The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Rosa Luxemburg Grave in Berlin Defaced

AfD’s Rise Fuels Fascist Attacks


15/03/2025

As the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) surges in the polls, street-level right wing foot soldiers are growing bolder — attacking those from a migrant background, left-wing activists, and now even the memory of past struggles. One of their latest targets? The Memorial for Socialists in Berlin’s Friedrichsfelde Cemetery, a site dedicated to revolutionaries Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, and other socialist martyrs. In a blatant act of political vandalism, right wing thugs have removed the plaques bearing Luxemburg and Liebknecht’s names.

Let’s be clear — this isn’t just a case of petty vandalism. It’s part of a growing far-right assault on history itself. The far right, including the fascist wing of the AfD want to rewrite Germany’s past, downplay the horrors of fascism, and silence anyone who stands for socialism, anti-racism, and working-class solidarity.  Björn Höcke, who heads AfD in the eastern state of Thuringia, told supporters that Germans were the “only people in the world who planted a memorial of shame in the heart of their capital” (referring to the Holocaust memorial near Brandenburg gate: ed). This attack on Luxemburg and Liebknecht’s graves is just the latest front in that fight.

The Friedrichsfelde memorial site has deep roots in socialist history. A monument originally designed in 1926 by modernist architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and financed by selling postcards in working class districts, was commissioned by the German Communist Party (KPD) as a defiant tribute to those murdered in the struggle for socialism. But the Nazis destroyed it in 1935 after first removing the red star that stood on top of it. After Hitler’s fall, the GDR state built a smaller monument to Luxemburg, Liebknecht and the other militants buried there. Later in 1951 the Memorial for Socialists was built, incorporating the names of Luxemburg and Liebknecht with members of the GDR state leadership.

Today, the site is more than just a historical monument — it’s a symbol of resistance. Every January, thousands of socialists, trade unionists, and anti-fascists march through Berlin for the annual Luxemburg-Liebknecht demonstration, ending at Friedrichsfelde.

The removal of Luxemburg, Liebknecht and others name plaques from the Memorial for Socialists is no accident. It’s an attempt to bury the revolutionary legacy, just as the Nazis tried nearly a century ago. And it comes at a time when the AfD is gaining ground, spouting nationalist, racist rhetoric while pretending to be a “respectable” party. But on the streets, fascists and right wingers are harassing migrants, attacking leftists, and defacing anti-fascist memorials.

So what do we do? We fight back. Words alone won’t stop the far right — mass mobilisation will. Trade unions, socialists, and anti-fascists must take to the streets, defend our history, and push back against this new wave of fascist violence. The memory of Luxemburg and Liebknecht belongs to the working class, and no amount of vandalism can erase their ideas.

The fight against fascism is happening now, and it’s up to all of us to make sure history doesn’t repeat itself.

“When the banality of evil becomes normalized, it grows unchecked.”

A conversation with UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese

February tends to be a pretty harsh time of year in Berlin. Freezing temperatures, short days, and perpetually gray skies weigh heavy upon the city’s inhabitants, amplifying an already fraught atmosphere in Germany. Amidst a persistently bleak economic outlook, the country is undergoing a sharp rightward shift, with traditional parties increasingly mirroring the rhetoric of the far-right AfD, to the point where the distinctions between them are becoming negligible.

This shift has been accompanied by the criminalization and escalating repression of any movement, initiative, or individual criticizing the Israeli government’s actions, or expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people — the victims of what numerous experts describe as an ongoing genocide. The crackdown has only deepened existing tensions: anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment is rampant, while reports of police violence, arbitrary arrests of pro-Palestine demonstrators, dismissals of individuals for publicly supporting Palestine, and defamatory accusations of antisemitism are countless.

Yet, never before has such repression targeted a high-ranking UN official — not until a series of events that featured Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, became the subject of a coordinated campaign to force their cancellation.

The first event — titled Colonialism, Human Rights, and International Law — was scheduled to be held on February 16, at the Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) in Munich. Just days before, the event was abruptly cancelled by the university, who cited the event’s “political orientation” and vaguely defined “security concerns”. The nature of these supposed risks remains unclear.

