The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

“There’s A Lot Of Rage We All Feel, But More Than That, I Feel Love And Concern For My Friends”

Anam Raheem and Matt Davis call on our collective empathy to raise funds for Palestinians.


03/05/2025

Gaza Champions is a mutual aid network founded by Anam Raheem and Matt Davis that places people in direct contact with families in need of support in Gaza, allowing them to directly fundraise for those hit hardest by the war. The champions are also pen pals with their families in Gaza, learning about their lives and experiences, building morale and helping them to better tell their stories. In times of staunch political division and polarization, Gaza Champions manages to cut through, and in its own way, enables people across the world to make small, albeit concrete contributions to the lives of people, who they now have meaningful relationships with. The Left Berlin spoke to Anam and Matt to learn more about the organization.

TLB: Can you tell us about your connection to Gaza?

Anam Raheem: Both Matt and I worked for Mercy Corps, which is an American international humanitarian aid organization. Specifically, we were working for a program called Gaza Sky Geeks, a Google-backed tech hub in Gaza City. The idea was to connect the youth in Gaza to the outside world, to earn dignified incomes by participating in the global tech industry. It wasn’t a typical NGO job where we were in an office and would have field visits. Instead, we were based in a community center in Gaza. We would have hundreds of people come through our doors every day, and so, we developed very close relationships with the people in Gaza, irrespective of whether they were our team members or people who participated in our program.

TLB: When was this roughly?

AR: So I was there from 2017 to 2021, and Matt left just before October 7 2023. 

TLB: And it was after that that when you started thinking about Gaza Champions, right?

AR: Yeah, so it started about a year ago. As I’m sure you know, all these GoFundMes started coming out of Gaza. And because Matt and I both have a huge network in Gaza, many GoFundMes started coming our way. At first, I was just using my Instagram page to share GoFundMes, to try and tell the story of this or that person, and mobilize my small network to contribute. But very quickly it became overwhelming– with hundreds of GoFundMes it wasn’t effective to just fill my Instagram with these stories. 

I have a friend in DC and she sort of naturally connected with some of my friends from Gaza on Instagram, and formed a pen pal relationship with one of them, and started promoting her GoFundMe, saying “This is this person, this is what I’ve learnt about them – let’s support them!” And that planted the seed for me– this one to one relationship where someone is just telling the story of someone in Gaza in a very human way, and using their platform to mobilize funds for them. At the time the border was open, so there was hope for their evacuation, but these days, with the border closed, people still need to survive day-to-day life, the cost of which is severely inflated during wartime. 

I started out by simply writing a call for volunteers in the notes app on my phone and posting a screenshot of it on Instagram. That post went pretty far, I think the first wave was about 60 people. And then I told Matt about this idea and we created a spreadsheet to have a mechanism to start matching the GoFundMes we have with people who are volunteering. And that’s how Gaza Champions was born. 

MD: For the first six months of the genocide, we were in shock, like everyone else. We were doing what we could, posting and so on, but by February or March it had gotten to the point where everyone in Gaza had run out of money and needed help, so it was a way of dealing with that feeling of wanting to share stuff my friends were sending me, but knowing that that wasn’t going to help.

TLB: So it sounds like the pen pal connection was part of it from the beginning.

AR: Yeah, the idea was that it wouldn’t be this anonymous thing, and that you would be in direct contact with someone, supporting them. I think what’s really effective, is being able to tell a story over time– this is a person I know in Gaza, this is what they went through this month, and from our fundraising, they were able to get a tent, for example. Some champions FaceTime with their person in Gaza with their whole family, so the whole family rallies around them and checks in on them and wants to know how they’re doing. It’s flourished beyond what I could have even hoped for. 

TLB: There’s also a kind of accountability that comes through that as well – there’s a degree of responsibility that you feel as the connection with your family grows. 

MD: It’s not even accountability, it just makes it feel more real. That’s the amazing way in which it has bloomed. When we worked at Sky Geeks there were about 40 people in the office, and some of them were super close friends, while others I would chat with but I wouldn’t still be close with them. But they’ve connected with some of my friends in England and now they’re really close friends, better than I ever knew them in person. So it’s that human element.

AR: Yeah, the thing that’s really motivating is friendship, right? If the world has turned on your friends you would do whatever you could to help them. And I think that is what keeps me sane, because there’s a lot of rage we all feel, but more than that rage, I feel love and concern for my friends. It’s also a great way of bringing people into the cause. You’re not just fighting for this abstract “Free Palestine” concept, you have someone in Gaza to help get through this. It keeps people motivated and helps not to burn out or give up.

TLB: Do you have any way of measuring the impact? Do you know how much you’ve raised across all of the different Champions?

MD: The short answer is we have no idea. At one point I was trying to track it a little bit, by looking on GoFundMe how much money had been raised before and after we connected people. But it’s hard to track because there’s no public API for GoFundMe, so getting the data is really hard. 

AR: Yeah, we are doing this in a totally voluntary capacity. We know that we have 150-ish champions in 13 countries. In terms of impact, we have some beautiful anecdotal evidence– some people that were able to evacuate directly, and others who have had months of groceries covered because of their champions. But, yes, we don’t have a dollar figure estimate because we just don’t have the capacity. 

TLB: Have you had any political opposition or pushback to the project?

AR: Well, generally speaking, it has been pretty insulated from the pushback and hate. I think that’s primarily because this is mutual aid, not protest or direct advocacy, keeping it very human to human. Especially compared to all the other kinds of actions and demonstrations and how charged things can get, Gaza Champions is like, warm and fuzzy. 

There was one champion who reached out to me to say “Someone in my network googled the person I’m championing and found tweets around October 7, celebrating this act of resistance, so I don’t know if I can champion this person anymore.” I then reasoned with them, that while it was up to them to champion or not, I would call into question the motives of someone who put in their time and effort to look up someone enduring genocide, to find a reason not to support their humanity or support their survival.

It brings in the perfect-victim framework that Mohammed el-Kurd puts into context in his book, Perfect Victims. We need Palestinians to be ideologically pure, according to Western standards, to be worthy of our care and support. This is just one instance, but that person has continued to be a champion, and it shows how this can expand people’s political education around Palestine, because you’re not just thinking of it as an abstract cause, these are living, breathing humans. 

Violence sucks, but we can understand that if someone is living under oppression, they have seen so much death, so much loss, and so much loss of opportunity. So if they see this as the first punch thrown against their oppressors, I can understand why someone might look at that day and feel a certain way, feel a certain catharsis. And it goes beyond that. You get to understand Islam through them, you get to witness Ramadan through them. So this is a really beautiful form of political education, that’s very practical, and isn’t in the form of demonstration or protest.

