Racist offensive against Muslims in France

An antiracist’s guide


Islamophobia in France has been growing in strength for many years, but recent weeks have seen a dangerous acceleration.

The context

The brutal murder of a high school teacher on the 16th October by an isolated terrorist with a knife shocked the whole country. Macron’s neoliberal government has jumped on the opportunity to occupy some of the space that Marine Le Pen and her fascists had been taking up. The horrific killing on the 29th of October of three Catholics in a major church in Nice, in the South of France, by a young Muslim man who had only arrived in France a few days earlier, added fuel to the flames. This terror is being used by government and others to stigmatize all Muslims and to win votes from racists.

Fascist Marine Le Pen got ten million votes in the presidential elections in 2017, the highest score ever for the extreme Right. And President Macron has been extremely unpopular because of his plans to drastically cut pensions, (which led to millions being on strike last year). So, although he comes from a strand of the right which did not traditionally make a priority of islamophobia, it is just too tempting for him to play the scapegoat card.

This is especially easy for him because the left in France, including the radical Left, is very confused about Islamophobia. The situation has improved these last five years, due to the hard work of a minority of activists, but even today far fewer than half of left wingers think it is important to fight Islamophobia. In 2004, when the ban on young women wearing hijab in high schools began, there was practically no opposition. In 2016, when twenty or so town councils banned the wearing of full-body swimsuits on beaches and in swimming pools, opposition was limited to a few press releases at best. The Right know that when they theatrically attack Muslims, there will be only half-hearted opposition from the Left!

Macron’s Islamophobic campaign

Macron had already been preparing an offensive, based on a new law “against separatism”. He pretended that this law would be aimed at many different groups including White supremacists, but it is really about loudly spreading the racist myth that Muslims don’t want to be part of French society. This is an invented danger. In fact, Muslims are, for example, far less keen on having separate schools for their children than are devout Catholics or Jews. There are In France 9 000 private Catholic schools, 300 or so private Jewish schools and around 20 private Muslim schools (there are five and a half million Muslims).

This month’s crimes are very useful to Macron. A minute of silence and special classes on freedom of speech will be organized in all schools immediately after the school holidays. His government is banning Muslim organizations accused of being involved with “political Islam”, a usefully broad expression which allows charities, legal aid organizations and antiracist groupings to be targeted.

The Interior Minister, Darmanin announced raids on 51 organizations, and the compulsory dissolution of several. These include the Collective against Islamophobia (CCIF), a small organization which organizes mediation and helps provide lawyers for those defending themselves against Islamophobic discrimination at work or elsewhere. It is just about the only place one can go as a discriminated Muslim. The organization has received funding for some years from the town council in Grenoble in the East of France, and has regularly worked with the National Observatory on Secularism, which is a government body meant to supervise the division between state and religion in France. It has worked in collaboration with a number of United Nations bodies (being granted consultant status) for years and has always condemned terrorism. The banning order was so flimsy that the government’s experts’ main contention was that among the comments on the organization’s Facebook page (comments not made by the organization), one could find expressions of antisemitism.

Another group, which was banned on 28th October, is the charity Barakacity, founded in 2008, known for its ambitious campaign to provide clean water in parts of West Africa, its “rounds” to help homeless people in the Paris region, and its initiative paying funeral costs for refugees who have died at Calais or trying to cross to England. The organization is accused of “proselytising” because it is faith-based, whereas Catholic charities are not condemned for working from a faith perspective, which is everyone’s right in a democratic society.

A mosque in Pantin which in previous weeks had shown sympathy with criticisms of Samuel Paty’s teaching has been closed down, although there is zero evidence that the mosque leaders supported any violence. In the days after the murder, the Interior Minister Darmanin stated openly that they were hauling in many people unconnected with the murder investigation “because they wanted to get the message over”. Macron has declared “fear must now change sides” and is pushing the idea of a “clash of civilizations”.

Darmanin declared last week he was “shocked” by halal or kosher food sections in supermarkets. These, he said are based on people’s “lower instincts” and represent “the beginnings of communitarianism”. A few weeks ago, the same minister declared “Islam in France must be certain that all its believers accept that the laws of the Republic are superior to the laws of their God”. But it is common for believers in many religions to think of their God as superior to human institutions – this does not make them killers! Darmanin just wants a witch hunt.

What is the immediate danger?

If these Muslim organizations are banned without protest, we can expect even worse in the future. Already far right thugs are taking advantage of the new atmosphere. In Nîmes a supermarket displayed a poster saying no “veiled women” would be allowed in the shop. The oldest mosque in Bordeaux, and another in Montélimar have been smashed up. Several mosques in Rouen received threatening letters, while in Donzère on Thursday a Muslim prayer room was vandalized with graffitied insults and Christian crosses.

Using Islamophobia to attack the Left

As well as win racist votes, Macron hopes to use the crisis to damage the main Left opposition, painting them as “soft on Islamic extremism”. Left reformist Jean-Luc Mélenchon of the France Insoumise (Rebel France) got seven million votes at the last presidential elections on a Corbyn-style radical programme. For a long time weak, like the rest of the French Left, on fighting islamophobia, the France Insoumise has recently made progress, partly under the pressure of Black and Muslim antiracist networks which have been getting stronger. One of the FI, MPs, Danièle Obono, has been involved in fighting Islamophobia for many years.

In November 2019, for the first time ever, a mass demonstration against Islamophobia was organized in Paris. Against considerable internal opposition, Mélenchon insisted that the FI must support. Education Minister Blanquer accused the FI this week of being “Islamo-leftists” and being “in favour of an ideology which little by little leads to terrorism”.