On February 19, Albanese was set to speak alongside the director of Forensic Architecture — Israeli-British scholar Eyal Weizman — at another event, titled Calculated Living Conditions to Destroy — Legal and Forensic Perspectives on the Ongoing Genocide in Gaza. This time, the suppression was even more blatant. The standard justifications (such as “polarization” or “security risks”) collapsed, when it emerged that Günter Ziegler (the President of the Freie Universität Berlin) had been directly pressured by Ron Prosor (the Israeli Ambassador to Germany), Kai Wegner (the Mayor of Berlin, CDU), and the group “WerteInitiative. jüdisch-deutsche Positionen” (which claims to work for “a future for Jews in Germany”). The ambassador reportedly wrote directly to Ziegler demanding the event’s cancellation, while Wegner called for its shutdown in Bild — Germany’s most-read newspaper, inexplicably still treated as credible despite its far-right leanings. WerteInitiative, for their part, accused Albanese of “spreading antisemitic worldviews” in a letter to the university. The coordinated effort achieved its goal: the event was canceled.

A third event, organized by the DiEM25 political alliance in collaboration with Jüdische Stimme, Eye4Palestine, and Gaza Komitee Berlin, was scheduled for February 18, at KühlhausBerlin, with the title Reclaiming the Discourse: A Powerful Stand for Palestine, Justice, and Truth. Despite the prior cancellations, the organizers remained confident that the event would proceed as planned. But on the morning of February 18, it became evident this was no longer the case. Under “immense pressure from German politicians and the Berlin police”, the venue withdrew support. Overnight, the main entrance to Kühlhaus was also vandalized with spray-painted messages: Albanese, you are an antisemite, and UNRWA supports terror.

At the eleventh hour, the Berlin-based Marxist newspaper junge Welt stepped in, offering its premises as an alternative venue, though with a drastically reduced capacity. That morning, ticket holders received an email warning that the police had requested access to the gathering — a chilling prospect, given last year’s Palestine Congress in Berlin, which was forcibly shut down by police, leading to multiple arrests. This time, authorities allowed the event to proceed, only under the condition that five police officers be present throughout, ostensibly to “protect freedom of speech” and to ensure that speakers and attendees did not violate the law. The lecture proceeded peacefully without excessive interference.

Amidst this unprecedented crackdown, we spoke with Francesca Albanese about her experience in Germany, the state of fundamental rights in the country, and the current situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Let’s start with your experience in Germany, and the political and police pressure that you faced. Did you anticipate this level of repression? Have you ever encountered anything similar?

Political pressure is always present, but usually it’s not directed at me personally. Pro-Israel lobby groups are deeply entrenched in the West, operating in similar ways everywhere: they aim to silence or ignore voices like mine. In Italy, for example, I’m simply disregarded. However, civil society ensures that events proceed despite the pressure. In most countries, universities wouldn’t consider canceling an event.

In my three years of speaking about Palestine in around twenty countries, I’ve never encountered anything like in Germany. The real pressure isn’t just on me — it’s on Germans themselves. This is outright censorship and self-censorship. I was shocked by the level of repression at the event I was part of. It wasn’t physical violence against me, and I’m immune to slander, misogyny, and personal attacks. What struck me was the silencing effect on Germans.

For the first time in three years, I felt fear. And I’ve lived with security protection, received death threats, yet I’ve never felt this way. In Germany I sensed something profoundly disturbing — an atmosphere reminiscent of historical accounts of fascism, where people fear speaking out. That’s why I used the expression “lack of oxygen”.

Have you noticed the situation in Germany worsening, since we last met in May?

Yes. Last year I gave multiple interviews, met Foreign Ministry officials, think tanks, and dozens of NGOs. Some criticized me, but many expressed gratitude. This year? Silence. I met only three NGOs. Many wanted to speak behind closed doors, fearful of repression.

I wonder: what changed? Last year I was one of the few calling out the Gaza genocide so forcefully. Now, major organizations — including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Forensic Architecture, and individuals of the caliber of Amos Goldberg — have confirmed what I’ve said. Yet I’m somehow perceived as more controversial than ever. But the difference is not in me, it’s in German society itself, after months of crackdowns: police brutality, arrests, home raids, and a climate of fear that spreads rapidly.

As Michael Barenboim and other participants in the event noted, Germany strongly identifies with Israel, which is understandable given its history. But when that identification blinds one to crimes being committed in the name of an ideology, it means repeating the mistakes of the past rather than learning from them. That, I believe, is the real issue.

As an expert in human rights and international law, how do you assess the current violations of individual freedoms in Germany, such as the freedom of expression and assembly?