Something else that comes up a lot, is people wanting to know if these are verified campaigns. And it’s tricky, because it’s verified in the way that mutual aid is just a network, right? We know a lot of these people directly, but we also don’t know some of them. It’s just all word of mouth. So our rule is that it’s either someone we know directly or it’s being referred to by someone we trust– that’s the extent of our verification. On top of that, a lot of people want to be donating to a registered non-profit with a 501(c)(3) status– things that have, like, a Western stamp of approval. So Gaza Champions is about shifting how we think about aid in Palestine, or in a war-torn region, by going directly to people in a mutual aid format, as opposed to having our resources gate kept by big organizations. 

MD: Anam and I were both working at a major NGO where we had to deal with a lot of red tape, and our hands were tied in a lot of situations, so being able to just do this has been very freeing. I love that there’s this moment where we connect people, and just say “Okay, you guys go do it.” When people are first connected, there might be some uncertainty, but as the relationship builds, it resolves the issue of verification– I don’t think that any of our champions would ever be questioning the people they are raising money for. And sure, we have more families who need help than champions at the moment, so you see why the red tape developed, because we just have to randomly pick cases. But it can also be a barrier, when you have to tell people you can’t help them because they don’t meet a certain set of criteria. 

Going in, we had no idea of what it was going to become. I don’t think at any point did we expect it to get this big. And this has been a group learning experience, where one champion does one thing, and then they share that with others. This natural evolution– that is what solidarity is. The past two years have been really horrible, and there have been so many awful moments, and me and Anam have said to each other many times that doing Gaza Champions is what got us through.  

AR: Yeah, it absolutely has kept me afloat. We are deeply personally affected by it, so to see that there are other people who care, and want to do something, even if they have never been to Gaza, is really uplifting. I like to focus on that. Of course there are the toxic trolls, and they make me want to do bad things, but if I didn’t have Gaza Champions, I don’t know where I would be right now.

You can support Gaza Champions or become one yourself! Sign up here.

Red Flag: Why Berlin’s Revolutionary May Day Was So Huge

In his weekly column, Nathaniel Flakin reports from 1. Mai.

For most Berliners, 1. Mai is about going to a park to dance, drink, and soak up some sun after an interminable winter — Görlitzer Park was packed with tens of thousands of revelers. For the city’s leftists, though, May Day is the most intense, longest, and best day of the year. It’s Commie Christmas.

The Maifeier or May Celebration has a long history in Berlin. Protests have taken place every year since 1890. But this year, the 135th anniversary, feels different. Germany is set to get a new Kanzler next Tuesday. The Blackrock gremlin Friedrich Merz promises to combine austerity with militarism and far-right culture war: hundreds of billions for the military and cuts for social programs. Merz hasn’t even been elected, and he’s already among the least popular politicians in the country, with 56 percent declaring him “nicht gut” and just 38 percent “gut”

The rise of the far-right AfD, endless rent increases, and racist fear mongering brought Berliners onto the streets on May Day.

Union Morning

In the morning, up to 10,000 people joined a demonstration by the German Union Confederation (DGB). Every German city has an official union rally featuring beer, bratwurst, and bad music. Social democratic politicians like to make appearances. Since post-war (West) Berlin has almost always had social democratic mayors, so public-sector workers have to demonstrate alongside their boss.

And so many choose to sleep in, only a tiny sliver of Berlin’s union members take to the streets. For the bureaucrats, this has long been an “alibi” event, doing as little as possible to claim they at least did something. I could never think of any other reason to pick an impossible time (usually 10am on a holiday!) and relatively unknown meeting points. They don’t put up posters nor send out e-mails to their members. Even people looking for the demonstration didn’t have an easy time finding it on the DGB website. 

Back in 2022, then mayor Franziska Giffey was booed out for ten minutes as she tried to speak from a May Day stage. People were unhappy that she was refusing to implement the referendum that called for the expropriation of big housing companies. After Egg Day [editor’s note: a protestor threw an egg at Giffey], big politicians have avoided the space.

Yet even as union bosses refuse to mobilize, and union members sleep in – the proletarian Left keeps turning up. This year, the Class Struggle Bloc made up perhaps half of the demonstration. That was — more than all the union blocs together, according to junge Welt. Last year, “antideutsch” union stewards made ham-fisted attempts to expel the leftists. But that became such an embarrassment that there were no more attempts by DGB leaders to kick out half the participants.

Revolutionary Evening

As the sun was setting over Kreuzberg, tens of thousands of people gathered at Südstern for a revolutionary demonstration. By all rights, it should have been at Hermannplatz, but police have banned gatherings at this more political location. Over the next few hours, the crowd grew to 30,000 people. There was a hard core of several thousand anarchist and communist militants in tight formations, surrounded by several times as many supporters.

This goes back to the Kiezaufstand, the neighborhood uprising in Kreuzberg on May 1, 1987, when residents plundered dozens of shops and burned down a supermarket. That inspired an independent demonstration the following year, which has now taken place for 37 years, and wanders south toward Neukölln at a glacial pace.

Berlin police brought 6,000 officers to the scene, including water cannons and metal fences. But as the revolutionaries marched through the streets, cops generally held back and the mood remained peaceful. The unavoidable conclusion from decades of Revolutionary May Day — just about 100 percent of violence can be traced back to police. To put it scientifically: No cops, no problems.

Yet while the march was largely peaceful, police couldn’t let us reach the end without creating some images to justify the tens of millions of euros they spent on repression. Shortly before we returned to Südstern, they attacked the Palestine bloc and detained several dozen people. I won’t demean myself by repeating their ridiculous justifications for violence, which have been obediently repeated by bourgeois politicians and journalists.

The great thing about Berlin’s May Day is how it connects different struggles. Yesterday, Palestine was everywhere — like one would expect at left-wing demonstrations in every other country. I was pleasantly surprised when an autonomist feminist bloc, all decked out in purple, declared that people who didn’t support Palestine weren’t welcome. Yesterday’s demonstration was probably the biggest demonstration in support of Gaza Berlin has seen in the last 18 months.

What is the point of German Memory Culture when it has no universal application?

Holding a sign saying “Haven’t we learned from the Holocaust?” will now get you prosecuted and fined €1,500 in Germany

Editor’s note: This is an interview with someone who was recently fined €1,500 by a Berlin court for holding up a sign. She prefers to remain anonymous. Most of the interview was taken in the middle of April, 2025.

Thanks for talking to us. Could you first tell us a little about who you are?

I’m 31 years old. I came here to Berlin one and a half years ago. I was living in Bielefeld before. I really like this city because of its international people. Then, there are so many possibilities in Berlin. I also came here to do more acting.

