The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

 “Eurovision is about getting very impassioned about something that does not matter”

Interview with Ciarán Dold from Corner Späti and Gyrovision


14/05/2025

Hi Ciarán, thanks for talking to us. Can you start by just briefly introducing yourself?

I’m a comedian and researcher and probably better known as a podcaster with Corner Späti. We attempt to cover European politics from a left-wing and less serious perspective. We’ve been doing this for about 6 years now.

And now for the fifth time, you’ll be doing Gyrovision. Let’s start with the question I keep hearing, and will not work in a printed interview. How do you pronounce Gyrovision?

That is debated. One of Corner Späti’s co-hosts is Greek, and he gives out to me about pronouncing gyrovision with that hard English “G.” He’s informed me that it is actually pronounced “Eurovision.”

But I like calling it “geero-vision.” So, the official pronunciation of Gyrovision is with a hard G.

And what is Gyrovision?

When we started Corner Späti, we had a focus on Europe. And I’ve always felt that the unifying aspect of “European culture”––with heavy quotation marks––is actually Eurovision.

A lot of people on the right will say that it’s Philosophy and Christendom and Architecture and all that very dodgy stuff, when, in reality, I still think it’s Eurodance, and Cascada, and teenage binge drinking in front of your local rinky dink funfair. And Eurovision, I think, represents that quite well. I wanted to show my co-hosts Eurovision through my eyes.

We had to wait a year, because when we started the podcast in 2019, and BDS had called a boycott because Israel was hosting. And as much as I love Eurovision, it’s not more important than solidarity with the Palestinian people. The following year was the pandemic year, and we had to cancel last-minute.

Finally, in 2021, we started doing our own commentary on the Eurovision. That’s how Gyrovision started. We always made this joke that Gyro was the substitute word for a cheap knockoff version. I think the joke started originally as GyroDisney instead of EuroDisney, but then expanded to this.

Then last year, we did a boycott-friendly version. We try to make something as close to Eurovision as possible, without giving the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) any money or attention.

Before we talk about the boycott, there is a difference between Gyrovision and other comedic coverage of Eurovision in that you actually enjoy this shit. What is it about Eurovision that you like?

Part of it is definitely that I am Irish, and we have a, er, relationship with Eurovision. Ireland is currently, although probably not for long, joint first place with Sweden in most of the Eurovision wins of.

I have very nostalgic childhood memories of people in my street getting together to watch Eurovision. In Ireland, it would always be the first sunny day of the year. People would have barbecues in the garden, and then you’d go inside to watch the telly and see this contest happening.

People usually say it’s rubbish, but end up watching it regardless. It’s one of the most-watched live events in the world, more watched than the Super Bowl. Yet no one likes talking about it, which I find fascinating.

It scratches all the itches of music, pageantry, geography, and a fair amount of politics, even though they try to deny that’s there.

And yet most of the coverage talks less about the songs and more about who votes for whom and who doesn’t vote for whom.

People will say: “oh, Greece and Cyprus always vote for each other, it must be corruption.” And yeah, corruption has happened, especially with Azerbaijan, but it’s more because there’s a lot of Cypriots in Greece, and there’s a lot of Greek people in Cyprus who watch it at home.

You can also explain that with the UK and Ireland. The UK often gives points to Ireland, but Ireland doesn’t give points to the UK. People say “that must be the history,” but it’s more that there’s probably just more Irish people in the UK than there are British people in Ireland.

For a lot of countries, it’s very high stakes. This is the only international representation they have. A lot of countries like, famously Moldova, are not successful at sports. They take Eurovision very, very seriously, because it’s the only time Moldova is really represented on an international stage.

This means that they often have an outsized performance at the competition. I would describe Moldova’s characteristic at Eurovision as being drunk at the opening scene of a Wes Anderson movie. That’s the vibe their music usually gives. And it’s a lot of fun.

Every year, there’s always been some low level calls to boycott Eurovision because it features Israel. And these calls have been largely irrelevant. Last year, it was different. How did Gyrovision deal with the genocide?

A lot of these calls fall on deaf ears, because Eurovision has a very intense casual viewership. People usually just watch. Most people who watch Eurovision are watching it because there’s nothing else on telly that night.

