The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Judgement UK Supreme Court in For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers & relating EHRC-Guidelines

Letter to the British ambassador, Andrew Gill


08/05/2025

Your Excellency, The judgement of the UK Supreme Court in the case For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers has a devastating effect on the daily life of transgender and non-binary people, not just in the UK but anywhere in the western world like it has in Germany too. That´s why we‘re reaching out to you.

We are convinced that the court´s unanimous judgement is unanimously biased and that the judges sided with the appellants, regardless what transgender people had to say about it. They simply haven´t been heard. In a case like this that is not just unusual, it looks like basic procedures like those in any other supreme or constitutional court in the western world have been omitted. Though we are no experts in British judiciary, that can´t be right. The judgement itself does not create “clarity” as the British Government calls it. In our opinion, it contradicts the Gender Recognition Act (2004) and the legal framework that made it come to life: The judgements of the European Court of Human Rights, and the European Court of Justice. On the contrary, the Supreme Court gave no hint that EU case law had to be set aside. The UK are still a member of the European Council on Human Rights. Back in 1997 the European Court of Justice decided discrimination on grounds of being transgender is discrimination on grounds of “sex”.

That judgement is part of the Supreme Court´s opinion making but hasn´t been fully taken into account. Even worse, the UK´s Equality and Human Rights Commission vastly overstretched the Supreme Court´s judgement with its preliminary guidelines published recently.

In our opinion it´s a violation of Art.11 Human Rights Act (1998) to tell women-only, lesbian-only or gay-only and men-only associations who should become a member or not. EHRC is telling these associations they have no say in that. If an association like those deliberately doesn´t admit trans* people so be it, but we think it´s illegal to force them. The supposed “clarity” will probably lead to transgender men applying for membership in a women-only club let´s say a gym. A transgender man (“biological woman”) with a beard and a low voice there or a nice “female” looking trans* woman entering a men-only gym, forced into this situation by law, will clarify only the ignorance behind this legal action. Moreover, employers are now be forced to actively ask their employees whether they are trans* or not to avoid trespassing English law. Once a trans* person is known to the management, she will be forced to out herself as trans* every day, once she uses a bathroom.

This kind of “clarity” creates embarrassing and discriminating situations and contradicts provisions of the Equality Act regarding gender reassignment. First examples became apparent in May. For us, EHRC´s guidelines are a 21th century version of apartheid. EHRC is degrading itself to an institution promoting inequality on a path already laid out. We´d appreciate an answer from you to the following questions:

How exactly will the British Government ensure the dignity of transgender people in light of our arguments brought forward?

The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers will probably be contested at the European Court of Human Rights. Will the British Government accept a verdict from that court?

Does the British Government support or not support any change of how sex data are recorded, leading to passports and other documents showing the sex recorded at birth of transgender people rather than an updated gender marker?

mit freundlichen Grüßen

Jenny Wilken, dgti

8th May 1945 – The “liberation” of Germany

This week in working class history

80 years ago today, the Second World War ended in Europe (although it was to continue in Asia, including the barbaric boming of Hiroshima and Nagazaki). The war was, according to British historian Donny Gluckstein, two different wars – one waged from below against Fascism and one from above for territory.

The liberation of Auschwitz and other concentration camps made clear the need to defeat Fascism, but in post-war West Germany many Fascists stayed in power. 25 cabinet ministers, one president and one chancellor had been members of Nazi organizations. Nazi industrialists who had made profits from stealing Jewish property were allowed to keep their gains.

The end of the war also provoked a wave of resistance within the “winning” countries and their colonies. In the UK, workers who had been promised a Land Fit for Heroes demanded sweeping social change, including the formation of the National Health Service. These demands were conceded, because in the words of Tory MP Quintin Hogg “If you don’t give the people social reform, they will give you social revolution.”.

Across Africa and Asia, people who had been fighting against racism abroad now demanded their own liberation. Following a series of uprisings, in the 15 years following the end of the war, three dozen countries freed themselves from their former colonisers.