I arrived around the same time as the start of the war in Palestine. I felt there were so many people who were engaged in this topic. What was different to Bielefeld was that people were so naturally politically active. I really appreciated that people were shaping politics in the sense of our democratic values.

As the war in Gaza went on and so many people died I felt as if I also have to engage in any kind of action, since the war got absurd. And disproportionate. I felt very helpless. I wanted to ask the government: “Why don’t you see what is happening?” We have a history in Germany, and we should have learned from this history. We also are responsible when war crimes are committed and we keep being silent. We should apply our knowledge of our history.

You wanted to do something. What sort of activities did you get involved in?

I thought, okay, maybe I could just go on the street on my own and remind people what our teachers in school always taught us about the Holocaust. They said that genocide should not happen again, nor should anything which has the character of  genocide.

So, I took two signs and went to the government building. On one sign I wrote: “Haben wir aus dem Holocaust nicht gelernt?” [Haven’t we learned from the Holocaust?], and on the other: “Nein, zu der Ermordung von derzeit 8.500 Zivilisten in Gaza” [No to the murder of 8,500 civilians in Gaza so far].

How did the police react to your action?

There were three policemen who were actually there for a demonstration by Neue Generation in the government quarter. They stopped me and read my papers. They contacted their Zentrale [headquarters] I think it was the Landeskriminalamt [State Criminal Police] but I am not sure, who said they have to investigate this. That’s when they told me: “You can’t continue with this.”

They then took my papers, they wrote something saying I might get an Anzeige [notification of a court hearing], and then they sent me home.

When was this?

It was the 3rd November 2023.

You did receive an Anzeige. When did that arrive?

Well, first I got a letter. It was just information. Following this, it took a lot of time—half a year or something. Then I got a yellow letter, which is a serious one.

What did it say?

It said that I was being accused of Volksverhetzung [hate speech].

And now you’re going to be in court. What’s your feeling about this?

I’m absolutely confused. It felt like I was doing something wrong, but I didn’t. I had not intended to do anything wrong. My teachers taught me in school that democracy also means to question, to say your opinion, to look from different perspectives, and to have the right to do so.

I had the a feeling that Germany has a progressive understanding/ imagination about Menschenrechte and Völkerrechte [human rights and international law] because of its history.

And now, when I talk about our historical  responsibility and humanitarian crimes in Gaza in one sentence, Germany starts to discuss the probability of playing down the Holocaust, instead of taking it seriously.

I would draw a comparison between the Holocaust and Gaza, but this is to point out that nothing similar to the Holocaust should ever happen again. The Holocaust is a benchmark we use to prevent a greater evil. What I mean is that in everything we do, we do make comparisons. How else can we know what goes too far?

And to repeat: all that you did was hold up one sign asking whether Germany has learned from the Holocaust and another sign opposing the violation of human rights in Gaza. It wasn’t antisemitic, it wasn’t racist, but now you’re facing trial because of this?

Yes.

How are you preparing for the trial? What sort of support have you received so far?

I spoke to a lot of people—to lawyers and organizations who have experience with this topic. They told me that it’s not a single case when it comes to a critic of Israel. There are many people who have experienced the same fate .

I don’t really feel alone with it, but on the other hand, I can’t  know how it will go because I feel that these cases are not normal cases. They are not judged in the same way.

Have you had the chance to talk to other people facing similar criminal charges to yours?

No, actually not. It seems difficult because nobody stands on the street and says: “Yes, I had the same experience”. 

It’s easier to get in touch with lawyers or organizations working in this field, especially those who have already worked on similar cases.

Has there been any media coverage of your case?

Not yet. There is one person who is writing about it, but she is the only one.

When is the court case going to be?

24th April of 2025

How can you ensure that you’re not left on your own?

I think it’s important to have a good lawyer who can give advice for a good defence. On top of this, there are so many groups who have taken on the mission of accompanying such cases. They provide both mental and physical support.

Before the trial started, they said that I could pay a fine of €200 and we wouldn’t go to court. I said: “No, I’m not paying. I’d rather go to court”, because I didn’t do anything wrong. What makes me feel safe is when we stand together and say: “No. They have no right to do this to us.”

What’s the worst that could happen if you lose the case?

If I lose the case, I could have to pay a lot of money, but that is not the worst that could happen. The worst is when the court decides that we are not allowed to say our opinions anymore.

So it’s not just about you?

No. I think it will continue like this if we don’t stay here and say: “Not with us!”

Is Germany different? There are similar things happening in the US and Britain, but maybe the public response is different?

I actually don’t know. What I know about Germany is that we are not allowed to criticize Israel, and if you do, you’re an antisemite. You can chose either you criticize the politics of Israel and you’re an antisemite, or you rather shut your mouth.

My teachings of the Holocaust is not to unconditionally support the country or the people who we committed  genocide against. Instead, we should learn from this history that genocide should never, ever happen to anybody.

Do you think things can get better in Germany?

(long pause)

I think people have shown us before that when the whole population is against something, it can be changed. We can make a difference.

How do we make more people want change?

That’s the point. I think people will only get angry about something when it’s about themselves. And I think that people don’t understand yet that my case also affects them.

So, what would you say to someone about why your case matters to them?

My freedom of opinion was taken away from me. Yes, Palestine is far away, and people ask, “What does the Middle East conflict has to do with me?” They say, “Palestine is not even a democracy. It is not their kind of system.”

But the point is, it is not about that. It is about us. When we are charged wrong because of  criticizing the state, then democracy disappears. Step by step.

So, if your freedom of opinion is restricted, then this can lead to similar restrictions on other people?

Definitely. What worries me is that there are so many cases of repression that are not even hidden by the state. It is getting normal.

We have so many cases now. We have your case. We have the Berlin 4 European and US citizens  who are threatened with deportation. We have Palestinians who are being deported to Greece already. Some people are appalled by this but don’t know what they can do about it. What do you think we can do to stop democracy being undermined?

(longer pause)

I am not a political scientist. But I think it’s more important than ever that we as a younger generation go into politics and have influence, and maybe find strategic ways to put pressure on certain systems.

You have had a horrible experience, and you’re still going through this experience. It would be very easy for you to say: “I’m not getting into any more trouble. I’m going to shut up”. This doesn’t seem to be your reaction. Why?

If something that belongs to you is taken away from you, would you just accept it? We should have the freedom of thought and speech in Germany, and nobody has the right to silence me by misinterpreting my words.

What’s your next step? We have the court case, what happens then?

My next step for this is to accompany the court cases of people who have been unfairly charged, to show them that they are not alone. But I think everybody should do whatever he or she is good in to support in our current and future political situation. 

