardon her husband for crimes including attempted rape and failure to register as a sex offender. It’s shudder-inducing to watch anyone fawn over Trump, and the sheer transparency of it is cringeworthy. Even worse is that he laps it up. Trump, a man who ought to operate with a modicum of class and decency and sophistication—as any President should—preens and poses and rewards loyalty of any kind with oily words and metaphorical head-pats. He doesn’t even care if loyalty and praise stems from an authentic place. What he expects is a bend of the knee and a toe of the line. Bend to his power and submit to his regime, and you’re in with MAGA. 

In 2025 the topic of celebrity endorsement was dwelled-on with vigor. Some consider it to be the duty of the rich and famous: their privilege and exposure give them the unique power to step to the government in a tangible way. Others push back against this, insisting that pop stars and actors should stick to their own sphere and restrain themselves from attempting to sway the political landscape. Taylor Swift received both criticism and defence when she did not speak out against the official White House Tiktok using one of her new songs for the United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) agency. The anger towards her silence was exacerbated by the fact that younger pop girls Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter both swiftly and angrily denounced the usage of their art for such a cause. Be it complacency or a lesson in emotional intelligence, the incident drove an extra-charged train of discourse through the planes of the entertainment industry’s overlap with politics. 

I can understand that acknowledging Trump and his administration’s antics can sometimes only stoke their flames. Like a typical schoolyard bully, they prod incessantly with the intent to provoke frustration, fury, despair. They don’t just like to make bruises, they want to press at them until their opponent yelps. That being said, with the Trump administration wheeling out any celebrity who is willing to lay at its feet for a chunk of change, it feels important to have equally powerful counterparts who signal resistance. Even when that resistance can feel fluffy, or a trifle performative, it can do wonders for a cause. Pop Princess and Wicked star Ariana Grande shared a link to the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund on her instagram story in 2024, which reportedly saw a significant spike in donations. Grammy darling Billie Eilish called out billionaires for their excessive greed in an impassioned speech at the Wall Street Journal Innovator Awards before donating $11.5 million to charities focused on food security and climate justice. The late actor Robert Redford staunchly endorsed the Democrats and opposed Trump’s reelection until his death this year. And the recently deceased director Robert Reiner and his wife, photographer and producer Michele Singer Reiner, were deeply entrenched in politics for decades, prompting comments from the President so loathsome and classless that even his Republican peers have recoiled. 

The aforementioned Erika Kirk, whom Minaj joined onstage, lost her husband Charlie on 10 September 2025. The right-wing influencer was assassinated during an outdoor campus debate at Utah Valley University. Rob Reiner’s politics could not possibly have further diverged from Kirk’s; they stood firmly on opposite ends of the political spectrum. And yet, during an interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Reiner was horrified by the murder, unequivocally condemning the assassination: “that should never happen to anybody. I don’t care what your political beliefs are.”

The Singer Reiners were discovered in their California home and their cause of death was pronounced as homicide. Their son Nick was accused of murdering them and is currently being held in custody. The news was the sort of tragedy that can barely be approached with words. The stark dreadfulness of it; the shocking, relentless surrealness. The chronically online are usually a verbose set, but when the story broke, the comment section was dumbstruck. Instead of platitudes, there were remote, helpless comments, unable to grasp the immensity of reaction. 

I expect very little from Trump. Few who lean my way politically do. He has shown himself to be a power-hungry, vulgar buffoon, boasting narcissistic tendencies and an insatiable hunger for oppressing those who question the status quo. His response when questioned about the death of the Reiners, though: it still had the power to startle me. 

Taking to Truth Social, he described Reiner as “a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, [who] has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS.” Friends and admirers of Reiner, including celebrated director James Cameron, met the comments with undistilled anger. The Hill reported that almost two-thirds of Americans considered the statement “inappropriate.” I briefly visited conservative forums online—whose users often play Devil’s Advocate for Trump et. al.—and even those threads were unable to see such a reaction in a positive or neutral stance. 

I prefer to refrain from weaponizing therapy-talk, but I don’t think you could conjure up a more fitting case-study for projection than the President of the United States. Alleging that Reiner caused others anger and suffered from derangement? I doubt anybody this year has caused more fury and shown themselves to be more unhinged than Trump. In every public address, every interview, every post made online, he provokes without the slightest whiff of subtlety, he meanders alarmingly, he presents us with baffling word-salads instead of simple answers to questions. He’s shown himself to be reactive, snarling at a reporter who asked an Epstein-related question to “quiet, piggy.”