We Are All in the Gutter, But Some of Us Are Girlbossing the Stars

On Bezos, Blue Origin, and Katy Perry


07/05/2025

Two weeks ago, a friend sent me a video on TikTok that looked very much like an outtake from Greta Gerwig’s Barbie. A gaggle of women, clearly fresh from the hair and make-up department and wearing matching midnight blue spandex spacesuits à la iconic cartoon trio from Totally Spies, hopped onto a spaceship for a blink-and-you’ll miss it zoom into the galaxy. I only recognized Katy Perry, but some of her cohort seemed hazily familiar. I chuckled at the video, because I immediately assumed it was AI-generated. I was even reluctantly impressed: somebody had obviously presented AI with a ludicrous prompt and it had risen to the occasion splendidly. Hours later, I found myself back on TikTok, and realised in horror that this was an actual thing, that had actually happened, in actual real life. You have to hand it to Katy Perry, who as the most famous member of the bunch is receiving the most press. Every time she seems to take her most embarrassing misstep, she returns with an even fiercer flop. 

Since COVID, general feeling towards celebrities and the elite class has soured. You couldn’t really place the blame on an exact moment in time, but Gal Gadot and her assortment of celebrity mates crooning John Lennon’s Imagine a mere fortnight into lockdown always seemed to me significant domino in this line of disenchantment. (We were social distancing for two weeks, Gal. Why do you want us to imagine there’s no people?) The cannier of celebrities—or maybe their public relations teams—have caught onto this and seemed to conspire a pivot, striving to straddle a line between relatability and aspiration. Perry has never quite levelled up to her shrewd peers. But despite this, I was still blown away by her involvement in such a breath-taking misfire at empowerment and spirituality. I’m not surprised she and the women she took to the skies with are out of touch, but I am amazed that they didn’t have the sense to pretend not to be. 

The eleven-minute “mission” (trip? Jaunt? Expedition?) was an initiative of Blue Origin, a Jeff Bezos-founded company envisioning “a future where millions of people will live and work in space with a single-minded purpose: to restore and sustain Earth, our blue origin”. Bezos has made the dubious claim that the rocket had no carbon emissions, with a variety of experts promptly calling into question the likelihood of this. BBC News almost immediately explored and critiqued the green credentials touted by the billionaire. Despite his philanthropic initiatives, Bezos has been embroiled in a number of controversies, from toxic work environments to tax avoidance to drastically underreporting Amazon’s carbon emissions. As with many billionaires, there’s an altruistic surface and a sinister underbelly. But as ruthless as I imagine him to be, I wouldn’t have expected the concoction of such a ridiculous scheme from him. Unless, of course, it was planned to go viral due to cringe in the age-old spirit of “all press is good press”. If that’s what he wanted, he succeeded magnificently. 

Alongside Perry, the mission’s crew included journalist and Bezos’ fiance Lauren Sánchez, civil rights activist Amanda Nguyen, CBS Morning’s co-host Gayle King, film producer Kerianne Flynn, and former rocket scientist for NASA Aisha Bowe. Sánchez spearheaded the mission/trip/jaunt/expedition, and hand-selected her crew. “All of these women are storytellers in their own right. They’re going to go up to space and be able to spread what they felt in different ways,” Sánchez told ELLE Magazine before the flight took place. An ambitious order for eleven minutes. 

I don’t wish to disparage these women for their achievements. All of them have clearly excelled in their respective professions. I also don’t intend to undermine femininity or frivolity: I’m a big fan of glam, and the outfits and freshly blown-out hair were probably the best part of their venture to me. If you’re going into space, you may as well serve face. Considering the punishing lens women in the media are often under, I do try to approach stories like this with as much measure as possible. But I am fairly confident that, in a parallel universe where the mission/trip/jaunt/expedition took place with Justin Timberlake and Jimmy Fallon, it would go down with the public almost the same way. Of course, boasting that this was only the second all-female space flight since Valentina Tereshkova’s in 1963, Blue Origin attempted to employ a veneer of female empowerment, a veneer flimsier than Gal Gadot’s ability to read a room. 