We have to show them that we are not letting this go – even if we have to fight every single case.

Editor’s Note: We talked again after the court case to discuss what had happened and what happens next.

We did most of this interview before your court case. You were in court yesterday. How did it go?

I received a fine of €1,500. I didn’t know that one could be prosecuted for a question regularly covered in history class if it was related to Palestine. But now I know that although Article 5 Paragraph 1 GG offers freedom of speech according to established case law covering many cases, in the case of Palestine, a judge does not have to stick to this.

Are you going to pay the fine?

No, I will not pay anything for now.

What happens now? How can people support you?

We will challenge the verdict. Further we are going to organize a fundraiser soon and would be happy for support. 

I would be very, very motivated if I saw that more people not just accept the judgement but to go further until we reach the Bundesverfassungsgericht [high court] This is what makes me stronger.

Thanks a lot. Free Palestine.

A Look at the Protests in Turkey from Afar 

In response to the arrest of Istanbul’s mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, a wave of protests led by students erupted across Turkey, uniting diverse political groups and challenging Erdoğan’s regime.


02/05/2025

Beyazıt Square, Istanbul University

“They thought we were slaves to a miserable future,” read graffiti widely scrawled alongside mass protests in Turkey following the arrest of Ekrem Imamoğlu, the mayor of Istanbul. Imamoğlu and about one hundred others—mostly municipality officials—faced accusations of corruption and terrorism. These accusations, based solely on the testimony of three secret witnesses, were seen as politically motivated. They came in response to the “City Consensus” formed ahead of last year’s local elections, an effort to win control of key municipalities, especially Istanbul. The Consensus was put together by the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and People’s Equality and Democracy Party (DEM), along with many other groups, including NGOs, unions, and more.

However, people’s response to the arrest was completely unexpected. On the 18th of March, İmamoğlu’s diploma was rescinded due to alleged irregularities in his university transfer when he was a student 35 years ago. Turkish law requires a candidate to hold a university degree, thus barring him from running for the presidency and shocking large segments of society, pushing them into despair. The move was a textbook case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s assault on political rivals through fabricated cases, themselves produced through faulty processes. In this case, the university’s central committee overstepped its authority; only the faculty who awarded the diploma could actually make this decision.

The following day, numerous arrests took place, and while the political parties initially responded with hesitation, students took the lead. Istanbul University’s students, where Imamoğlu had studied, gathered for a protest in front of the institution’s historical building in Beyazıt. Despite heavy police presence, they overcame barricades and marched towards the municipality building, electrifying the rest of the country. Students, and primarily young people, joined the demos in a self-organized manner. News of protests erupting in many major cities soon followed, signaling that this time Erdoğan would face serious resistance against yet another politically motivated legal attack.

Even on the first night, there was something unusual about the protests in Turkey. While the first groups of students were mostly from socialist backgrounds, they quickly became a minority as broader segments of society began to join. The supposedly “apolitical” Gen Z proved their critics wrong. Some protestors came with a nationalist standpoint, with salutes and gestures belonging to the Greywolf movement—a breakaway faction from the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), a partner in Erdoğan’s coalition. Since 2017, the movement has splintered, with different groups either supporting or opposing Erdoğan. Queer activists also joined with a more leftist approach, as a group who suffered immensely from ever-shrinking liberties since 2015, when İstanbul’s Pride parade was banned for the first time. The young “western city Kurds” were present too—a term highlighting the different political perspectives of Kurds born or raised in western cities, often due to the forced migration of their parents from the Kurdish region in the east. Kemalist-liberal voices also made themselves heard, the official political narrative until Erdoğan’s rise to power in 2002, which focused on western-liberal values and a unified identity in the country. This unity often came at the cost of oppression, massacre, and the forced immigration of minority ethnic identities.

All these groups joined the protests not necessarily out of ideological solidarity against an autocrat, but primarily because they were all being consigned to a shared miserable future; a future that shines bright only for the supporters of the oppressor and elite ruling class. This generation, like in most places in the world, grew up in an environment of tightening laws against civil society, educational injustice, and mounting economic hardships. Yet at the same time, through social media, this generation could witness firsthand what their peers in other, more resource-rich countries had. Long overlooked as passive followers rather than a potential driving force, they have demonstrated a politically savvy when the moment has called for it. They forced the oppositional liberal CHP to accept the importance of street protests, whereas under its previous leaders, the party had been wary of such civil disobedience movements, fearing they would alienate the more conservative parts of society from joining the opposition movements. Özgür Özel, the leader of the party, stood by the street protests on the second day of the mass gatherings in front of the Municipality of Istanbul, with the condition that the protestors refrain from violence. Students went even further, demanding that a representative of their own choosing speak each night alongside politicians—a demand the party accepted. With their first speech the following night, the students’ representative called for a mass boycott of the university classes, paving the way for one of the biggest civil disobedience movements the country has ever seen. The individual calls for a student boycott in the universities turned into a nationwide, collective voice. 

Structural problems in Turkey abound. The lack of social or governmental support, diminishing scholarships for students, the growing number of university graduates without a job, corruption in the hiring process for public offices, and the government’s assault on the freedom of universities are only a few of the daily, tangible symptoms of the miserable future that people are asked to accept. The prevalence of these elements forced the students to take action without having to agree on a broader political stance. The heterogeneity of the crowds also made it difficult for the regime to criminalize protests as it used to; it was not only Kurds who are de-facto “terrorists,” not the leftists who are the “instruments of radical foreign intervention,” not the feminists and queers as “the degenerates of alien elements.” Thus, in an environment where falling outside the regime’s narrative is equated with treason and crime, and where demands for liberties are seen as threats, the ruling elite did not know whom to attack this time.

Hunting the Capital beyond the Streets

The lack of media coverage of the protests angered considerable parts of society and ignited the discussions of boycotts. One such example is CNN Türk, which in 2013 infamously aired a documentary on penguins during the height of the Gezi Protests. This time, their preference was a food program demonstrating a künefe recipe. Large chunks of what was once liberal media are now owned by Erdoğan-supporting conglomerates. Erdoğan himself led a boycott campaign in 2008 against the Doğan Media Outlet, whose newspaper widely reported on the corruption charges against Deniz Feneri Derneği (DenizFeneri e.V as known in Germany), which embezzled donations gathered under the promise of helping the poor to set up businesses. Erdoğan, then prime minister, decried the court ruling in Germany as unlawful and targeted the media organs that reported the case as foreign agents. As a result, Doğan Media Group sold the whole media outlet, bowing to the political pressure from Erdoğan, and it became Doğuş Media Group.

