The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

The Bolivian Left in Berlin

Movimiento Wiphala Alemania on the 2019 coup, indigenous resistance and building solidarity for Bolivian activists in Germany


24/01/2021

Translation by Ian Perry

 

How did the Wiphala group in Berlin come about, and what do you do?

The group’s members are Bolivians living in Berlin. It came about to unify the migrant community after the November 2019 coup in Bolivia. Our objective is to organise a united front, in order to:

  • Denounce the oppression that took place after the coup.
  • Demand the emancipation of the indigenous nations, whose resistance is based around the Wiphala, the indigenous symbol which was trampled on by the fascists.
  • Inform the German people and friends of Bolivia about the Wiphala through educational workshops.
  • Provide information regarding the injustices, abuses of power, violations of human rights, racism and media repression which our country was suffering.

Specifically, what has the Bolivian group been doing in Berlin and how do you support each other?

Our objective was to make ourselves visible, especially in Bolivia, using online videos to support the struggles of our compatriots in the cities and the countryside, through:

  • Demonstrations in front of the embassy and in symbolic settings, and cacerolazos (protest actions beating pots and pans).
  • Solidarity actions, such as holding cooking events to raise funds for the victims of the massacre of Senkata. We also collected money for the “Hunger is not a crime” programme for the poor of the city of El Alto during the Covid-19 lockdown.
  • Working collectively with other organisations in Europe though online platforms such as Twitter and Facebook (“Wiphalas across the World”). We held successful education sessions discussing important political themes, with the participation of social movement leaders, and Deputies and Senators of the Movement for Socialism (MAS). Such sessions went viral on social networks.
  • Building parallel struggles in different European countries, following the same forms of organisation and action across the continent.

In your experience what do Germans and others living in Berlin know about MAS, Evo Morales and the situation in Bolivia?
The information Germans have greatly depends on whether they have been to Bolivia. If they have visited as tourists, the great majority will know of Evo Morales as president. Those who have lived or live now in Bolivia also know that Morales was the first indigenous president, that he is a leader who arose from the social movements and that together with the Movement for Socialism (MAS), the political party which he represents, he had a major political impact over the last 14 years. As these years saw stability and growth in Bolivia this has created a generally positive image.

How would you describe the coup and the recent election in Bolivia to non-Bolivians living in Berlin?
Presidential elections were held on 20th October 2019. After a preliminary announcement of a MAS victory, the opposition groups, supported by the Organisation of American States (OEA) and its president Luis Almagro, claimed electoral fraud and rejected the results, calling on the population to revolt. This resulted in days of high tension and chaos in the country; electoral and state institutions, MAS campaign offices and the houses of MAS activists were attacked and burned down, and MAS political leaders kidnapped. This political and social persecution showed that a coup had taken place (months later a study of the election results by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Election Data and Science Lab found no evidence of fraud).

On 10th November Evo Morales, together with state vice-president Álvaro García Linera, resigned his position while denouncing the coup, in order to stop the continuing violence in the country.

The second vice-president of the Senate, Jeanine Añez Chávez, announced that under the constitution she was entitled to assume the state presidency. The conservative sectors behind the break with democracy presented Áñez’s accession to power as a straightforward constitutional succession, and their mass media supporters omitted all reference to the context in which Morales and other MAS state office holders were forced to resign. This façade was presented to the international community, with the USA among the first to recognise the de facto government, followed by the European Union and the German Foreign Ministry.

The de facto government, wanting to silence the population, ordered the armed forces to stop the protests, and issued a decree that the military could not be prosecuted if they killed anyone. This led to the massacres in Sacaba (in Cochabamba) and Senkata (in El Alto, by La Paz). 37 people died, more than 800 were injured, more than 1500 arrested and tortured, and dozens disappeared, plunging the Bolivian people into grief. The killings stopped after protests from international human rights organisations.

The de facto government started to crack under its own weight after a few months, since all the participants in the coup which had criminally taken over the state institutions and enterprises were immediately embroiled in corruption scandals. This started with corruption in the acquiring of medical supplies to confront the Covid-19 pandemic, and ended with the flight of directors of state enterprises, with suitcases full of money, to the United States.