Perhaps in 2014, when the Oscar selfie took the internet by storm, this may have been better-received. I doubt it. Even prior to the sullied feeling towards the rich and famous gaining traction, I struggle to imagine the most fledgling feminist finding the spaceflight to be empowering. And yet, they took to the skies seeming thoroughly convinced that the footage would inspire a frenzy of female admiration. Perhaps Perry thought by taking this step for us normies, she’d return to a planet much like that shown in the music video for her song Woman’s World, released last year. People were actually very ready to welcome the campy songstress with open arms and she was certainly primed for a comeback. Then she brought us a shallow, pseudo-liberating, clumsily executed, and melody-lacking flop produced by the same Dr Luke who Ke$ha had accused of sexual and emotional abuse. The album was duly universally panned. That’s partly why I was shocked she was on the flight; after the backlash, I’d imagined she, or a publicist, or her partner, or a friend, or a pet, or a bird in the trees would have raised concerns about the optics. 

The optics were this: reeking of performativity, the group boarded the ship like they were readying themselves to burst out of it en-masse once high enough, to then Kill Bill the harmful radiation affecting the ozone layer. Instead, they bobbed ineffectually inside, mugging at the cameras, wide-eyed, breathless, toting personal mementos. Look, I’m sure it was a humbling moment, peering down at the earth from so high above. I can understand their wonder. I just can’t fathom why they expected it to be inspirational. 

“Taking up space!” the group cheered, a mantra repeated when they returned to land eleven minutes later. Flinging themselves from the ship, they struck power poses and burst into noisy, extravagant tears. They saluted the sky and kissed the ground. It was clear the team of women had bought into the notion that the world would react with fervent applause. King, probably imagining the story to be profound, recalled afterwards how Perry burst into an acapella version of What a Wonderful World on their way down, finished by the singer dreamingly gazing at the landscape rushing towards them and remarking, “I haven’t sang that song in years”. 

A panel discussion was hosted afterwards, wrapped in a bubblegum-pink facade of superficial girly pop-feminism. I—and most others—was confused by the sanctimonious, self-satisfied discourse bestowed upon us viewers as if they were a pack of wise storybook owls. “We’re making space,” Perry said, with the honeyed, emotionally wrought, yet oddly vapid tones of a Yoga instructor at The White Lotus. “I hope [people] can see the unity that we modelled, and replicate that, and understand that we weren’t just taking up space, we were making space… for the future.” Lauren Sánchez underscored how the event made her feel, “connected. More connected than you realize”. They referred to each other as “celestial sisters”, bonded by this singular experience. 

As of yet, it’s still unclear what they modelled. They certainly took up space, in the literal and figurative fashion. Making space? Where? The average woman on the street is as likely to find themselves in the next Blue Origin ship as they are to sprout wings themselves. Female astronauts who have studied assiduously for years do not seem to have received anything of worth from what has boiled down to a catastrophic publicity stunt. Personally, the only thing I felt upon realising the footage was real (oh, how I wish it was AI) was mirth, mingled with disgust. The estimated cost of the mission/trip/jaunt/expedition is between $200,000 and $500,000, and a further estimated cost of $150,000 to reserve a seat. It’s difficult to ascertain whether the attendees paid this fee. Either way, it was an exquisite and unnerving show of wealth, wrapped up in a bow of platitudes and presented to a planetful of people facing climate catastrophe, tariff chaos, and social oppression. 

Valentina Tereshkova’s three-day stint in space in 1963 was, and still is, hailed as a landmark achievement and an inspiration for women worldwide. Tereshkova, a textile factory worker and amateur skydiver prior to joining the Soviet space program, orbited the Earth 48 times solo. That single trip logged more flight time than had been amassed by all American astronauts who preceded her. Dubbed an international role model following the feat, Tereshkova received masses of letters and telegrams from all corners of the world. Women in particular reacted with acclaim and excitement, as the event sparked a wave of think pieces, academic articles, and news stories celebrating the sense of visibility and symbolic progress it projected around the world. 61 years ago, Tereshkova’s journey achieved what Bezos and company wanted: she reached women of all ages, and she expanded the idea of the spheres in which women can take up space. 

