The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

“If we hadn’t been there, they all would have died, and nobody would have even known”

Interview with photographer Lucas Maier, about his exhibition “People don’t let People drown”


20/09/2025

Hi, Lucas. Thanks for talking to us. Could you just briefly introduce yourself?

I’m Lucas Maier. I’m 32 years old. I’m based in Berlin, and I work as a journalist.

And at the moment, you’ve got an exhibition at Regenbogen Cafe.

Yes, I do. It’s about Sea Punk 1, which is a sea rescue vessel in the Mediterranean. I was with the crew in January this year.

How did you get involved with the Sea Punk 1?

I wrote them a message because I had some free time. I was taking some months off work, and I asked them if it’s possible to help them with their media.

Let’s talk about the subjects of your photographs – the refugees crossing the Mediterranean. There’s been a lot of media discussion of refugees being a problem, a burden, or people coming here trying to disrupt our country. Who are the people and why are they on the little boat in the middle of the Mediterranean?

It’s not one kind of people. It’s super diverse. I think the youngest person I’ve seen was younger than one year, the oldest was most probably over 80. They were also really mixed between women and men.

What they have in common is that they live in shitty situations, and want to have a better life, a free life. If they come from certain countries, they have no other option than to go over the Mediterranean with a fucking rubber boat or something. It’s the only choice they have.

A lot of the people in your photos were coming from Libya. How did they get to Libya in the first place?

Super different. Some told us that they walked there from African countries where there is a land connection. Others were, for example, from Pakistan. A lot of people also go to Tunisia nowadays because it’s less dangerous, with fewer chances of being thrown into prison.

Once they’re finally on the Mediterranean, what are the problems that they encounter there?

There are a lot of different problems. First of all, they have no captain on the boat. It’s just random people who are forced to drive. If you don’t know how to drive a boat in the middle of a big ocean, it’s not the best situation. You have no navigation system at all, because mobile phones do not work out at sea, and most of them are in a plastic case, so you can’t use them.

They’re left to navigate using the sun and the stars. And this is super dangerous, because it can extend your journey by days or weeks, and it is high likely that you would run out of gasoline. If that does happen, you have no power to fight the waves anymore, which makes it highly likely that your boat will capsize. And if the waves get too high, these unseaworthy boats will just capsize.

Then you have double decker boats, where people are trapped inside, and some of them die because there’s not enough oxygen, or due to fumes from the motors. Some get fuel burns because when you mix sea water with gasoline it becomes highly toxic, and results in really bad burns.

Then they reach Europe. I guess, theoretically they could land in different countries. Is there a difference between the way they’re treated in each country?

I mostly encountered people going to Italy and Malta. I think it depends a lot on whether you’re out in the Mediterranean, and if you’re able to leave the Libyan SAR Zone. If the Libyans pull you back, you have to go through the fucked up situation from the beginning again – and encounter even worse hardships.

Italy has, for example, the Piantedosi decree from the fascist Meloni, which overrules international sea law and says that they can decide where you should bring people saved by sea rescue. Back in the day, it was normal to go to the next port, because it makes sense to go to the next safe place. But nowadays, it takes days to bring people onshore, with legislation instated just to block the NGOs from what they are doing.

Speaking of NGO, which NGOs were you working with?

Sea Punks is a smaller NGO with a smaller vessel, compared to Sea Watch or Ocean Viking. I think the boat is a total 32 meters, and can carry up to 14 crew members and can take up to around 40 people at maximum capacity.

The boat is mostly made for accommodation or assisting situations. Because it’s so small, it’s not that easy to carry people. So if it encounters a boat which is not sea worthy, people on the Sea Punk can speak to them and give them proper life jackets. And if a boat runs out of gasoline, they organize help from Italy or Malta so that the boat doesn’t capsize and get to Charlie Papa.

Are they able to do this without being impeded by the Italian or Maltese governments?

Yes. You need to have a lot of law stuff in mind and in focus. That’s why you also get trained at the beginning. Every step is done legally, 100% correctly. Until now, there have been no bigger problems with the state. There has been no detention yet. Let’s see what the future brings.

Let’s move onto your work as a photographer. What difference do you think an exhibition like this can make?

I think it can bring the situation to the people. Especially in Central Europe, it’s far, far away – not only in distance, but also in people’s mindset. Most people here can’t imagine how it is to stay for days on such a boat and nearly die.