Thus, reversing Erdoğan’s earlier strategy and riding on the excitement of the student boycott, Özgür Özel has called for a general boycott of some of these conglomerates. Demirören Group is one of the main targets that took over the Doğan Group and turned every one of their channels and newspapers into a propaganda tool of Erdoğan. Demirören not only owns media outlets, but also runs several other companies that operate in various sectors, from mining to construction to tourism. Another is Doğuş Group, also strong allies of Erdoğan, who run many luxury restaurants and hold the distribution of car brands like Volkswagen, Audi, and Porsche just to name a few. Another media outlet on the list is Turkuvaz Medya, the owner of the internationally known Daily Sabah, along with other newspapers and TV channels, as well as many Turkish franchises of international magazines, such as Vogue, GQ, Esquire, and Cosmopolitan. Another is Albayrak Medya, owned by Berat Albayrak and Serhat Albayrak — the latter being Erdoğan’s son-in-law and a former minister of the economy, whom Erdoğan was forced to dismiss after his disastrous term in office. The list continues with Turkey’s Radio and Television Institution (TRT, Türkiye Radyo Televizyon Kurumu), the state-owned official channel, as well as Anadolu Agency, the state-run news agency. One of the few subjects of the boycott unrelated to the media is ETS Tur, a traveling agency owned by the Minister for Transportation, Mehmet Nuri Ersoy. Another is D&R, the biggest bookshop chain owned by Demirören. 

For many, the most surprising target on the list was a coffee chain. The students’ condition for supporting the boycott list proposed by the CHP was that several companies of their choosing also be included. Upon the agreement, EspressoLab was announced as a boycotted brand. The students’ reason for EspressoLab’s inclusion in the ban was its takeover of university canteens, where before, they could previously purchase coffee and sandwiches for much cheaper prices. When you visit any city in Turkey today, it is impossible not to come across an EspressoLab branch. Operating as a franchise, the chain has expanded rapidly beyond Turkey into many Gulf and North African countries, and even opened a branch in Nürnberg, Germany—134 new locations in just a year and a half. Initially, the company expressed confusion about their place on the boycott list. However, when a photo of the owner with Erdoğan resurfaced, and Justice and Development Party (AKP) MPs began flocking to EspressoLab after Iftar to publicly show support, their claims of political neutrality quickly collapsed. It also signaled the regime’s anxiety over a boycott of the brand. A large segment of society is now accused of treason based solely on their consumption habits. Criminal complaints have been filed against many who shared calls for boycott on social media—including actors, journalists, and students—and some have even been taken into custody through house raids. The criminalization of the boycott and its supporters reveals the state and pro-government companies’ fear of collective organization against them.

When asked about how the list was decided, Özel replied that many were media outlets that did not cover the nationwide protests. Alternatively, many are brands that make their profits mainly from the CHP’s electorate and other opposition supporters, making them ideal targets for a boycott campaign that could resonate with their customers. As a social democratic, Kemalist party, the CHP’s voters are mostly urban middle- and upper-middle-class citizens, and thus they use travel agencies, bookshops, media outlets, and expensive cars more than the more rural AKP voters. This once again revealed the neoliberal financial web of the Erdoğan regime. Once the boycott gained momentum and more information about brand ownership circulated on social media, people realized that the state and private capital had become one, feeding off each other.

Both Özel’s argument—that these companies profit from the CHP’s voter base—and Erdoğan’s fear of a boycott proved to be well-founded. DBL Entertainment’s case quickly turned into an international affair. The owner of the company wrote that, “the boycotters are enemies of the capital and committing treason.” The backlash was quick and organized. People called for a boycott of the company’s events and reached out to names like Trevor Noah, Ane Brun, and Muse to cancel their events, all of whom followed the demands. The company owner was forced to apologize, but it was already too late for his international reputation: DBL announced they would withdraw from all future events they were organizing and soon announce which company would take over. He later said that he regrets his initial post on social media that led to the boycott, which cost him millions of dollars.

Another point of the boycott was to “use our power that comes from consumption.” The traditional argument for mass strikes was and still is about using the power of (withdrawing) labour. With that being said, the economist Öner Günçavdı explained that the power of consumption is much stronger in today’s Turkey, where the service sector has outgrown the industry sector. Therefore, breaking the consumption chain is much easier and more effective than the production chain. Moreover, it can attract more support, as it is about rejecting something rather than actively engaging in it. Given the criminalization of any form of public unrest over the last 10 years, some people might be afraid to go into the streets or find it difficult to do so consistently, either for political or physical reasons, as is the case with many pensioners. Simply refraining from buying certain things or buying nothing at all, as was the case on the 2nd of April’s general day of boycott for not spending anything, is something much easier to get behind. 

It also changed people’s daily habits; the economic crisis made people addicted to shopping. Saving money does not make sense because of the high inflation. So, whenever they can afford, they buy new things with the thought that they might not be able to in a few months. Hence, credit card debts are through the roof. Now people have found a reason not to spend money as an act of resistance.

What’s Next? 

With Eid approaching at the height of the demonstrations, Erdoğan’s announcement that the holidays would be extended from two days to nine by combining two weekends altered the course of the demonstrations. CHP organized one last big meeting at Maltepe in Istanbul, with 2.2 million people attending on March 29th. As the holiday officially ended on April 7th, they decided to shift their focus to smaller gatherings in different districts in Istanbul every Wednesday and a mass demonstration in a different city every Saturday.

There are also new fronts to fight, as the state’s response to the protest was, as expected, violent. Intimidation, beatings, teargas, plastic bullets, and torture in custody were commonly reported. At one point, more than 1,000 protestors were under custody, 301 of whom were arrested. Now, the lawyers are dealing with the appeals to the higher courts against the initial charges from prosecutors. The more challenging task is to improve the conditions they are held in. Some students were put in cells in numbers that the rooms cannot accommodate, so they had to sleep on the floor. Because of the pre-existing problem of overcrowded prisons – there are more than 400,000 prisoners in the country – some were sent to prisons in other cities, far away from any support system they might get through their lawyers and families. More than 700 accounts on social media were blocked, most of which belong to journalists, feminist/queer, and leftist groups. Conversations around how to use social media differently and alternative ways of communication are taking place. 

Streets are still busy though. The students’ main focus shifted towards continuing to build solidarity between different universities and gathering support for the arrested students. They had a mass gathering in the Kadıköy district of Istanbul on April 9th, with some famous musicians playing during the event in solidarity. On April 10th, 104 of them were released from the prisons where they had been kept since their arrests. However, just days after, prosecutors asked for three years of prison and a political ban for 139 of the cases out of over a thousand, and trials will begin by the end of the month. One of the students’ objectives is to raise awareness of the systematic practice of sexual assaults and torture by the police, especially experienced by young women. 