The issue goes beyond Palestine, which is just the trigger. Germany has aligned itself so blindly to the idea of protecting Israel at all costs, as a pillar of its state identity, that it struggles to see reality for what it is, and fundamental freedoms are being sacrificed. So how do we reclaim these rights? Not by bowing our heads to fit into a repressive system. If hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets against the far-right, then three times as many should be protesting for their own fundamental rights. Academics should refuse to teach until the freedom of expression and academic freedom are restored. Media outlets that engage in defamation and intimidation should be taken to court. Civil society and NGOs should form a protective barrier against systemic abuses.

But now, in Germany, I don’t see this happening. Where is German civil society? Where are the organizations dedicated to fighting racism? Because that’s what this is — Islamophobia and anti-Arab sentiment are forms of racism. Recognizing this reality, in Germany and beyond, is the only way to reclaim and defend these rights. Awareness must be widespread, and action must follow.

Do you think an effective strategy could be to take legal action, namely turning to courts, the European Court of Human Rights or other organs?

Of course. You can appeal to a judge when your fundamental freedoms have been violated. I’ve raised this issue with several groups in Germany, and they say that in many cases, courts have ruled in favor of repression — I can’t comment on that because I don’t know the German legal system well enough.

What I do know is that I was shocked when — I believe it was from the District Court of Frankfurt — I was labeled an antisemite. That is pure and simple defamation. And yet, no one protested. A UN Special Rapporteur is insulted and slandered by a court, and there are no consequences? I can’t fight battles in every country. It should be up to civil society.

When the banality of evil becomes normalized, it grows unchecked. It can be contained at the national level through civil society and the judiciary. And if that fails, then yes, one must turn to international courts like the European Court of Human Rights. But these are long processes. In the meantime, the erosion of rights continues. That’s why I believe so strongly in mass mobilization.

In Germany, perhaps more than in other countries, one of the tools for restricting personal freedoms is the accusation of antisemitism. While antisemitism — like all forms of racism and discrimination — must be condemned and rejected in the strongest terms, this has become a defamatory and instrumental mechanism to silence dissent against the Israeli and German governments. Those who are targeted by these smears appear powerless and unable to defend themselves. Why do you think this happens?

I think it stems from confusion and guilt. When even those whose profession is critical thinking (such as academics) fail to exercise it, it means there is a trauma. That trauma is likely linked to Holocaust guilt. And I understand it — I feel it too as an Italian.

But it is precisely the guilt over the Holocaust that pushes me to do what I do, alongside fellow human rights activists, intellectuals and academics, many of whom are Jewish. Enough with this performative guilt that Germans display: “we did this, and therefore we cannot…” No — on the contrary, because of this history, you can and must act. And yet, what does Germany do? It doubles down on its support for the Israeli government, even as it commits the most heinous crimes.

After the last German elections, Friedrich Merz, the frontrunner to become the next German chancellor, called the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He publicly announced that he would seek to circumvent the ICC’s arrest warrant. Before Merz, Donald Tusk — the Polish Prime Minister — declared that Netanyahu would be welcome in Poland for the commemoration of the anniversary of Auschwitz’s liberation. At a time when the very existence of international law seems precarious, what do you think these stances signify?

There is a deeply concerning political dimension here — a blatant disdain for the international legal order. This is dangerous because it reinforces the perception of double standards, of a selective application of international law; of treating it as just another tool for international politics, rather than as the framework, the regulator — almost the thermostat — of international relations.

The political attitude of indifference and contempt toward international law is troubling in itself. This contributes to the erosion of the international criminal justice system, a system that took decades to build. Since the Nuremberg trials, efforts had been made to establish a permanent international court for crimes against humanity. Over the years, we saw international tribunals for (former) Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and hybrid courts, before the International Criminal Court was finally established. It was an incredible step forward. And now, we are witnessing a rollback, a dismantling of this progress.

The alarming speed at which this is happening is compounded by a third factor: a culture of impunity. There is no longer any fear — neither at the international level, nor regionally, nor in bilateral relations between states. A few dominant powers dictate the global order, overriding the reality of a multipolar world. Instead of harmonizing international relations and using law as a guiding compass, we are moving toward a world shaped by American imperialism — an imperialism that no longer hides its willingness to use military force whenever it sees fit. This is an extremely dangerous scenario — one of lawlessness. And we should all be deeply concerned.