Añez had said on taking power that her objective was to call new elections after 3 months, but this did not happen. Instead the date for new elections was postponed on more than 3 occasions in the course of 2020, provoking a social and political crisis, with the de facto government using the excuse that the conditions were not right. After months of patience the social, indigenous and trade union movements, coordinated though the Pact of Unity, became the main force which forced the October 18th 2020 date for the new elections and drove the reestablishment of democracy in Bolivia.

Añez put herself forward as a candidate for the presidency in the elections, which increased the divisions within the conservative bloc. In the run up to the elections the political parties (the majority of them right wing) attempted to create an alliance that could beat MAS at the polls. They made no effort to investigate those behind the massacres and persecutions that had followed the coup.

On 18th October the elections saw a huge turnout in a calm atmosphere. The results gave a massive MAS victory, with MAS candidate Luis Arce winning the Presidency and MAS gaining a majority in both chambers of the legislative assembly.

I’ve read a lot of very critical portrayals of Morales in the liberal US and European media over the past few years. How does it feel to see those as a Bolivian living abroad?

Many people who previously supported Morales and MAS became disenchanted over mistakes which damaged the image of the party over the course of the years. And the rich families who were used to running the country became sick with fear of losing their power and privilege, leading them to use violence to sow chaos in the country.

The mass media in the USA and Europe are enemies of the peoples’ struggles in Latin America, and they used their hegemonic position to promote lies about the reality in Bolivia, demonising Morales as a leftist follower of Castro and Chavez, and contributing to the destabilisation of the continent.

In spite of this, the progress that was made in the last decade is recognised across the world. The mass media’s ideas are now challenged via the internet and alternative media, so that people have access to more information from which to develop their own views.

Bolivia is a country with an indigenous and multicultural majority, but from its foundation it was ruled by big landowners and then by neoliberal capitalists. Under the governments led by Morales, for the first time in history the indigenous people took power through elections.

It wasn’t an easy task to raise up a country that was largely broken and privatised, while trying to guarantee a better quality of life for the whole population. MAS government measures included:

  • Nationalising various businesses, with the state resuming the power of administration and redistribution of profits, thus combatting poverty.
  • Implementing literacy programmes, issuing identity documents, providing food and improving nutrition.
  • Redistributing land, with public consultation via a referendum.
  • Implementing programmes to improve education, providing modern teaching materials, technology and new infrastructure.
  • Guaranteeing a system of universal free healthcare.
  • Supporting national production and exports, and offering incentives to small businesses.
  • Coming to new agreements with international business, making Bolivia attractive for foreign investment. This state policy enabled an important rate of economic growth, the highest in Latin America in recent years.

What do you think will happen in the coming months and years in Bolivia?
The initial challenge is to achieve justice for the massacres in Senkata and Sacaba, and in the process ensure that all groups (including the right-wing political parties, military leaders, and elements of the police) acknowledge that what took place in 2019 was a coup. It’s important that the forces of the left and the indigenous peoples use their first years in power to resolve this dispute with the military and right-wing sectors. Meeting this first challenge will provide more stability and security for the Bolivian social forces, which have renewed energy after the 2020 national elections.

Also, the eruption into the political sphere of new forces with structural demands, such as feminist and environmental movements, will create areas of debate and political action to which the government will have to respond.

In the Plurinational State of Bolivia, nature itself has legal rights within the constitution. The government seeks to achieve development in harmony with nature, respecting and accepting its conditions, alongside promoting collective well-being (the concept of Buen Vivir) and respect for the culture and languages of the indigenous nations. The challenge is how to move beyond regulations and declarations, and turn proposals into a tangible reality. How can state action enable moving beyond capitalism and patriarchy?

Collective authorship: Wiphala Movement Germany

We are people from all layers of society and fervent supporters of democracy, justice and harmony. We represent a network of friends inspired by the Wiphala symbol. We defend the emancipation of the indigenous people. We are against the abuse of power and the oppression and exploitation of the Bolivian people.