There are super fans, but most people are very casually engaged, including the people who call for boycotts, who usually call for a boycott way too late. I usually see calls for kicking Israel out in March or April. But Eurovision 2025 was set in stone in September 2024. It’s a very slow moving and bureaucratic process.

The usual rule for BDS is they’ll only call for a boycott when Israel hosts Eurovision. As far as I understand, there isn’t an official boycott this year, probably because BDS is asking a lot of people right now or they think they are.

Last year, I knew a boycott was coming for obvious reasons. We listened to people saying what they wanted to do, and we said, “Fuck it. We can do this without the EBU getting any money”. We were able to get the songs in a way where EBU doesn’t get any money and we did the Eurovision ourselves. People voted. Obviously, we don’t include Israel and Azerbaijan for their various war crimes.

What are your criteria for who you don’t include? You exclude Israel and Azerbaijan. But you let people vote for Britain who are responsible for their fair share of war crimes. 

Israel and Azerbaijan have used Eurovision for soft power reasons. Last year, the Israeli president intervened to make sure that Israel went to the competition. They take this stuff very seriously.

I think people recognize that for all the crimes the various other countries commit, I don’t think they would care all that much if they weren’t in Eurovision anymore, but Israel really seems to care.

This is probably the only thing where Israel is really relevant on the international stage. It’s the only thing where they’re represented as a country. They’re not big World Cup players. I never hear anyone talk about Israel in the Olympics, because it’s usually just America and China getting all the medals.

Irish-South African professor Patrick Bond makes pretty much the same argument, saying that the sports boycott was really important for South Africa, but if you want to hit Israel you’ve got to hit Eurovision.

Yeah. And unfortunately, I see that cynically deployed by Eurovision super fans who feel a little bit guilty, but they still want to watch the Eurovision. They say that no-one’s calling for a FIFA boycott of Israeli clubs.

But this is not relevant. You have to direct your energy somewhere. And unfortunately, Eurovision is the place. All this can also be said for Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is also not very relevant in various sports, but they are relevant in Eurovision.

Plus there is a call for a FIFA boycott, even if it won’t hit Israel as much. Coming back to the way in which Israel tries to weaponize Eurovision: can you say something about last year’s and this year’s Israeli entries?

Last year’s entry was Eden Golan. It was less about the artist and more about the song itself. The song was originally titled October Rain, and as soon as that title was leaked, everyone on Eurovision fan media was saying: “Oh, fuck no. We know exactly what this is”.

I believe that they were initially trying to provoke the European Broadcasting Union into kicking them out, like they had done with Belarus. Then, when it looked like Iceland was about to send a Palestinian musician, Israeli President Herzog went to the national broadcaster Kan and said, “Change the lyrics.” That’s how we got the song Hurricane. When it was performed, it was booed live at the arena.

Now, I boycotted last year. That was a very easy decision for me. I’ve had these politics around Israeli Apartheid for a very long time. But I also heard a lot of reports of people going to Eurovision 2024, saying: “Music is music. Let’s leave politics out of it”, then leaving the competition saying: “Oh God, fuck Israel.”

So it served as a weird, radicalizing event for a lot of people. There was also a lot of shenanigans backstage, which goes into a whole other set of drama.

This year there’s Yuval Raphael. She was at the Nova music festival on October 7th 2023. She is considered a survivor. Her song is called A New Day Will Dawn. And they’re very much trying this year to once more redirect the conversation onto Israeli victims of this conflict at the expense of Palestinian victims, of whom there are many more

That’s how the song is being instrumentalized this year. Both are trying to elicit sympathy from a European audience, which, from what I’ve seen, is failing. But unfortunately, institutions are just putting up with Israel’s presence in this competition.

But there is more of a vocal call for boycott, for example from over 150 former Eurovision contestants including an Irish winner. Do you get a sense that something is changing?

Unfortunately, I don’t think anything has changed. Last year, the comparison that was often made was that Russia was kicked out after their invasion of Ukraine. But the EBU only banned Russia after ten national broadcasters in Eastern Europe, Central Europe, and I believe the Netherlands, threatened to pull out of the competition unless Russia was kicked out. It got a lot of institutional support.

Kicking Israel out has had a lot of support from fans, casual viewers, musicians, and people who are just staff at these events. Also songwriters, but who remembers the songwriters? Unfortunately, there’s still not enough institutional support.