For the people who died while I was there, it’s the only way to show that they died and that this is happening. If we hadn’t been there, they all would have died, and nobody would have even known. It’s such a huge sea, and if you don’t find the boat, it’s just gone.

The exhibition currently is in the Regenbogen Café, where most people are at least aware of refugees and are generally on their side. How can you get across to a wider audience of people who are either not aware of refugees or are aware and don’t want them?

This is the first time I showed this exhibition, and it’s a nice environment to have it in. But of course, in the future, I also want to go to places which are more conservative, encounter people without an explicitly leftist mindset. Maybe at a church or similar. I want it to lead to discussions which are outside the box.

Do you think you’ve got hope of getting venues like this?

Actually, I know some people in person. After a quick chat with them, I think it could be managed. It’s not that hard for me to find other places.

If someone goes to the exhibition and thinks “This is terrible, I should do something,” what should they do?

First of all, they should speak about it. In Germany, we have a really strong rise of the right wing. It is becoming more normal in society to say: “It’s ok that they are dying. It’s just refugees.” And that’s not okay.

Of course, it’s always good to support NGOs with money or with volunteer work if you can. Sometimes it just takes little steps to change the world a little bit more.

What about the people who say: “They’re having a bad time, but Germans are having a bad time as well. Germans are losing the jobs. Germans are poor.” Why should people worry about refugees?

Firstly, there’s a difference between losing your job and losing your life. We had one family who lost all three of their children in one day. Losing your job is nothing compared to that. I think it says a lot about white privilege to think that way.

If you have faced situations like that, it can help you deal with your own problems at home, because you come to appreciate that there are people who have a much harder life than you and have problems that threaten their survival. Of course, losing a job is not the best situation, but it’s also not the worst.

Part of what you’re doing is talking to people with terrible experiences. Of course, it’s worse for them than it is for you. But how do you sustain yourself in terms of just viewing all this misery?

Before I got there, I prepared for the worst case scenarios – if it comes to difficult situations, I always prepare like that. It helped me a lot. Beside that, it was good to have the support of the crew. We helped each other, and talked to each other. We also had two days of psychological support at the end.

How does someone become a crew member for something like this?

There is a form on the website. There are different positions on board. For some, you need to be sea worthy with certificates. For others, you don’t. As a media person, I just wrote a message to them and said: “Here’s my CV. You can check if it fits what you need.” Then they called me back and invited me.

The vessel is not always at sea. There is a lot of time spent in port. And people can help with maintaining the boat. A large part of the work is maintaining the boat so that it’s still seaworthy.

What are your next plans? How can you make your photos available to a wider audience?

My next step is to put the exhibition online. I got a lot of messages from people saying that they’d like to see the photos but it’s not possible for them to come to Berlin.

Do you have a chance of showing in other cities?

Yeah. I’m in talks with one place in Potsdam, and maybe also in my home town in Bavaria.

One last question for the Berliners. How long is the exhibition going on? Where can they see it? And when?

It’s at the Regenbogen Café, next to the Regenbogenfabrik in Kreuzberg. It is on until the last weekend of September, during the normal opening hours, which are on their website.

If people want to support you personally, how can they contact you?

My contact is written at the exhibition, so they can just contact me. But at the moment, I don’t need that much support. At the moment, people should really be supporting the people who are drowning in the Mediterranean.

All photos: Lucas Maier. These are just part of the exhibition which you can see until September 27th in the Regebogenfabrik Café, Lausitzerstraße 22a, The café is open on Tuesdays from 12:00 – 18:00, and Wednesday and Fridays from 15:00 – 22:00

Red Flag: Fake news about fake Jews from a German minister

In his weekly column, Nathaniel Flakin looks at supposed anti-Jewish boycotts—and actual boycotts


19/09/2025

Techno club About Blank in Berlin, Germany

“It’s a little bit like in the 1930s,” declared Wolfram Weimer on a podcast. Weimer is a far-right culture warrior with a side hustle as Germany’s state secretary for culture. Now, many people see frightening parallels to the 1930s, with a far-right party riding the crest of a xenophobic wave. But Weimer, an ideological forerunner of Germany’s Rechtsruck, or shift to the right, was referring to something completely different. 