Your latest report, Genocide as Colonial Erasure, has proven to be eerily prophetic. The violence in Gaza has never truly ceased, and it has expanded into the West Bank. A few days ago, the IDF entered the Jenin refugee camp with tanks, for the first time in twenty years. What is your current assessment of the situation?

The situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories is deeply alarming. The so-called ceasefire created the illusion that the emergency had passed. But humanitarian aid is not reaching people. Tents are not being delivered. Israel continues to fire at civilians in Gaza — over 100 people have been killed since the supposed ceasefire began. Meanwhile, Israel has made it clear that it will not withdraw from the Philadelphi Corridor, signalling its intention to fully entrap Gaza.

Israel must come to terms with the fact that it cannot continue to suppress the Palestinians — it must allow them to live, to be free. This is the lesson it should have learnt over the past 15-16 months, yet it refuses to acknowledge it.

At the same time, the situation in the West Bank is not fundamentally different from what is happening to the Palestinian people as a whole. In Gaza, the attack has been genocidal in its intensity, but the same logic of destruction is being applied in the West Bank — though in a way that garners less attention, with fewer visible explosions. Palestinian communities are being forcibly displaced, their homes demolished, their hospitals destroyed, their farmlands burned.

What worries me most is whether the world will recognize this genocide for what it is — the ability to see Israel’s violence as a systematic attack on the Palestinian people as a whole, across the entire occupied territory. Because that is exactly what it is.

In light of the escalation of violence and the situation you’ve described, Europe continues to appear divided and inadequate in its response to the ongoing emergency in Palestine. Have you noticed any evolution in Europe’s position (or that of the international community) that seems absent to us?

I don’t think it’s absent. I’d say there are three groups: those who act and take measures, like the members of the Hague Group or South Africa, and the other states that have filed a case at the International Court of Justice. They have taken action, especially the Hague Group. There are also some South American states that have suspended trade or military agreements with Israel — these are important steps. There are national-level divestment initiatives from companies operating in occupied territories. These actions matter, but they are still too isolated and not widespread enough.

Then, there is a minority of states — but they are very aggressive — led by the United States and Israel, followed by others. Sometimes it’s hard to tell where Israeli policy ends and U.S. policy begins. This core group is acting in flagrant violation of international law, and they don’t seem to care.

And then there’s the vast majority of states that vote against the occupation but still continue doing business with Israel, failing to take a firm stance. There are many such states.

I believe the situation won’t shift positively — meaning for the freedom and rights of all people — unless there is a massive mobilization. This is a systemic struggle, but unfortunately, people don’t see it. I keep saying it: we are at the potential tipping point of a necessary revolution. Right now, capitalism has armed itself — with technology, communication channels, cloud control, artificial intelligence, and weapons. Either we resist now, or it will be too late. Resisting in defense of rights is a necessary action at this moment.

The Israeli government is effectively dismantling UNRWA, an agency that emanates directly from the UN Security Council. Are there any sanctioning mechanisms or consequences for a UN member state’s actions against the UN itself?

No. Israel has been waging a legal and reputational war against the agency for 20 years. This campaign has intensified in recent years, with constant attacks accusing the agency of recruiting terrorists. Investigations have found no evidence to support claims that UNRWA staff were complicit in acts of violence against Israelis. Yet, even without proof, UNRWA dismissed those employees, going against its own rules.

Frankly, UNRWA has also contributed to its own downfall. As I’ve often said, UNRWA is its own worst defender. Israel has exerted pressure through all its supportive forces, including pro-Israel lobby groups operating in various Western countries. These groups have pushed for funding cuts to UNRWA, but the fiercest battle has been fought through Israeli legislation. This has been the most aggressive attack. In response, I don’t think there has been nearly enough effort to defend UNRWA. The agency should have received stronger support both internally and externally. The office in Jerusalem should never have been abandoned. UNRWA leadership ordered the evacuation, but I would have rather reinforced the presence of international staff. Instead, there seems to have been a retreat — perhaps out of exhaustion. But that’s not fair, because Palestinians are exhausted too.

In recent days, the American organization DAWN has asked the ICC to investigate the former U.S. President Joe Biden, the former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and the former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin for “aiding, abetting, and intentionally contributing to war crimes in Gaza”. How significant do you think this development is? Do you believe it’s realistic to expect an actual investigation?

I hope there will be one. The problem is that the Court is under enormous pressure — it has even been sanctioned by the United States. So I hope that this investigation is supported and receives all the necessary materials, but it won’t be easy to proceed.