If anything is changing, the unsung hero leading the charge is actually the Slovenian national broadcaster. They’re being the most vocal about this, and dragging in other countries like Spain, Norway, and Ireland.

The Slovenian national broadcaster started asking: “Why is Israel here? Can we talk about that? It doesn’t feel right.” The national broadcaster in Israel has broken a lot of EBU rules, and for this reason alone, they should be kicked out, regardless of any moral conversation about Palestine. They have been given a green light on a bunch of other rules that they’ve broken, such as independence from government propaganda, or promoting military things.

Do you have any tips for Eurovision? I know you’re very fond of the Australian entry.

This year I’m enjoying how horny the Australian entry is. I love how explicit you have to be when you do innuendo in a Eurovision Song. You understand that most of the audience don’t speak English as a first language, so you are very direct.

In Eurovision, these are 20 something songs that you will never listen to in your spare time. They do not reflect your actual music taste, but you are going to pick your favorite song from the bunch, and then you are going to start yelling at everyone who disagrees with you. It’s about getting very impassioned about something that does not matter and shouldn’t matter and should just be a bit of silly television.

How can people listen to songs and still observe the boycott?

There are two ways to do this. One, unfortunately, is Spotify. You can listen to all the songs in Eurovision this year but the money goes to the artists’ record label. And when we say money, we mean a fraction of a cent. We know how Spotify works. But that money does not go to the EBU.

The second way would be to use an online platform called Invidious, which is a no-tracking mirror of YouTube. None of the advertising revenue is counted by YouTube, because it hasn’t tracked you.

Let’s move on to Gyrovision. What will happen at Gyrovision and why should people go?

I and other hosts of Corner Späti will be doing commentary over the songs. We make our own opening ceremony. We make our own postcards, which is Eurovision terminology for the little bit that happens before the song plays showcasing the country.

We do all this to show you Europe through our somewhat sardonic lens. We do the usual stuff like dressing up, drinking, and dancing, all in the name of donating money to the Palestinian charities Heal Palestine and The Ghassan Abu Sittah Children’s Fund.

It’s for people who don’t take Eurovision very seriously. As much as I am a fan, I learn about it so that I can just kind of joke along with it in a knowing manner. It should be a lot of fun.

And this year, Gyrovision isn’t on the day of Eurovision, it’s the day after. 

Yes, this year it is on the Sunday, because since we’re boycotting it doesn’t actually matter when we host it. It’s from 6pm till 10pm at Lark Berlin. Because it’s on Sunday, we are ending a little earlier.

You can come along and vote for your own songs, just like a real Eurovision, and we’ve got someone who’s made a little app for us to tally the votes.

Because it’s on the Sunday, people can also come to Palivision on Saturday, and we’re not competing like last year.

Absolutely, the feud that happened last year, we were just circling each other, staring daggers.

Is there anything else you want to say that we haven’t said,

Just that I am a fan of the Eurovision Song Contest, and I represent the type of person who could watch Eurovision again if the European Broadcasting Union actually kicked out Israel. I am the market they are missing out on.

I hear a lot of people talk about Eurovision from a perspective of “I never watched anyway”. I don’t think that’s the kind of voices that the EBU needs to hear. They need to hear from more people like me who say: I would watch, but you fucked up, so fix it.

Zeit zu reden

Series of talks on political aspects of the Israel-Palestine conflict which demand constructive discussion

Zeit zu reden is a series of discussions on political topics that emerged in response to a public debate that, since October 7, 2023, has been marked by a lack of openness, fear, misinformation, and, at times, defamation and hate speech—whether in politics, the media, or on the streets.

Given a debate culture increasingly shaped by populism and hostility, the goal is to foster knowledge-sharing and nuanced discussions. Sensitive and emotionally charged topics are examined from all angles, but always within a human rights framework.

Despite differing viewpoints, participants share a commitment to the rule of law, democracy, and open dialogue. Zeit zu reden brings together scholars, intellectuals, and experts from diverse backgrounds for in-depth discussions on issues that are difficult to address in the German public sphere. Their expertise helps broaden and deepen the debate, challenging entrenched perspectives while encouraging recognition of alternative viewpoints.