A lot of Trump’s outrageous antics this year seem to be deliberate attempts to distract from the release of the Epstein Files. It’s a role well-suited to Trump, even if it didn’t come about by design but necessity. Since day dot of his initial bid for Presidency, Trump employed the crude tactic of diversion and subtraction to tremendous effect. Seeing as the tranche of files are being released—slowly and with a high volume of redactions—his diversions may become even wilder. Regardless of whether he really meant it or not, though, what he said probably rings true to what he feels. I won’t say believes, because I don’t think anybody as abjectly cruel and egomaniacal as him really holds beliefs. But I do think he feels, fundamentally, that those who oppose him—and anyone who cannot be of immediate use to him—are disposable. Those who see him for what he is—Rob Reiner declared Trump as “mentally unfit” to serve as President—are to be disassembled, shunned, and slandered without a shred of empathy or humanity. We should expect so little from Trump, but his post reverberated around the world nonetheless. That such a needless, fathomless, abyssal tragedy was incapable of permeating Trump’s viciousness underlined what many already knew: empathy is to the US President what sodium is to water.

The Singer Reiners seemed to have empathy by the truckload. While many celebrity endorsements begin and end with a fat cheque and a photo-op, the couple were steadfast in their philanthropic and political efforts for much of their careers. They put their money and their time where their mouths were. Rob was instrumental in overturning bans on same-sex marriage; he later said that Michele was the driving force behind his passion for the cause. Together the couple propelled forward a tobacco tax in California providing funding for early childhood programs. In her final years, Michele worked with those who had been wrongfully convicted via the Innocence Project, showing a commitment to a fair and equitable justice system. By all accounts, the pair felt deeply and used their humanity and conscience to guide their lives. It would have been possible for them to live a charmed and superficial life, perched atop of Hollywood amidst the glitz and glamour. They could have avoided the residue of a burning world around them and become engulfed in their own privilege. But they didn’t. And while they left too soon and in a manner deserved by no-one, they left a legacy that matters, and reminds us that change can come from the force of belief and determined, consistent action. 

I don’t think that talent is a virtue. Bad people can make good art and good people can make bad art. I also don’t think we should treat the Hollywood elite like royalty. That being said, it takes empathy and humanity to craft the kind of films Reiner directed, and that talent ought to be celebrated. When Harry Met Sally, The Princess Bride, Stand By Me: while all different, they are stories brimming with love and longing, friendship and affection. Whether under the rusty canopy of Central Park or the desolate countryside of a childhood, they are worlds formed with warmth and care. Even Misery, the psychological horror thriller featuring a chilling performance by Kathy Bates, is evocative and frighteningly moving, a sinister foray into the psyche of an obsessive fan-girl. The magic of these films is probably lost on Trump and his cronies, the feckless billionaires who deal only with unfettered power, explosive, havoc-wreaking fuels, and ever-rising bank accounts, who see art as easily replaced by AI slop.

Not every celebrity or high-profile individual will be capable of, or inclined to, embrace political and social issues as Rob and Michele did. What they have left behind them shows the power of those with higher profiles engaging with causes beyond solitary donations (although of course donations should not be sniffed at). Maybe it shines a light on the question of duty that many grappled with this year: maybe it confirms that, yes, while pop stars and Oscar winners and Grammy darlings and producers and filmmakers should not decide a vote or a stance for you, their inextricable link with the culture should be harnessed for good. That any artist worth their salt should have the compassion so sorely lacking by the billionaire bigwigs, and not only use it to create works that allow us to transcend, but use it to drive social change and remind us that there is more than one regime. 

In the end, the question isn’t whether celebrities should endorse or abstain. It’s whether power is exercised with any sense of responsibility to others. Trump’s orbit thrives on empty loyalty: praise given for proximity to power, devotion rewarded without conviction, empathy treated as weakness. Minaj’s turn toward MAGA is jarring not because it is unique, but because it exemplifies how easily influence can be stripped of meaning and repurposed for self-preservation.

Rob and Michele Singer Reiner offered a different model. Their politics were not costumes donned for attention or leverage, nor were they contingent on applause. They were sustained, imperfect, deeply human commitments to fairness, dignity, and care. In a culture increasingly shaped by spectacle, grievance, and transactional allegiance, their legacy reminds us that influence is not measured by proximity to power, but by what (and who) it ultimately serves. Empathy may not win elections, curry favor, or trend online. But without it, no amount of talent, fame, or authority means anything at all.