Almost all coverage of the Blue Origin mission/trip/jaunt/expedition, from Loose Women to The New York Times, has noted that a billionaire-funded parade of women taking a brief joyride to the edge of space does little to advance real progress or meaningfully shift the needle for women’s equality. The people involved in the event—most of whom would claim to be liberal—have undoubtedly wreaked havoc on the climate already, and now they’ve indulged in another upper-crust experience completely inaccessible to us mere mortals. And absurdly, they expected us to be thrilled by it. I haven’t yet watched the latest season of Black Mirror, but despite its good reviews I wonder if Charlie Booker ought to hang up his hat. His dark reflection of our society keeps being outdone by the grotesque reality. I imagine Saturday Night Live will parody the space-excursion, but at the same time, how much further can they go? It’s already satire.

Disrupt Now

Bike tour: Agriculture in movement

At the end of 2023, when thousands of farmers took to the streets in Germany to protest against cuts to agricultural subsidies, increasing bureaucratisation and pressure from free trade agreements, the focus shifted to an issue that had long been in the background: food and agriculture.

For progressive left-wing movements, this was a moment for reconsideration: should they get involved in this discussion? But the positions of those involved were too different and the topic, which many had previously only known from the supermarket, seemed too complex.

In the background, however, it became clear that increasing deregulation and market exploitation, coupled with a policy based on the Green New Deal and at the same time propaganda from the right against sustainable agricultural changes, puts us in a dilemma. Issues such as food and agriculture seem almost irrelevant in the face of global crises, the rise of the right and the expansion of power by oligarchs such as Trump and Musk. But it is precisely in this situation that the question of a fair and sustainable food system is more urgent than ever.

The Disrupt. initiative is an alliance of anti-capitalist groups who are convinced that there can only be a good life for all beyond the logic of profit and exploitation. Instead of fighting the shift to the right in isolation and later focussing on other issues, Disrupt. sees food as a central element of capitalist crisis management.

The agricultural industry and EU agricultural policy are at the centre of the criticism. They not only promote the exploitation of people and resources, but also exacerbate social and ecological crises. We need a food revolution that puts people first, not profit. At Disrupt. we agree that the current agricultural policy and existing conservative and right-wing structures are a dead end. They support a system of overcrowded animal factories, depleted soils, poisoned water and poor wages. At the expense of the environment, justice and the future.

Bike tour with many questions

But what could a “food revolution” and a sustainable and fair food system look like in concrete terms?

From 7 to 23 May, 2025 we will cycle 1,000 km across Germany. We want to learn, network and find answers. We will visit places of destruction of today and sustainable projects of tomorrow. The tour ends at the “Wesercamp’ in Brake near Bremen, where people are fighting against the expansion of a huge feed import harbour that imports mainly soya from Brazil – another example of the destructive logic of industrial agriculture.

Taking part

On 9 May, the bike tour will be in Berlin. With a project visit to Weltacker e.V., a rally in front of the BMEL and a panel discussion on “Farming Today & Utopias of Tomorrow.”

Information on the route & programme here:

What’s next

The bike tour is just the beginning: ahead of the climate conference in Brazil, we are organising days of action near Bremen from 7 to 13 October as part of an alliance of groups worldwide! We are protesting against global supply chains that exploit people and nature here and worldwide and invite you to join us as we resolutely oppose the agricultural system.

Contact us on social media

News from Berlin and Germany, 06th May 2025

Weekly new round-up for Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

22,000 take to the streets for the 1st of May

The May Day protests in Berlin were more peaceful than in previous years. According to the police, 22,000 people took part in the “Revolutionary May 1st Demo,” but there were relatively few arrests and injuries. The police claim that this is the merit of their new de-escalation tactics, and received the praise of Berlin’s Minister for the Interior, Iris Spranger (SPD). The revolutionary demo was just one of many, after the previous day’s “Take Back the Night” queer-feminist protest, the DGB union protest, and the satirical “Milei, Musk and Merz to Mars” demo in Grunewald. Source: tagesspiegel

Berlin’s Senator for Culture Joe Chialo resigns

Joe Chialo (CDU) resigned after being Berlin’s Senator for Culture and Social Cohesion in Kai Wegner’s Senate since 2023. Speculation as to whether he would become Federal Minister of State for Culture, came to an end once the CDU officially announced that media entrepreneur Wolfram Weimer would take over that post. Chialo’s time in office was not without controversy, such as the conflict surrounding the “antisemitism clause” proposed after the Hamas attack on Israel. He was also sharply criticised for the Berlin Senate’s austerity measures, which have had a massive impact on the cultural sector. Source: bz