This May marks 80 years since the end of the Second World War. Our focus this month is on Memory Culture, with two upcoming events that explore its meaning and impact today.

  • May 16 – Zeit zu reden Memory Culture (1): Gaza and German Memory Politics in a Global Context
    with Mishra Pankaj & Daniel Marwecki
  • May 23 – Zeit zu reden Memory Culture (2): What does “Never again is now” mean? featuring Wolfgang Benz, Asal Dardan, Sarah El Bulbeisi & Gerhard Hanloser

Both events are moderated by Kristin Helberg

Location: Hermannstraße 86, 12051 Berlin-Neukölln
Time: 19:00 – 22:00
No registration required—just come early to secure your spot!

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

News from Berlin and Germany, 14th May 2025

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

“Berlin4”: court halts all deportations

The state of Berlin has suffered another set back in the dispute over the intended deportation of four activists accused of criminal offences following their participation in pro-Palestinian protests at Freie Universität in October 2024. In the case of the so-called “Berlin4”, the Berlin Administrative Court has ruled in favour of those affected in the last two cases last Monday. They are from the USA and from Poland. On 10 April and 6 May, the court upheld the appeals of a man and a woman with Irish citizenship in initial summary proceedings. Source: nd-aktuell

No weapons production in Wedding

The armaments group Rheinmetall is one of the winners of the war. With the military turnaround, the value of the company’s shares has multiplied. Now Rheinmetall is reorganising production at several sites in Germany: where previously civilian goods were produced, armaments are to be manufactured in future. This includes the subsidiary Pierburg in the Berlin district of Wedding. But resistance is mounting. On Saturday, around 1,500 anti-militarists demonstrated under the slogan “No Rheinmetall in Wedding” to demand that money be spent on social issues instead of armaments. The protest was organised by the Wedding grassroots group of the Left Party as well as numerous communist and socialist groups. Source: nd-aktuell

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Germany spends one in four euros on housing costs

People in Germany spend on average one in four euros on housing, according to figures from the European statistics authority “Eurostat”, which the Federal Statistical Office had analysed in response to an enquiry from the BSW. According to the data, individuals and families spent 24.5% oftheir income on rent or other housing costs, such as home ownership, in 2024. People at risk of poverty in Germany even spent an average of 43.8% of theirincome on housing, i.e. almost every second euro. This is 5.3% higher than the EU average. Source: Zeit

Right-wing violence: “The disinhibition is clearly noticeable”

In 2024, the counselling centres Opferberatung Rheinland (OBR) and BackUp from Dortmund set an unfortunate new record: 526 cases of right-wing, racist, antisemitic or other misanthropic violence were documented – an increase of around 48% compared to the previousyear. At least 728 people were directly affected. Eight people died because of attacks last year. “Homicides are an expression of maximum escalation – they make it clear that right wing violence in NRW is life-threatening,” says Sabrina Hosono from the OBR. Fabian Reeker, also from the OBR, speaks of an “alarming peak in right-wing violence” in North Rhine-Westphalia. Source: ad-aktuell

Demonstrators in several cities call for AfD ban

Demonstrations against right-wing extremism and in favour of an AfD ban took place in more than 60 German cities on Sunday – including Berlin and in Brandenburg. The demonstrations were organised by the “Together against the right” network and the “Defend human dignity – ban the AfD now” initiative. In the nation wide announcement, the organisers called on the federal government to initiate proceedings to ban the AfD. The central rally in Berlin began at 4 pm at the Brandenburg Gate. According to the police, around 4,000 people took part. The organisers spoke of around 7,500 demonstrators. Source: rbb

Antisemitism dispute in the Left flares up again

At a party conference in Halle, on 9 and 10 May, “Die Linke” declared its solidarity with the Palestinians, demanded the release of the Israeli hostages and condemned Hamas terrorism as well as “every act of war by the Israeli army that violates international law”. Antisemitism was also discussed, with criticisms how accusations of antisemitism are instrumentalised by politicians and institutions to silence people who denounce Israeli war crimes. Most of the party conference had opposed the misuse of anti-Semitism of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), not against to its definition. Source: nd-aktuell

Be human!