Links

Movimiento Wiphala Alemania

https://www.facebook.com/112673237095875/videos/3467901229962228

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ_nZ6zc6LM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzWe19H1rgU&t=7s

https://www.facebook.com/WiphalasacrosstheWorld

Syrien Hilfe

Collecting help for the bombing victims in Syria


22/01/2021

Until 19 February 2021, Syrien Hilfe is taking part in a relief campaign for refugees in the region of Idlib in the North West of Syria. We are collecting donations in Berlin which, together with our trustworthy partners, we will send to Syria.

Perhaps you remember the news headlines. Countless people fled there to protect themselves from the bombing. In the absence of accommodation, they are living in tents in olive tree fields or even in the open air – and now it’s Winter.

How can you help? The products which your organisation may provide are urgently needed in the local camps. It would truly be a great help if you could would make part of your produce available as a donation. Among other things, we are collecting:

  • bicycles

  • wheelchairs

  • blankets, bedding, pillows and mattresses

  • sports equipment

  • school equipment, stationery, school supplies

  • medical aids

  • sanitary products such as nappies

100% of our help goes to the people in need – we have guaranteed this for years! If you need a receipt for your donation, of course we can send them.

We are collecting donations in the Haus der Statistik in Berlin Mitte (Otto-Braun-Straße 70-72) between 25th January 2021 and 19th February. You can also ring Project Manager Hiba Albassir at 0152 / 33608076.

————————————————————————————————————-

About our association: The association SyrienHilfe e.V. was formed in 2012 and is a recognized charity. We provide humanitarian and emergency help for Syrian refugees mainly inside Syria, but also in the neighbouring countries Lebanon in Turkey. We support or realise different self-help projects and training projects and take care of medical treatment of ill people and invalids as much as our resources allow.

————————————————————————————————————-

We would welcome your support. Families and children are living in rubble and we want to offer them a future.

————————————————————————————————————-

Send any financial donations to the following bank account

SyrienHilfe e.V.
Konto-Nr. 1212 2012
BLZ: 665 623 00
VR-Bank in Mittelbaden eG
IBAN: DE80 665 623 0000 1212 2012
BIC: GENODE61IFF

News from Berlin and Germany: 23 January, 2021

Weekly news roundup from Berlin and Germany

Compiled by Ana Ferreira

 

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Possible migrant quota in Berlin’s civil service

A migrant quota for Berlin’s civil service may be legally permissible, but only after an amendment to the city constitution. Integration Senator Elke Breitenbach (die LINKE) nevertheless considers her bill permissible. A similar dilemma, considering the origin of the applicants, existed decades ago with the demand for equality for women in the civil service. It was solved by including an explicit equality mandate (in Article 10 of the Berlin constitution): “The state is obliged to establish and ensure equality and equal participation of women and men in all areas of social life. Measures of promotion are permissible to compensate for existing inequalities.” Source: taz

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Donald Trump exits, but QAnon gains support in Germany

It’s January 6, the day of the mob forming on Capitol Hill. A German woman thanks the mobbers on her message on “QPatrioten24,” a Telegram group. Another member of that group denounces “electoral fraud” in the US presidential election, calling for “martial law.” Although on the fringes of the German QAnon community on Telegram, “QPatrioten24” is deeply rooted in the country’s wider conspiracy community. Its members are active in German anti-government protests, in August last year. When discussing protests, they urge each other to “show up without masks.” Within a year, Germany has become home to the largest QAnon community outside of the English-speaking world. Source: dw

Germany extends COVID lockdown until February 14

Germany has decided to continue with the lockdown until at least mid-February. The new, tougher measures will also see people wearing filter masks in shops and on public transport. Most shops, schools and non-essential business will remain closed. The new measures include stricter rules on the types of masks that must be worn in certain public places (FFP2), and employers must, wherever possible, allow employees to work from home until March 15. Contact at private meetings is also restricted to just one other person not living in the same household and schools are largely closed and students are taught through distance learning. Source: dw