While the boycott on April 2nd witnessed shuttered shop windows and empty shopping malls, people did not abandon the streets. Some cafes stayed open to serve free tea and coffee, home-cooked meals were shared, and public forums were organized. Boycott tents were set up in some parks, where activities continue daily. The general boycott was repeated a week later on Wednesday, 9th of April, suggesting once-a-week boycotts may become a regular cadence. Self-organized student groups, feminists, and youth organizations of the opposition parties are coming together in parks and universities to discuss and strategize next moves, as well as how to structure a sustainable boycott movement. Layered discussions are being held, such as how to build a feminist boycott and how the lower-income population could participate, given that the gap between poverty and starvation is narrower than ever before.

On April 11th, the ongoing university movement spread to high schools as well. The suspension of opposition-aligned teachers from more than 30 well-established high schools in many cities, especially in Istanbul, and their replacement with new administrators and teachers sparked a sharp reaction. Sit-ins and class boycotts were organized in numerous high schools.

With the mass protests being replaced by smaller and more district-based meetings, the most circulated posts on social media have become about how much time is needed for a boycott or mass protests to be successful. Everyone reminds each other that this will be a marathon, rather than a sprint. Erdoğan will resist leaving his position, but the streets are taken back by protestors after almost 10 years of heavy surveillance. Regained public space and the newly discovered power of boycotts motivate people and make them hopeful. Journalist Ruşen Çakır, who runs the independent platform Medyascope, commented that Turkey was one of the first countries to slide into autocracy at the end of the first decade of this century. They resolutely added that there is no reason why it shouldn’t be the first to overthrow an autocrat too.

United Against Fascism!

Immigrant organizing, uniting leftists and collective action in Berlin

“We are like quinoa grains. Alone, the wind disperses us. But united in the same pot, the wind cannot move us. It will shake us, but it will not topple us.

Dolores Cacuango (Indigenous Ecuadorian leader)

1. Another First of May: the rich even richer, the extreme right, and the world on fire

We live in dark times. Every day we receive news that seems straight out of a dystopian future, but which describes our current reality. As food prices rise, rents skyrocket, and wages stagnate, ever more images of war, genocide, and environmental catastrophes flood our screens. The global situation is complex and, at the same time, alarmingly clear in one respect: the wealthiest 1% of the population seizes every opportunity to get even richer by exploiting and destroying people and nature.

Since the pandemic, the wealth of billionaires and global inequality continue to rise. On average, in 2024, each billionaire’s fortune grew by $2 million a day. The ten richest men increased their wealth by $100 million a day, while 50% of the world’s population lives on less than $5 a day. It’s a scandal that the gap between those of us who toil away the day, working precariously, and those who steal our jobs is widening every day!

We are witnessing and experiencing the accelerated reconfigurations of neoliberal capitalism that manifest themselves as authoritarian shock therapy. Less and less money for bread and more and more money for weapons! The ruthless greed of those at the top, seeking to secure the profit rate, doesn’t fear death, but rather the death of those bodies and territories considered disposable: the Palestinian people, migrants drowning in the Mediterranean, forests on fire…

The oligarchy, in Latin America and elsewhere, has never needed to be in government to exercise its dominance, as it possesses not only the means of production but also the hegemonic media and the increasingly sophisticated tools of financialized capitalism. However, today, big business, within its national-global framework, is increasingly assuming direct political control, as evidenced by the explicit alliance between corporations and far-right politicians.

Trump’s inauguration party at the end of January 2025 left us with a bitter glimpse of the authoritarian international scene. While Silicon Valley’s “Trump bros” championed the xenophobic leader, the anarcho-capitalist Javier Milei and the far-right drug trafficker-president Daniel Noboa, along with their respective “first ladies,” posted selfies on Instagram to boast about their front-row seats. A month later, at the Conservative Policy Action Conference (CPAC), to the cheers and jubilation of the far-right audience, Milei offered Elon Musk his infamous chainsaw “to dismantle the state bureaucracy.” These alliances, clear examples of neoliberal austerity and authoritarian radicalization, symbolize the new capitalist ways of carrying out exploitation and repackaging its aesthetics.

Worldwide, in imperial centers as well as the peripheries and resistance zones of the South, authoritarian neoliberal governments are dismantling social systems and attacking historic gains of popular movements. The destruction of the state as the guarantor of social security is in full swing everywhere. Argentina under Milei is up in arms against ruthless cuts to education, healthcare, gender equality policies, and much more. Enforcing this austerity, the repressive forces of the state even brutally beat retirees in the streets. In Ecuador, which is approaching almost a decade of authoritarian neoliberal regimes, the belated unity of the left was unfortunately not enough to defeat the fascism that fraudulently imposed itself at the polls in April 2025. If Argentina is a test laboratory for repressive neoliberalism, Ecuador is a sacrifice zone, where the narco-right murders Afro-Ecuadorian children to fill their pockets with bloody dollars. In memory of Josué, Ismael, Saúl, and Steven, our struggle continues!

Noboa’s banana shipments arrive with cocaine at raves in a Europe that also bets more on death than life. In Germany in particular, the “grand coalition” between the Christian “democrats” (CDU/CSU) and the authoritarian “social democrats” (SPD) did not hesitate to cut social benefits from childcare infrastructure to cultural projects. The icing on the cake has been their openly xenophobic policy, not only restricting immigrant rights but also advocating for our mass deportation. Given this situation, it does not surprise us at all that the neo-Nazi AfD party has established itself as the second-largest political force nationwide in the February 2025 elections. There is no need for the AfD in the grand new-old coalition between the CDU and SPD, because these parties are only democratic in name. We denounce this loud and clear: their government plan enhances the far-right attack against us, the immigrants, and those at the bottom!

Thus, the authoritarian state grows under the guise of a supposed democracy. The Europe of the upper echelons is re-arming to the teeth to radicalize this phase of capitalist accumulation, focusing industrial reconversion on the manufacture and export of sophisticated weapons. Wars abroad and an iron fist within! The German state has never de-Nazified itself and has always been repressive. However, since its exacerbated participation in profiting from the genocide in Palestine, it has become even more repressive, and its police force, even more savage. And fundamental rights, from the right of assembly to free expression? Trampled. We will never forget that they want to prohibit us even from mourning. Fascist boots trampled on the candles of the vigils on Sonnenallee when we mourned so many dead in that bloody autumn of 2023. This escalation of violence affects a society that, due to the rising cost of living and growing uncertainty, is increasingly pressured and outraged. In Germany and around the world, precariousness is spreading. The working class and increasingly the impoverished middle class are having to cut back on basic needs like food and clothing to make ends meet.