Margot Friedländer died on Friday 9 May at the age of 103 in the city of her birth. On the day of her death, she should have received the Grand Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany. She had been showered with honours and awards in recent years. Margot Friedländer suffered the torments of Nazism and fought for humanity, with the call: “Be human!” For today, this also means: ban the AfD! And all other right-wing extremist movements and groups that are once again coming to the surface in Germany. And a humane migration policy. Source: nd-aktuell

Non-Germans should have voting rights after 5 years’ residence, says “die Linke”

The co-leader of the Left Party (“die Linke”) Jan van Aken, has proposed a six-point plan to strengthen the country’s democratic system: 1) Introducing referendums (Volksentscheide) at the federal level; 2) Bringing the national voting age down to 16 years old; 3) Enfranchising international residents who have been living in Germany for at least 5 years; 4) Establishing citizens’ councils at the state and federal level; 5) Capping single, private donations to political parties at 10,000 euros; and 6) Expanding residents’ voting rights on specific economic matters. The last point would expand all residents’ voting rights on specific economic issues, such as when a company were planning location closures. Source: iamexpat

Police file reveals new details about Mengele

Reporters from MDR (Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk) have tracked down a police file on Nazi criminal Josef Mengele that was previously thought to be missing. The documents, which apparently come from the archives of the Argentinian Federal Police, contain explosive information about Mengele’s whereabouts after the Second World War. The documents show that Mengele wanted to enter the Federal Republic of Germany in February 1959. The file contains a corresponding application to the Argentinian authorities using his real name, which was not previously documented. The renowned contemporary historian and Nazi researcher Bogdan Musial has examined copies of the file indetail and considers them to be authentic. Source: tagesschau

Let’s organize. Let’s resist.

The Left Berlin Speech at the Demo Against German Militarism (10th May 2025)


13/05/2025

Dear Comrades, Berliners of every background and fellow resisters —

We gather today in Berlin — not just any city, but a city built on the ruins of war.

From the devastation of World War II to the walls that divided its people, Berlin is a living memory of what militarism does.

And yet — here we are again.

Rheinmetall, Germany’s largest weapons manufacturer, has announced plans to convert its plant in Humboldthain — right here in the Wedding neighborhood — into a military production site.

What used to make car parts will now produce components for tanks and armored vehicles — tools of war, machines of death.

Let’s be clear: this is not just one factory.

This is part of the largest rearmament campaign in Germany since the Second World War.

More than €100 billion will be funneled into the military by 2028.

And it’s happening fast — in budgets, in public discourse, in laws, in political decisions and in the propaganda of the media.

And we must remember what German militarism has meant in history.

It meant colonial massacres in Namibia and Tanzania.

It meant two World Wars, genocide, and entire cities turned to ash.

It meant tanks rolling into Poland, Yugoslavia, Russia, North Africa — death in the name of empire and order.

And currently it means fuelling and supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

With German military equipment!

With our tax money!

We have learned this lesson once. We will not let it be forgotten.

Right now, the media and political class are busy selling us a new fear:

“Russia might invade Germany.”

“We must be ready for war.”

Let’s be clear: This is pure propaganda and warmongering. 

There is no scenario in which Russia — exhausted by its war in Ukraine, economically isolated, diplomatically weak — invades Germany, a central NATO state surrounded by U.S. military bases, nuclear weapons, and the most powerful alliance in the world.

But this fantasy of invasion is useful.

It justifies skyrocketing military budgets.

It justifies arms exports.

It justifies expanding the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) reach from Eastern Europe to the Indo-Pacific.

It keeps the weapons factories full, and the public scared.

This isn’t about defending democracy.

This is about defending Western imperial dominance — U.S. power, NATO control, and profits for arms manufacturers like Rheinmetall and Lockheed Martin.

And who pays the price?

Not the politicians.

Not their children.

It is all of us!

It is our youth who will be sent to die in wars they didn’t start and never chose.

It is the working class, the migrants, the poor, the racialized — who are always told to fight while elites get rich.

It is the population of Ukraine and Poland, always caught in between the imperial power game.

We will not let our populations be used as pawns in their wars and geopolitical aims.

Our responsibility as people of any citizenship status in Berlin is NOT to blindly obey political decisions such as the current militarization just to “integrate” to German society or avoid “standing out”.

Our responsibility is to stay informed, think critically, take action against the processes that lead to war and destruction. And to remind Germany of its criminal military past.