“We have a situation where Jews in Germany—especially those who are…in the cultural sector—are afraid.” He mentioned Jewish DJs who couldn’t get gigs. “Why? Because you’re Jewish. That is pure antisemitism, and they experience this all the time.”

Is this true? Are Jewish DJs getting cancelled? Weimer has made this claim before—and as the left-wing newspaper nd showed in an investigation, he could not name a single Jewish artist who has faced a boycott.

Is This True?

I reached out to Weimer’s office to ask which specific DJs he was referring to. A speaker replied that they do not keep statistics, but there are “numerous reports.” They suggested I reach out to the Israeli ambassador, with whom Weimer recently met.

This is already a bit confusing: Does Ron Prosor represent Jewish DJs? Isn’t conflating Israel and Jewish people a clear case of antisemitism according to the IHRA definition?

I asked them to send me a few of these “numerous reports,” and they sent the same bizarre examples they had used in the past, such as the call to boycott the club ://about blank—a German, non-Jewish institution—for its pro-genocide stance. (It’s worth noting that ://about blank announced an event on antisemitism with zero Jewish speakers, and proceeded to deny Jewish activists entry.)

In other words, it appears the state minister has zero examples of the very specific claims he has been making. There are boycotts related to Israel’s genocide—but “because you are Jewish” seems to be Weimer’s invention.

The Munich Philharmonic Orchestra was disinvited from a Belgian music festival because of the Israeli conductor Lahav Shani. But besides the fact that Shani does not appear to be a DJ, this decision was not because he is Jewish, but rather because he supports the Israeli army while it carries out a genocide. As festival organizers wrote: “We are unable to provide sufficient clarity about his attitude to the genocidal regime.” 

The Munich Philharmonic should be familiar with this: In 2022, they fired their Russian conductor Valery Gergiev for not distancing himself from Russia’s war in Ukraine. Was that an example of anti-Russian or anti-Slavic racism? Or was it a political decision?

As far as I can tell, Weimer’s whole story appears to be what Germans call a Zeitungsente or “newspaper duck,” otherwise known as fake news. Weimer’s speaker emphasized that he finds this made-up story “worrying and completely unacceptable.”

Actual Cancellations

There have been numerous, well-reported cancellations of Jewish artists and intellectuals in Germany. In every case, it has not been because they are Jewish, but rather because they have publicly criticized Israel’s genocide in Gaza and Germany’s support for it. Nancy Fraser was fired by a German university; Candice Breitz had an art show cancelled; Masha Gessen had a ceremony for a literary prize scrapped; Yuval Carraso was beaten up by police. The list could go on and on.

In the podcast, Weimer took a moment to attack yet another Jewish leftist, and accused Karl Marx of antisemitism—deeply strange coming from an admirer of proto-Nazi philosopher Oswald Spengler’s theories of European decline. German nationalists like to imagine Jews as a homogenous group with centralized leadership—that’s why Weimer treats Prosor as the representative of the Jewish people. If all Jews are part of a Zionist collective, then opposing Zionism must be antisemitic.

At the Emmys last Sunday, the culture official could have seen an example of the diversity of views in the Jewish community when the actress Hannah Einbinder called out “Free Palestine!” She later explained:

“I feel like it is my obligation as a Jewish person to distinguish Jews from the State of Israel, because our religion and our culture is such an important and long standing institution that is really separate to this sort of ethno-nationalist state.”

As Haaretz put it, Einbinder is the “voice of a generation” of Jewish people who are breaking with Zionism (and thus joining a long tradition of Jewish anti-Zionism). In Germany, she would face a government boycott—all in the name of “fighting antisemitism,” of course.

I am still waiting to hear back from Weimer whether the boycotts against leftist Jews are “worrying and completely unacceptable.”

Springer’s Antisemitism 

Before joining the government, Weimer had a long career as a journalist at right-wing publications, including those of the Axel Springer Company. The podcast in question was hosted by Paul Ronzheimer of BILD, a Springer tabloid. What is Springer’s record on antisemitism? 

Axel Springer, before he became the Caesar of West Germany’s yellow journalism, worked as a small cog in Joseph Goebbel’s propaganda machine, and joined the National Socialist Motor Corps. Years after fascism had been defeated, Springer married a daughter of Werner Lorenz, one of the top officials of the SS in charge of ethnic cleansing of Eastern Europe—he just really wanted a war criminal in the family. Springer’s newspapers campaigned in defense of Nazi war criminals like Hans Globke.