This harsh reality is no coincidence. It’s the result of a system that concentrates wealth at the top and generates poverty at the bottom. It’s the global breeding ground for the rise of far-right movements with fascist practices or aspirations.

2. Fascism is not to be debated, but fought? But, it is people who vote for the fascist, right?

Without a doubt, we are experiencing a period of right-wing political proposals globally. From the highest echelons of power, the authoritarian solution to the crisis is being consolidated, and parties of all stripes, seeking to maintain their good ties with these elites and appeal to their lost bases, interpret their political and media role by simply saying that society has “turned right.” A form of fatal, self-fulfilling prophecy.

Despite the widespread belief that fascism reigns among the popular sectors, it is essential to differentiate between right-wing parties and the people who vote for them today. In most cases, those who vote for or begin flirting with the right do so not necessarily because they are ideologically convinced, but rather as a response to the capitalist context of uncertainty, instability, and fear, as described previously.

We are facing a complex challenge. Although people often diagnose social problems the same way we do (“There are no decent jobs, my children can’t access quality public education, I’m afraid to go out, etc.”), it’s in the interpretation of who is to blame and what the solution to the crisis would be that the fascist right is winning the battle. According to Milei, the blame lies with “the shitty leftists,” according to Noboa, with the “drug-trafficking leftists,” according to the AfD and the grand coalition, with us immigrants.

The fascists are Milei, Noboa, and the AfD, but we on the left are doing ourselves no favors if we label as fascists the delivery driver who can’t make ends meet in a suburban neighborhood of Buenos Aires, the mother worried about her children in Guayaquil, or the worker in Brandenburg who needs to understand why his wallet is emptying even as the calluses on his hands grow. Our historic task is to re-interpellate these sectors, creating collective spaces where we can understand the many faces of the capitalist crisis and once again point the finger not at each other, but at the true culprits: the exploiters up high. Only by proposing and jointly building a social project that resolves our social problems and motivates the majority to fight for a dignified life can we avoid the real danger of a fascistization of society as a whole.

Classical fascism in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s emerged at a time of capitalist crisis as a way out of the liberal institutional engineering resulting from war, inflation, and falling productivity. It also emerged as a response to the rise of communist parties. This gained it the support of politicians, businessmen, and religious figures around the world. Thus, fascism developed as the elites’ emergency brake to prevent the popular sectors from seizing their privileges. Despite what Trump and Milei crudely shout, fascism and communism are not the same. At the same time, fascist regimes, proposing a new way of organizing society, the total state, and the economy, have managed to permeate society as a mass street movement. Let us recall the Voluntary Militia for National Security in Italy, better known as the Blackshirts.

The global far right is heterogeneous, and its fascist aspirations and practices vary. While some actors seek to revisit a supposedly glorious past by applying the same neoliberal recipes and using the same old hate speech, we are increasingly confronted with sophisticated expressions that are being articulated in areas of life they previously didn’t reach, such as youth movements and cultural spaces. We’re not just talking about governments or political parties, but about grassroots movements and TikTok influencers. Far beyond the electoral sphere, there is also a danger of social fascism in everyday life that we must avoid at all costs. We can start by separating the wheat from the chaff. Of course, we are fighting the leadership of the global far right parties. However, with knowledge that this isn’t always possible in terms of security, we must now more than ever talk to the precarious people who are voting for the right.

What we are experiencing is a profound crisis of capitalism and the rise of authoritarian conservative projects that seek to justify neoliberal austerity. Like any political process, this one is not totalitarian, but rather an evolution of political and class struggles. It will depend on us to prevent this slide toward terror from increasing, making fascism the only way out. It will depend on whether we organize, fight, and build an alternative to capitalism or not.

For immigrant communities, creating solidarity networks to help us with everyday problems is a daily routine. Like the work of small ants, we politicize these needs to raise our collective voice in the face of injustice and to propose self-organized solutions and alternatives for society. This is why we are excited by the popular leftist movements in Germany that are breaking out of their bubble and increasingly investing in grassroots work. This is the way forward. For example, the door-to-door campaign by comrade Ferat, from Die Linke in Neukölln, even managed to motivate young people to come from other cities to support us. At the Bloque Latinoamericano, we know that when you are passionate about a horizon of social transformation, camaraderie and collective construction become a profound part of your life. We invite comrades from leftist movements and parties in Germany to continue renewing their organizational strategies and to engage more with immigrant leftists. No one can save themselves alone, which is why we need to create broad alliances, from the left and from below, to truly build collective power/Gegenmacht.

3. Who is the number one enemy of the German state? It starts with “immi” and ends with “grants”

Migration to Europe is not a random phenomenon; it is a direct consequence of Europe’s plundering foreign and economic policies. Environmental destruction, military interventions, “free” trade agreements, and globally exploitative relations force people to leave their countries and their families. By demonizing immigrants, right-wing and “centrist” parties in Europe attack us. They foster racism and divide society, blaming us for their fate and hiding the true reasons for the capitalist crisis we are experiencing. They say we are to blame. That migrants steal their jobs, that we import antisemitism, that we fail to integrate, that we must “re-migrate”… This is the right’s strategy to divide the German and immigrant working classes.

However, it’s clear: Germany and other European countries need migrants as cheap labor, disempowered and silent. The entire system of immigration laws—whether in asylum procedures, “cultural” au-pair programs, or work visas—is designed to force immigrants to accept precarious jobs and threats. No matter how poorly paid or how terrible the conditions, the important thing is that we work and keep the German economy running. Furthermore, we should be grateful and bow our heads; grateful because things would be worse for us back home. First they expel us from our territories, then they exploit us here. And on top of that, they want us to smile. Our cuisine and our dances — they like that. But when our voices join together to demand our rights and our dignified place in a society we also built, that’s when we become undesirable.

Structurally, migrant workers are employed in precarious and non-unionized sectors. It is primarily feminized bodies, women, and LGBTQIA+ individuals who bear the brunt of flexible and covert exploitation. Immigrants are overrepresented in areas such as logistics, caregiving, agriculture, and gastronomy, often under the “Amazon model,” which entails maximum exploitation with minimal social and labor security. In these sectors, attempts at union organizing are not only ignored but actively combated, through practices of defamation and criminalization, such as union busting in the cases of Tesla or Gorillas/Getir.