These attacks are supported by some on the Left. There is a long and disastrous tradition in France of equating being left-wing with detesting and mocking believers. Over the last 25 years, this tradition has fuelled the attacks on Islam in France. Many left-wingers, using the excuse that they hate all religions, support Islamophobic laws and campaigns. One of the main revolutionary newspapers denounced women wearing niqab as “birds of death” on its front page in 2010 (although this current, now the NPA, has made a lot of progress since and supported the demonstration last November, even if only half its members were really convinced).

University lecturers under attack

Macron’s ministers have been turning to Trump-style Right populism and attacking university lecturers who dare to work on racism and anti-racism and not limit themselves to studying dead White men. Education Minister Blanquer claimed that universities had been infiltrated by “very powerful Islamo-leftist currents which are wreaking havoc”. “We must fight” he said “against an intellectual framework imported from American universities and ideas of intersectionality which want to fix identities, the contrary of the Republican model (…) This is the basis of a splitting-up of society which converges with the Islamic model”.

University organizations have protested at these insults. Even the coordination of all the university presidents in France (hardly a radical Left body) put out a declaration that denounced Blanquer’s insults, saying “No, universities are not producing an ideology which leads to the worst excesses. No, universities are not places where fanaticism is expressed or encouraged. No, universities cannot be accused of being accomplices to terrorism.” Other academic organizations have also protested, although inside many there are members who swallow the myths about “Islamo-leftists”. Scandalously, a hundred university professors signed an article in Le Monde in support of Blanquer, and denouncing Muslim students who wear a hijab (see this article for more information).

What is the role of the caricatures of Mohammed?

A series of caricatures was initially published by a Danish right-wing newspaper. To these, Charlie Hebdo added more insulting examples, before the horrible attack in 2015 by terrorists who murdered 12 of the magazine’s staff (and Jewish shoppers in a Kosher supermarket the same day). The caricatures are racist for at least two reasons. Firstly, they include such cartoons as Mohammed with a bomb in his turban, with the fuse lit. This drawing is supposed 1) to say that what is typical of Muslims is to be terrorists and 2) to get people to laugh at the fact that his Muslim head is about to explode. The other Charlie Hebdo caricatures – like one of Mohammed naked with his genitals showing – propose a different sort of “satisfaction” to the reader, based on the fact that readers know that Muslims do not think the prophet should be depicted in drawing, much less depicted naked and ridiculous. The only way you could find this cartoon funny is if you think that offending Muslims is fun in itself – that is, if you are a racist.

In the present crisis, the cartoons have played a pivotal role. As part of his civics class every year, Samuel Paty showed some of the racist cartoons, having warned pupils and allowed them to leave the room for a moment if they wished. Not understanding that these caricatures are racist is very common indeed on right and left in France, and explaining about the caricatures is part of the school curriculum, so showing them in class as illustrations does not mean that this was a racist teacher. This year some parents complained, and the school inspectorate organized a discussion meeting of some sort. Naturally, No one imagined all this would come to the ears of a teenage fanatic who lived 50 miles away and was ready to kill and die for this.

After the murder, those who wanted to push “clash of civilizations” nonsense decided to make the caricatures the centre of the protest against terrorism. In some big cities like Toulouse and Montpellier, the caricatures were projected onto the front of the town hall, while more than one regional government has announced that booklets of caricatures including these will be distributed to all high school children. It is not uncommon to hear individual teachers, even on the Left, demand that showing the caricatures be compulsory in all schools as a protest against Samuel Paty’s murder. This is often the work of loud minorities – at the mass rally in Paris called by teaching unions, there were only a dozen Charlie Hebdo placards in a crowd of tens of thousands, and in online forums, Islamophobic teachers complain that “almost all” their students think it is good not to mock people’s religious beliefs, because respect is important.

What about the far right and the fascists?

In Avignon this week a member of a small neo-Nazi group threatened a North African shopkeeper, and then the police, and was shot dead. The danger of far-right terrorism is real.
As for Le Pen and her “respectable fascists”, they have had a bad couple of years. The Yellow Vest revolt which mobilized poor workers and small business people could have moved towards far-right ideas, but did not, thanks to the work of Left activists. The mass strikes against government destruction of the retirement pensions system last year were very popular indeed, but Le Pen could not support them because of her strong small employer base.

At last with the campaign against Muslims, Le Pen has a terrain where she feels at home. She has been calling this week for a freeze on all immigration, and on all procedures through which immigrants gain French citizenship. She is demanding “wartime legislation” and declaring “Nobody should be afraid of being called an Islamophobe”. Her and her fellow fascists are invited every week to prime-time talk shows to spread their poison.

Who is fighting back against all this?

The situation is contradictory. Several Left groups and trade union federations are much better on Islamophobia than they were ten years back (this is not difficult). Nevertheless, protest remains symbolic. Press releases from the Left declare « Muslims must not be blamed for terrorism, singled out or marginalized ». But no major Left group is saying “Defend the CCIF!” and protesting alongside Muslim groups to stop them being banned, let alone organizing a broad protest alliance. Smaller antiracist networks are doing what they can.

The hypocrisy of the Macron government, who sell arms to dictatorships all over the world, use French troops to defend French interests while wreaking death and destruction, and give crucial political support to Israel, while claiming to be a beacon of light leading the fight against political violence in the world, must be denounced. But practical solidarity to Muslim organizations under threat is also essential. Organizations in other countries should certainly send messages of solidarity.