Springer’s fanatical support for Zionism is often presented as a repudiation of his earlier Nazi convictions. In truth, however, the SS itself was fascinated by a Jewish movement that shared their goal of making Germany Jew-free. Springer was continuing a long tradition of antisemitic support for Zionism and Israel—the “philosemite” wanted Jews to be far away.

The German Right has long associated Jews with the universalist and internationalist ideas they despise. The attempts to erase and suppress all non-Zionist and anti-Zionist Jewish voices are nothing new. Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, and Primo Levi all faced persecution—and they would not be allowed to speak at German universities today due to their views on Israel. But now, the German government frames this as “fighting antisemitism” and protecting non-existent Jewish DJs.

Red Flag is a weekly opinion column on Berlin politics that Nathaniel has been writing since 2020. After moving through different homes, it now appears at The Left Berlin.

Friends of the Filipino People in Struggle

Solidarity organization supporting the National Democratic people’s movement in the Philippines


17/09/2025

Friends of the Filipino in Struggle (FFPS) is an international network building support for the Philippine revolution and the National Democratic Front of the Philippines’s (NDFP) 12-point program for a just and lasting peace. Through education, mobilization, and other forms of concrete solidarity, FFPS works to amplify the voices of the Filipino masses, share information about their struggles, and strengthen anti-imperialist solidarity with the Philippine revolution.

As part of its main campaign FFPS tries to gather support for the NDFP and promote the Philippine revolutionary struggle. It is important to amplify the program of the Philippine revolution, learn from its inspiring practice and give concrete support where we can.

Under the current US-backed Marcos regime, the Philippine government wages a brutal counterinsurgency under the false banner of “peace.” Behind this façade lies an agenda of violent suppression, corruption, and deeper dependence on U.S. imperial interests.

FFPS campaigns internationally to expose this sham and to highlight that it is the NDFP—not the Marcos government—that offers a real path to peace. Through revolutionary armed struggle, the NDFP lays out a framework for national and social liberation.

In the face of escalating repression and disinformation, FFPS calls on movements worldwide to mobilize in support of the Filipino people’s struggle for liberation.

Day of Solidarity with the Filipino People

On September 20, Migrantifa Berlin, Lotta Basel, and Friends of the Filipino People in Struggle (FFPS) are hosting a day of solidarity with the Filipino people’s fight for national liberation.

In early 2024, an internationalist delegation visited the Philippines, where the Communist Party and its guerrilla force, the New People’s Army (NPA), have been waging a long-standing liberation struggle against the US-backed fascist Philippine government since the late 1960s. The event will feature a documentary exhibition and two presentations: one on solidarity work in Europe, and another reporting on the revolutionary mass movement in the Philippines and its successes on the ground.

For centuries, the Filipino people have faced oppression and exploitation at the hands of foreign powers. However, their fierce resistance against them has persisted for just as long. The Filipino people have the right to fight back against the root problems of Philippine society, namely imperialism, feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism.

The National Democratic Front of the Philippines unites the fighting Filipino masses and represents the revolutionary mass movement. Its 12 point program unites the various classes and sectors of the Philippine society for national liberation, genuine freedom and democracy.

When: Saturday 20 Sept 12-6pm
Where: bUm (Kreuzberg)

Open letter to German media institutions

On Israel’s Deliberate Killing of Palestinian Journalists and the Complicity of German Media

Funeral of Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Aqleh after her assassination in Palestine

(Note: this is the English version of the letter, republished by The Left Berlin with permission. As of 17.9.2025, the original open letter is still accepting signatures.)

We, journalists, media workers, and members of civil society, hold German media institutions fully accountable for their ongoing role in enabling the systematic and deliberate killing of our Palestinian colleagues. 

According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), more journalists have been killed in Gaza than in any armed conflict in recent history. Yesterday alone, on 25th August, Israel killed five more Palestinian journalists in a double strike on Al-Nasser-Hospital, raising the death toll of Palestinian journalists to 273 since 7 October 2023. Yet, most German media outlets continue to respond to these killings by ignoring, discrediting or defaming their colleagues. 