Sarah Wedl-Wilson becomes Berlin’s new Senator for Culture

Sarah Wedl-Wilson will take Joe Chialo’s place as the Senator of Culture in the capital. Berlin’s mayor, Kai Wegner (CDU), claimed that Wedl-Wilson understands the problems and enjoys the trust of cultural workers. Unlike her predecessor, Wedl-Wilson is not a member of the CDU party. Born in Great Britain in 1969, the long-time cultural manager not only has experience in cultural administration but is also considered a long-standing expert on Berlin’s cultural scene. During the announcement, when asked about the budget cuts, she just stated that “Berlin will remain a cultural metropolis.” Source: rbb

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Islamophobic MP becomes State Secretary

Christoph de Vries (CDU) has spent years dealing with migration and made a nationwide name for himself with racist statements. The Hamburg politician is now to become State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of the Interior. He announced he wants to “do everything in his power to make the asylum turnaround a reality.” The fact that de Vries is promoted outraged the Hamburg Alliance Against the Right (HBgR), among other organisations. “The CDU man represents AfD positions,” according to HBgR spokesperson Felix Krebs. At a panel discussion in 2021, de Vries presented an “integration scale,” where he ranked foreigner groups from starting downwards from those who share “the same level as the organic Germans.” Source: taz

Gérard Depardieu concert on Rügen cancelled

The French actor Gérard Depardieu had planned to perform at the Putbus theatre on the island of Rügen last Friday. However, the event was cancelled at short notice. According to the theatre, he is not allowed to leave France, where he is currently on trial for sexual assault. The director of the Putbus theatre, Peter Gestwa, affirmed that they only found out about the travel ban on Thursday afternoon. “It came as a surprise that the public prosecutor’s office turned up and wanted his passports,” he added. The event was sold out. Source: bz

The pension system and the coalition agreement

There are two aspects in the coalition agreement that might be politically and economically explosive. Firstly, the coalition could be planning to oblige the self-employed to join the statutory pension scheme, which could be a major advance – or a drop in the ocean. The major drawback of statutory pension insurance for the self-employed is that they pay their contributions alone, i.e. there is no employer who pays half of the contributions. Secondly, the pension level could be abolished as an assessment parameter, without a clear alternative outlined in the document. A major pension reform is still not in sight. Source: focus

Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution classifies AfD as right-wing extremist

The AfD has now been classified as confirmed right-wing extremist throughout Germany by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. This previously only applied to three state associations: Thuringia, Saxony, and Saxony-Anhalt. Nationwide, the AfD has been listed as a suspected right-wing extremist case since March 2021. This authorized the domestic intelligence agency to use resources such as informants, surveillance, and the analysis of public and non-public sources. The AfD itself considers the decision to be politically motivated. As Deputy Chairman Stephan Brandner told the Rheinische Post, such a decision has a damaging meaning on the image of the party. Source: dw

“AfD politicians have no place at concentration camp commemorations”

Germany is currently commemorating the end of WWII and the liberation of the concentration camps 80 years ago. Brandenburg’s memorial director, Prof. Dr. Axel Drecoll, warned of the rise of right-wing extremists at the former Sachsenhausen concentration camp. “The AfD trivializes the crimes of the National Socialists,” he said. “For them, the end of the Nazi regime is not a liberation.” Drecoll argues that coming to terms with the Nazi era and protecting fundamental rights are intertwined: “Today, we have a responsibility to defend this foundation by all means.” Source: bz

Merz elected Chancellor on second attempt

CDU leader Friedrich Merz has been elected Chancellor on his second attempt. The 69-year-old achieved the needed majority of more than 316 votes in the Bundestag. 325 members voted for him, 289 against, and one abstained. The new governing coalition of the CDU/CSU and SPD has 328 votes in parliament. Among the first to congratulate Merz was outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD). Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier subsequently received Merz at the Bellevue Palace and presented him with his certificate of appointment. This morning, Merz had fallen short of the required majority in the first round of voting – a unique event in the history of the Federal Republic. Source: tagesschau