Dr Kristina Hänel convicted for advertising abortions legally

The Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Frankfurt has declared that the conviction of the Giessen doctor Kristina Hänel for advertising the termination of pregnancy is legally binding and dismissed her appeal. The medical doctor’s homepage not only provided information that abortions would be performed, but also contained detailed information on the “how”. In a statement, Hänel announced a constitutional complaint against the non-appealable decision. “In other countries like Ireland, Argentina, South Korea, the laws are being liberalised, nowhere else is there a criminal law paragraph that prohibits factual information.” Source: süddeutsche

AfD may be classified as right-wing extremists

The Office for the Protection of the Constitution could classify the AfD as a suspected right-wing extremist case. Associations are making clear appeals to the officials in the party. Jörg Radek, deputy head of the police union (GdP), said that “Police service and involvement with the AfD do not go together.” The agency which protects the Constitution might announce next week how it will continue to deal with the AfD. And there is much to suggest that it will be upgraded to a suspected right-wing extremist organisation. The AfD intends to file lawsuits against this in the event of such a classification. Source: taz

Merkel continuity candidate Laschet becomes CDU leader

Armin Laschet has won the election for CDU leader at the digital party conference by a margin of 55 votes against Friedrich Merz. Laschet stressed he wants to build on continuity with Angela Merkel’s chancellorship and on his experience in government. However, it is unclear what will happen after the election for party chair in the CDU and CSU. In spring, those parties want to agree on who should be the candidate for chancellor. Laschet will also have to prove how well he can support the party in the upcoming state elections in Rhineland-Palatinate and Baden-Württemberg in March. Source: nd

Drosten fears up to 100,000 new Coronavirus cases per day

Many experts say that the number of cases in the Corona pandemic should ease in the summer – but virologist Christian Drosten of Berlin’s Charité hospital does not share this hope. On the contrary, he warns of a third wave with tens of thousands of new infections per day. But Drosten has some sympathy for the “Zero Covid” strategy. The virologist recommends pushing the seven-day R-value to 0.7 now, which would halve the number of cases within one week. Drosten also reiterated that the Coronavirus is far more dangerous than a flu virus. Source: ntv

Union Berlin’s Disappointing Response to Racism

A recent event at Union Berlin has led some to suggest that German football has a racism problem. Is this true, and if it is, who should deal with it?


21/01/2021

 

Friday should have been a night to remember. A night filled with nothing but positives for the Bundesliga. FC Union Berlin, the only club in Germany’s top league that once competed in the German Democratic Republic. Union Berlin are currently in sixth place after defeating third placed Bayer Leverkusen. This is a huge achievement for Union, whose record signing cost just €2 million, pennies in comparison to Leverkusen’s €26.5 million summer purchase.

Germany’s Nadiem Amiri. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Austria license. Attribution: Ailura, CC BY-SA 3.0 AT

 

This impressive victory, however, has been overshadowed by a defender on the Berlin side shouting a racist insult and the club’s subsequent passive response. The winning goal was controversial, as a foul was committed by a Union player in the build up play. Leverkusen’s Nadiem Amiri, a German national born in Ludwigshafen to Afghan parents, was particularly incensed over the decision. In the ensuing argument between the two sets of players, Berlin’s Florian Hübner allegedly shouted “Scheiß Afghane,” or “shit Afghan.”

There seem to be multiple racist, xenophobic, and homophobic scandals in football every year. How is the sport supposed to address this never-ending issue if its clubs and governing bodies are not prepared to harshly punish those players and fans that make such statements?

Nadiem Amiri Going Above and Beyond

The Leverkusen players Jonathan Tah and Kerem Demirbay told the press in a post match interview about what was said towards Amiri, but they refused to openly identify the culprit. When asked to shed more light on the situation, Demirbay ,responded with, “No, that’s not my style… What happens on the pitch stays on the pitch.”