I certainly think there are grounds to investigate U.S. political leaders, particularly the Biden administration, which has provided military, political, economic, and financial support to this genocide. They knew exactly what Israel was doing, and they supported it anyway.

So justice would absolutely be desirable. But the problem is, we don’t live in a just world. We don’t live in an equitable world. A just and equitable world must be built, and it takes the strength and awareness of everyone to do it.

Munich and Mannheim: A Tale of Two Car Attacks

Two German cities experienced acts of terrorism. The Muslim murderer was a “terrorist” — his far-right counterpart was “mentally ill.”


14/03/2025

The two attacks were remarkably similar: a man drives a car into a crowd of people, killing two and injuring many more. It happened on February 13 in Munich at a demonstration by striking public sector workers. It happened again on March 3 in the Mannheim city center.

Instead of focusing on the similarities (are cars the problem, or men?), German media and politicians have treated the cases completely differently.

The Munich attacker, originally from Afghanistan, had a copy of the Quran in his car. He was immediately called a “terrorist.” Both Afghan and Muslim associations were expected to distance themselves.

The Mannheim murderer, in contrast, is a white German. For the last ten days, cops and politicians have repeated the mantras “the motive remains unclear” and that there are “no links to extremism.” No German, Christian, or right-wing groups have had to condemn the violence.

The amount of reporting has been radically different as well. Within just a day, as soon as it became clear that the killer was white, the Mannheim attack disappeared from national news. A study shows that Mannheim got less than half as much press coverage as comparable attacks.

Even the language was notably different. Munich was universally referred to as an Attentat, an assassination or terrorist attack, but Mannheim got referred to as an “Auto fährt in the Menschenmenge” (a car driving into a of people crowd), as if the driver might have had a seizure and lost control.

It took just a day for the antifascist research group EXIF to publish a dossier about Alexander S. He has a conviction for posting Nazi slogans online. He has connections to an armed fascist group. He was photographed at a Nazi demonstration in Berlin in 2018. We wouldn’t know about any of this if we had relied on the authorities. 

It’s not that mass media are hiding this fact, exactly. Der Spiegel mentions the Nazi connection in an article — in the sixteenth paragraph.

Police say: Ok, but besides all this, we don’t have any additional evidence of extremist views. Instead, they point to the killer’s mental health problems. This is tautological — can’t we assume that anyone who drives a car into a crowd is having some issues? A Nazi can be psychologically unwell. 

The disturbing implication is that we are in a Huntington-style Clash of Civilizations, and for a Muslim, mass murder would be rational.

The German state simply refuses to acknowledge the pervasiveness of right-wing terrorism. Since 1990, at least 300 people have been murdered by Nazis. Yet each of these is treated as a “lone wolf” with no connections to broader society. Only when a killer is a migrant are we told that his deeds represent an entire “culture.”

Yet it’s widespread racism in German society that is inspiring people, including some with issues, to commit mass murder. Stochastic terrorism is the term when mainstream politicians dehumanize groups of people — and then individuals take such ideas to their rational conclusion. But German capitalist society refuses to look at the far-right views widespread in the police, the bourgeoisie, and the parliament.

After the Munich attack, there were calls to increase deportations and attack basic democratic and constitutional rights like the right to asylum. After the Mannheim attack, there was a brief frenzy, until it became clear the perpetrator was a Nazi — and then there was silence. The logical conclusion would be that we need to deport all right-wing Germans. We see what kind of violence AfD supporters are capable of! 

The only problem: Would anyone take them?

Note: Last week I wrote about the new German government’s plans to spend hundreds of billions of additional euros on the military. Next Tuesday, March 18, at 17:00 there will be a protest against the new war credits in front of the Bundestag. It is up to us to stop this new wave of German militarism.

Red Flag is a weekly column on Berlin politics that Nathaniel Flakin has been writing since 2020. After moving through different homes, it now appears every Friday at The Left Berlin.

ICHRP Welcomes Duterte’s Arrest: A Landmark Step Towards Justice

Statement from the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines


13/03/2025

The International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) welcomes the arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte for crimes against humanity. Duterte’s detention, following a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), marks an unprecedented step towards justice for the thousands of victims of his bloody war on the poor and war on dissent. 

“This is a historic moment for the victims and their families who have long suffered under Duterte’s reign of terror,” said ICHRP Chairperson Peter Murphy. “The arc of the moral universe is long, but today, it has bent towards justice. Duterte’s arrest is the beginning of accountability for the mass killings that defined his brutal rule.” 