We say no to NATO. No to brainwashing. No to war. No to militarization.

Today, Rheinmetall profits while people fleeing war — from Afghanistan, from Sudan, from Palestine, from Syria — are met with walls, prisons, and silence.

Refugees are criminalized. Deportations intensify.

But it doesn’t have to be this way.

With that money, we could:

Build a Berlin of welcome — and we mean for all, not just for white Europeans.

But that future will not be handed to us.

It must be fought for.

Because militarization is not waiting.

It is moving quickly — into schools, into law, into policy, into culture.

And the longer we stay silent, the louder the war drums get.

So we must act. And we must act now.

We — the people of this city —

Germans and internationals.

Workers, renters, students, refugees.

We have a responsibility in this historic moment.

To stand up.

To speak out.

To organize from the ground up — in our neighborhoods, our classrooms, our cafés, our mosques, churches, synagogues, our unions and workplaces.

We must expose Rheinmetall.

Pressure the politicians.

Interrupt the war economy with people power.

And make one thing clear:

Berlin will not build war machinery.

Berlin will not fund genocide.

Not in our name.

Not in Wedding.

Not in Berlin.

Berlin is not a weapons hub.

Berlin is a city of memory and solidarity. This is our city! And we will not be silent!

Let’s organize. Let’s resist.

Thank you. Danke. Shukran. Teşekkür ederim. Gracias.

Solidarity forever.

On Gaza and Our Allegiance to the Human Family

A Palestinian poet on the importance of centering humanity during a genocide


12/05/2025

There are moments in history when silence becomes not only a failure, but a form of violence. We are living in one of those moments now.

For more than a year and a half, we have watched a people systematically dispossessed, starved, bombed, and buried beneath rubble. And much of the world watches in cold complicity—or worse, justifies it.

As a poet of Palestinian descent, I do not speak as a partisan. I speak as a human being, and as someone who believes, stubbornly, that truth matters and words carry weight. Bearing witness remains a moral act, especially when facts themselves are under assault.

What is happening in Gaza is not a mystery. It is not complicated. It is horror playing out in plain sight. Tens of thousands of children have been murdered. Hospitals shelled. Aid convoys turned away. Every safeguard of international law has been shredded. What name shall we give to this, if not genocide? In one of my recent poems, I put it this way:

‘‘If you’re uncomfortable saying Genocide, say mass murder… say boneyard… say unmarked graves…say pity the children… say humanity under the rubble…say Lord, forgive us the enormity of our sins.’’

In another poem from my book, Palestine Wail, I say that even “a quiet moan or sighing is preferable to false words or worse: a loud and wounding silence.”

And yet, in the face of these crimes, too many equivocate—pleading for “balance” as if this were a mere dispute. But neutrality in the face of brutality is betrayal. It flatters the aggressor and abandons the victim.

We must be clear: to condemn Israel’s actions is not to deny the suffering or humanity of Jews. On the contrary, it is to insist that no people’s trauma can ever justify the trauma of another. To grieve for Palestine is not hatred. It is conscience.

The poet Mohammed El-Kurd writes of the impossible expectations Palestinians face; that they be graceful in their dispossession, polite in their pain, saintly in their resistance. In Perfect Victims, he exposes the cruelty beneath these demands—and the dehumanization they conceal. I echo him here: the oppressed should not have to earn their dignity. It is theirs by birthright.

In my own Wail, I did not write to explain Palestinian suffering to the West. I wrote to honor its sacred witness. Art, I believe, can still humanize what has been rendered faceless. It can say, I see you. You are not forgotten.

Poetry, at its finest, is a flame. It burns through euphemism. It refuses polite erasure. It speaks the realities others dare not name.

Israel’s assault on Gaza is not self-defense. It is a campaign of erasure. And the United States, through its unflinching support, is deeply complicit. Billions in military aid. No red lines. No accountability.

And so I write. Because I must. Because silence would betray my heritage, my humanity, and whatever remains of my faith in words.

The time for hedging is over. Let us mourn without apology. Let us reject the false terms of debate. Let us ask the only question that matters now: what does it mean to be human in a time like this?

Enough is too much. Palestinians do not need our pity. They need our solidarity—desperately, and now.