The following day, Amiri ,stated, “he [still not openly identifying Union’s Florian Hübner] came to me in the dressing room. Ugly words were uttered out of emotions, which he is very sorry about. He has given me believable assurance of that, therefore the matter is settled for me.” Amiri is going above and beyond here to let Hübner off the hook by accepting that such a comment can be played off as an emotional response.

To be born and raised in Germany, play proudly for the national team, and then be racially abused on the pitch, must cut deep. Many would not be so quick to accept Hübner’s apology.

Union Berlin’s Passive Response

Photo: Silesia711. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license

 

Union then ,quote tweeted Amiri’s statement, writing that the club “completely distances itself from racism and discrimination in football and in our society. To be clear: it’s not acceptable in any form.” The next logical step would be for Union to punish the player that levelled the racist insult. Instead, the rest of the tweet read, “After discussions between the clubs and players, we are now waiting on the outcome of the investigation of the DFB [German football’s governing body].” The club must know that it was Hübner who apologised to Amiri, so why not immediately fine and suspend him?

Well, some at Union seem to think that Hübner’s insult was not problematic. Club Manager Oliver Ruhnert, for instance, ,argued that the situation cannot be interpreted as a “scandal of a racist nature. In the heat of the moment, things may have been perceived differently from the way they fell. For the player in question, it is relatively difficult to talk about racism. He is known to be in a relationship with a woman who is not white.”

Essentially, Ruhnert made the classic false argument that because one has a nonwhite/non-German friend or spouse, it is therefore impossible for them to be racist or xenophobic. Issues of racism in the club will never be properly addressed if people like Ruhnert are in such leadership positions.

A Culture of Silence in Football

Football is a cutthroat profession. One serious injury or bad run of form and your career could be done. Very few players have any options outside of the sport. This means that those within football have a mutual respect for each other, and this could explain why there is a culture of silence concerning racism and xenophobia.

For example, the Amiri incident was not the only incident during Friday’s match. Leon Bailey, a black Jamaican forward for Leverkusen, was fouled and refused to be helped up by his opponent. A Berlin player can then be heard ,yelling, “Chill man, we’re in Germany.” Now, this remark is not nearly as bad as Hübner’s, but shows what kind of insults are seemingly tolerated. Insults which can only now be heard because every match is played without fans.

Germany’s Kerem Demirbay. Photo: Oleg Bkhambri (Voltmetro). This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication

 

These xenophobic insults are unacceptable, but it seems as if many players want to handle such issues internally and not broadcast the offenders name to the media. That could explain why Leverkusen’s Tah and Demirbay, the two players who spoke to the media, refused to say Hübner’s name, and why Amiri was so quick to accept the apology. Demirbay even explained that he will not identify the culprit because he has “respect for his opponent.”

The Job of Rooting Out Racism Rests on the Clubs and Governing Bodies

No one should expect footballers to rat out their fellow colleagues. This is a job for the clubs and football’s governing bodies. Union Berlin and the DFL must come down hard on Hübner, showing that such disgusting remarks have no place in the sport. With no fans, the microphones pick up almost everything. There are no excuses this time.

Netherlands: Kafkaesque, racist persecution of welfare recipients pushes government over the brink

On 15th January, the Dutch government resigned following the wrongful prosecution of tens of thousands of parents. Freek Blauwhof reports on government racial profiling and unprecedented injustice


20/01/2021

On Friday the 15th of January, the Dutch government resigned following a massive outcry over the Dutch tax offices wrongful prosecution of tens of thousands of parents, most of them with migration background or double nationality. After years of wilful ignorance and condoning silence, the cabinet of prime minister Rutte (VVD) is now “taking its responsibility” just two months before the general election. But the government’s resignation is more show than substance.

The scandal has been building for years and goes back to the “zero tolerance policy” on welfare fraud of the first government of prime minister Rutte in 2010. From 2012 on, the Dutch tax and welfare authorities started increasingly to profile parents who received nursery subsidy. In the following seven years, between 25.000 and 35.000 parents, mostly with double nationality, Turkish or Arabic sounding names have been wrongfully prosecuted for benefits fraud on trumped up charges or because of minor procedural mistakes in the application. Most of them were forced to pay back thousands of Euros in welfare payments, resulting in some cases in loss of their homes or jobs, in divorce and in one case even in suicide.