Duterte’s drug war resulted in approximately 30,000 deaths and hundreds more civilians were killed in his counterinsurgency campaign, as documented by human rights groups, with many victims being extrajudicially executed in what amounted to state-sanctioned murder. Despite the Philippine government’s withdrawal from the ICC in March 2019, the court continued its investigation of alleged murder and torture cases up to that time. 

“Duterte once believed he was untouchable, but through the enduring demand for justice by the families of the victims, we are seeing that it will be soon served,” Murphy continued. “His arrest should serve as a stark warning to all war criminals, including those currently in power. There is always the possibility that the international community will finally act against leaders who trample on human rights and international humanitarian law. Impunity has limits,” said Murphy. 

After years of investigation and extensive evidence gathered by the International Peoples’ Tribunals, Investigate PH, and the UN Human Rights Council, alongside the filing of cases by victims and human rights groups to the International Criminal Court, the ICC has now issued a warrant and it has been executed. ICHRP will join the Filipino people in being vigilant and ensuring that true justice is served.  

“We also emphasize that there should be no special treatment for Duterte, as has been the norm for elite officials in the Philippines who have evaded justice through fabricated medical excuses and political maneuvering. The law must apply equally, and Duterte should face his day in court without preferential treatment,” said Murphy. 

ICHRP further calls on the Philippine government to fully cooperate with the ICC’s legal process and ensure Duterte has aa fair trial. “This is just the first step,” Murphy emphasized. “Justice for the victims demands not only Duterte’s conviction but also accountability for all those who enabled and who continue to execute his deadly policies and mechanisms of terror.” 

The arrest of Duterte sends a resounding message that crimes against humanity will not go unpunished. ICHRP remains steadfast in its commitment to seeking justice for all victims of human rights violations in the Philippines. 

The International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) is a global network of organizations, concerned about the human rights situation in the Philippines and committed to campaign for just and lasting peace in the country. For general inquires, contact us here, or by direct message on Facebook, Instagram, or X.

Protest Camp for Refugee Rights and Climate Justice

Statement by OPlatz Lebt!

OPlatz lebt! is here again to make the various struggles for refugee rights and climate justice visible! The current political discourse is heavily lead by fascist ideas, with authoritarian and right-wing forces are on the rise and the abolition of human rights is socially acceptable. The media and politics alike are increasingly dehumanising people of colour and migrants, while the climate crisis is unfolding and creating a future in which millions of people will be on the move due to their homes becoming unliveable. We want to stand against the ideas of a ‘fortress Europe’ that tries to sustain a perceived status quo of a white, middle-class EU – with the price being the lives of all those seeking for refuge from war, persecution and climate crisis.

The main demands accompanying the camp revolve around the living conditions of migrants and asylum seekers here in Germany. We demand a stop to deportations to guarantee refugees’ safety as well as an abolition of the Residence Obligation Law and the Bezahlkarte, which only serve to complicate asylum seekers’ lives. We demand a closure of all refugee camps and humane living conditions and the unconditional right to work and study for refugees to minimise dependency from the German state. Furthermore we demand a stop to the EU’s deadly border politics and recognition that war, persecution and climate change are forcing people to flee their homes and leave them in need for protection. Equal rights and an end to discrimination now!

In this political and economic climate, with inflation driving prices up to a point where the common citizen can barely survive, the European states keep sending money to border regimes, companies and mafias who make the process of asking for asylum a deadly game. Managing to enter the EU, refugees face a maze of inhumane living conditions, unfeasible bureaucracy and a racist system directed against them. A system that discriminates between different ‘kinds’ of refugees: White-passing Ukrainians, initially being treated very well, on the one side, stigmatised darker skinned asylum seekers from the so-called ‘middle-east’ and from all over the world on the other side. This othering divides the people further and keeps us busy fighting each other instead of the exploitative neoliberal capitalist system that destroys life in every form. We are here to bring climate justice to the political discourse to recognise the ways in which European hegemony and (neo)colonialist structures keep on destroying our planet and its various ecosystems.

The camp is in solidarity with all indigenous struggles and all refugees regardless of the reasons bringing them here.

This month of resistance is not just a protest, it’s a space for education, mobilisation and community building. We are here to make our voices heard, to reclaim our right to exist and to keep building the branches of the anti-colonialist, anti-border, anti-racist and anti-capitalist movement. Together, we are strong!