Structural exclusion has many causes: lack of access to affordable housing, bureaucratic obstacles such as the vicious circle of the Anmeldung process, language barriers, lack of awareness of labor rights, temporary residence permits, extreme working hours, and immigration legislation that can lead to deportation at any moment. However, unions, which should be a tool for the working classes, have not implemented a consistent policy to address migrant workers, focusing only on higher-income sectors. Both time and the far-right are advancing, but unfortunately, political and union interest in representing this large and growing segment of the working class in Germany is not.

It’s critical that we understand that this reality doesn’t only affect immigrants. If companies can constantly operate under the threat of bringing in cheaper workers from abroad, everyone’s wages will decline!

In the media and in political debates, especially around elections, we observe a growing and dangerous trend that directly attacks us: from the so-called “center” to the far right, there is a consensus to present migration as the cradle of all evil. The leadership of the AfD, CDU/CSU, and SPD parties and their spokespersons in academia and culture are radicalizing anti-immigrant sentiment, turning us into scapegoats for economic insecurity, social tensions, and political crises. What they seek with this is to divide workers and direct hatred toward the most exploited sectors. As long as we all look down and fight among ourselves, those at the top will continue to rejoice and profit from their businesses.

We make a resounding call: Anyone who truly wants to fight for better living conditions in this country must join our struggle to improve the living conditions of immigrants! This is the only possible way for all wage earners, regardless of their origin or passport, to live a dignified life.

The precarization of the labor market goes hand-in-hand with the escalating repression exercised by the supposed reason of state, the German national security doctrine. The escalation of the criminalization of popular and anti-colonial struggles in Germany has reached alarming levels. Deportations of refugees from Afghanistan and Syria have been commonplace for years. Those of us who come from territories like Abya Yala carry the historical radar in our bodies to understand the cruelty with which empires decide which bodies have the right to move freely around the world and which, the darkest, are always racially profiled, expelled, and considered disposable.

Since the genocide in Palestine entered its deadliest phase in 2023, immigrant communities, particularly the Palestinian and anti-Zionist Jewish communities, and all of us who stand in solidarity with them, have been repressed, criminalized, and intimidated. The current case of the threat of deportation against the four activists (European and American) in Berlin marks an authoritarian advance, not because previous cases are less relevant, but because it sets a precedent that the rights of even the citizens of countries considered allies of the North will no longer be respected. We are facing a cruel experiment by the fascist state that seeks to test our limits: how far can repression go without encountering social resistance?

The authoritarian monster is effective. The neoliberal arm takes away our bread and our roof, while the repressive boot kicks us far. The exploitation/criminalization that today affects migrants, left-wing activists, and the Germans in solidarity who extend a hand to us in the face of injustice is the testing ground for the most fascist politics of tomorrow. If the authoritarian state succeeds in undermining the basic democratic rights of people in solidarity with Palestine now, many other sectors with different demands will be hit hard tomorrow, perhaps without even realizing when the debacle began… The technologies of surveillance and death used today at borders and against refugees will tomorrow affect the whole of society: activists, strikers, artists, intellectuals, organized civil society, and all those who dare to aspire to a dignified life.

Immigrants today are being stigmatized as a threat to democracy and “German culture,” and therefore, as the state’s number one enemy. In the face of this onslaught, it is more important than ever that all sectors of the popular movement unite and form alliances of all kinds to tell fascism: not one inch more!

4. What can be done?

In a multifaceted crisis like the current one, an abyss opens before us: an abyss called fascism. But every crisis is also a moment of rupture, a space for transformation. Amid fear and uncertainty, there is the possibility of dreaming of alternatives and putting them into practice collectively. As the Bloque Latinoamericano, we do grassroots work with the Latinx community in Berlin and solidarity work with our territories in Abya Yala/Nuestra América every day. In these dark times, we are committed more than ever to continuing to sow political community so that we can not only resist all the attacks of the right wing from within our organizational and social structures, but also build the socialist world we dream of.

On this May 1st, 2025, we reclaim the historic struggle of workers of all ages and latitudes and join this day with our collective calls and demands to confront a turbulent world:

  • It is necessary to build a broad space for dialogue between the left, both within and outside of institutional and electoral politics. The left must be present in the streets, workplaces, cultural spaces, and parliaments. Political change only emerges from this intertwined foundation.
  • Unions must once again become political and combative actors. Their central role in social transformation can no longer be ignored. They must fight for social rights, for the political participation of migrants, and for climate justice. They must also open themselves to new alliances with social movements, with migrant communities, with all those who otherwise lack an institutionalized voice. Unions must open themselves up to and seek out immigrant workers, not just by giving them quota space, but by fighting alongside them.
  • The coordination of social movements (migrant, feminist, anti-racist) and unions within a left-wing party like Die Linke is fundamental. Our social struggles must be channeled into political proposals with tangible impact. This is only possible through bonds of trust and real alliances, not symbolic politics.
  • The migrant perspective must be understood as a transformative force—not as a marginal or decorative issue, but as the center of a new left project for society as a whole. Bloque Latinoamericano in Berlin is a living example of this collective voice. The political participation of immigrants must become a central task of the left in Germany and elsewhere.
  • Within these spaces of articulation between society, movements, and parties, we need to continue investing in transformative political education and innovate our strategies of visibility and presence—not only to overcome passivity, but also to open up new perspectives for action. It’s not enough to criticize; we must make the alternatives we desire and build visibly and viably.
  • International anti-fascist networks are essential. Left-wing movements must coordinate globally and strengthen each other. The German left can and must be part of this global exchange.

After decades of neoliberal individualization, the greatest challenge of our generation is to organize people who do not yet perceive themselves as part of a collective fabric, but who suffer similar hardships and fight similar battles. It is time to unite, far beyond borders. We must identify our common struggles and wage them together, with love, strength, and joy. What we need is a broad and united alliance: of immigrants from all over the world, of racialized Germans and white Germans in solidarity, of unemployed and working people, of salaried employees, the self-employed, and the precariously employed.

This May 1st, we take to the streets of Neukölln as a migrant bloc: against fascism, war, and poverty wages! We fight for a world where it’s not the richest 1% who decide our lives. A world where we, those at the bottom, collectively shape the just and democratic society we desire and deserve. Even if they try to expel us or divide us, we will remain here, sustaining this country with our work and our dreams, and uniting more than ever to create collective power.

The night is dark, but we have always been guided like stars by the magic words of our ancestors, our leaders, our families, and our comrades in struggle. No matter how great the enemy, how powerful their weapons, or how weak our forces seem, we will continue to build community, fighting and dreaming because this is what our people and our history have taught us. Side by side, we will continue paving the way for hope, until the sky turns red. Long live the migrant workers, long live all those who struggle!

This article first appeared in Spanish on the Bloque Latinoamericano website. Translation: Tigris Vici. Reproduced with permission.