In June 2020, the Dutch parliament voted to convene a parliamentary enquiry commission on the political mishandling of the case. The commission published a damning report in December 2020 which carries the title “unprecedented injustice”. The report condemned politicians and leading public servants for continuing to persecute people even when they have every reason to believe the parents had done nothing wrong. The responsible minister for economic affairs, Eric Wiebes of the right wing liberal VVD, even said during the public hearings that his impression was that “the tax office warned me that they really are too soft”!

This draconian persecution is doubly outrageous considering the Netherlands’ status as one of the biggest tax havens of Europe. Apart from the Netherlands, only the Virgin Islands enable more corporations to dodge their taxes, resulting in the loss of 22 billion Euros of tax revenue worldwide every year. Had the Dutch government cared foremost about public finances, they would have started there.

The motive behind the crackdown was however not fiscal prudence but disapproval of “welfare scroungers” and the ambition to “switch off the [welfare] taps”, which the head of the tax office taskforce on fraud Hans Blokpoel admitted. Above all, premier Rutte’s right wing liberal party VVD has been lurching ever more to the right and flaunting a so called zero tolerance policy. This is a classic right wing campaign scapegoating welfare recipients, who are framed mostly as unwanted migrants, in a bid to compete with the country’s growing extreme right.

As one might expect, this dynamic is a motif that permeates politics in the Netherlands since the neoliberal turn in the 90s and the rise of the extreme right since Pim Fortuyn in the 2000s. This atmosphere has facilitated the neoliberal downsizing of welfare programmes while at the same time allowing for successive right wing governments to increase repressive and surveillance measures against recipients. These policies have led to incredible stories, for instance when last December, a woman on benefits was fined 7000 Euros for failing to report that her mother occasionally did some grocery shopping for her.

Institutional racism was part and parcel of the “fraud” persecution scandal. Personal data were used in computer databases in which foreign sounding names or double nationalities were considered a “risk factor”. The head of the Authority on Personal Data, Aleid Wolfsen, concluded that “the entire system was set up to discriminate and was used as such.” Even artificial intelligence was applied to filter out such “risk factors”. At the very least, 11.000 parents were profiled in such a way.

And it is exactly on this point that the parliamentary enquiry report remains shamefully silent. While it does shed light on the decision making and bureaucratic measures that led to the injustice, it does not once mention the term racism. The word discrimination only comes up once in the 133 pages long text. This is especially remarkable considering prime minister Rutte has himself been convicted of ethnically profiling Somalian Dutch people when he was secretary of state for social services in 2007. He reacted to the judges’ verdict by saying “Apparently that is not legally possible now. It’s high time to change the law.”

Mark Rutte and his government finally resigned so as not to jeopardise his chances at the general elections on March the 17th. According to the polls, the scandal has not so much as scratched him or his party’s chances. The VVD is set to win big, by around 7 percentage points. The other partners, the christian democrat CDA and the culturally less right wing liberals of D66, are predicted to lose slightly. There is therefore no reason to believe that the policies which led to the overzealous prosecutions will fundamentally change any time soon.

Neither are the left wing opposition parties well positioned to profit from the crisis in government because they have failed to consitently oppose the neoliberal and racist policies of Rutte’s governments. The Greens of Groenlinks voted for the Fraud Law that introduced fines and the forced full repayment of welfare money for recipients who make minor procedural mistakes. The Socialist Party MP Jasper van Dijk has been railing for years about welfare fraud committed by migrant workers.

If the Left is to roll back the years of neoliberal and racist rollback of the welfare state and workers’ rights, they will have to seriously change course and start to, finally, consistently oppose cuts, privatisation, infringements of personal rights and the racism that increasingly permeates mainstream society.

Freek Blauwhof has been active in Die Linke Berlin-Neukölln since 2010 and is a former member of the Dutch GreenLeft and Socialist Party. This article was written for theleftberlin