A harrowing example is the recent assassination of Anas Al-Sharif, a 28-year-old award-winning Al Jazeera journalist, who was murdered on August 10, 2025 by an Israeli airstrike, along with five other Palestinian media workers. They were sleeping in a tent clearly marked “press” outside Al-Shifa Hospital. Days before his murder, the CPJ publicly warned that Israel’s smear campaign against Al-Sharif was a precursor to assassination and called for his protection. Most German media outlets ignored these warnings and instead repeated Israel’s unverified claims that portrayed him a “Hamas terrorist.” What’s more, the repetition of these claims served to ignore the murder of the other five media workers by dangerously reinforcing it as acceptable collateral damage.

This is not a single failure of fact-checking. This is systematic. The Israeli military has a well-documented pattern of smearing Palestinian journalists to label them as “lawful military objectives” in order to justify their deliberate targeting. By repeatedly amplifying this propaganda, German media outlets have effectively provided Israel with a license to kill Palestinian journalists with impunity. 

The following headlines, a glimpse of daily Gaza coverage across German media landscape, speak for themselves: 

Süddeutsche Zeitung (11.08.2025): “Jazeera Journalist Killed in Gaza. Israel: Terrorist

Bild (11.08.2025): “Israel Kills Gaza reporter – Journalist or Terrorist?

taz (09.01.2025): “Can Journalists be Terrorists?

Die Welt (10.06.2024): “‘Journalists held Hamas hostages’ – Jazeera denies connection

Tagesschau (05.02.2024): “Qatari broadcast Jazeera – Support for Hamas

To be clear, killing journalists constitutes a serious war crime and justifying it is an act of complicity!

German journalist unions have also played their part. While condemning the recent killing of Anas Al-Sharif, the Deutsche Journalistinnen- und Journalisten-Union (DJU) labeled him a terrorist sympathizer and the Deutsche Journalisten-Verband (DJV) warned a week before about alleged photo manipulations of starving children by Palestinian journalists. Both actions serve to discredit Palestinian journalists and cast doubt on their reporting.

Meanwhile, German media has failed to offer their Palestinian colleagues any visibility and protection routinely provided to international reporters. Most outlets haven’t issued even basic statements of solidarity, ignoring the courage of these journalists who report relentlessly under fire, forced displacement and a deliberate starvation campaign the genocide of their own people.

Even more fundamentally, major media institutions have consistently obscured the historical and political context in their reporting on Gaza and presented that it all began on October 7. This framing erases decades of Israel’s brutal colonization, illegal occupation and systematic oppression of Palestinians, thus reversing victim and aggressor. This is not a coincidence but an expression of the compliance with German state narrative and its declared Staatsräson

A recent example is the outlet taz, which published two articles this month that deny the Nakba—the ethnic cleansing of more than 750,000 Palestinians and the dispossession of their land. One of the articles even went so far to compare these crimes to “Germany’s liberation from fascism in 1945.”

This professional and ethical collapse within media institutions not just dehumanizes Palestinian journalists and contributes to their killing, it betrays the core principle of journalism itself: a commitment to truth, to those risking everything to tell it, and to always question power and state narratives.

We demand that German media institutions

  • stop spreading amply unverified Israeli state propaganda and refrain from using passive language that avoids naming Israel as the perpetrator;
  • stop framing Israel’s crimes against Palestinians as a neutral “conflict” between equal sides and provide the historical and political context;
  • stop dehumanizing Palestinians and instead include their voices, perspectives and lived experiences in their reporting;
  • establish transparent editorial policies detailing how reporting on Gaza is sourced, verified and labeled;
  • collaborate with and employ Palestinian journalists, ensuring they receive credit, visibility and institutional support;
  • publicly defend press freedom in Gaza and demand protection for Palestinian journalists and media workers on the ground;
  • adhere to professional and ethical standards of journalism, including rigorous verification of information and the questioning of power and of Germany’s state narratives on Palestine and Israel;
  • undertake a full political, legal and public reckoning of their role in enabling and legitimizing Israel’s crimes against Palestinians and the genocide in Gaza.

We urge all journalists and media workers within German media institutions 

to reject being used as tools of propaganda by power, and to stand unequivocally for the truth and with their Palestinian colleagues reporting on the ground.

Berlin, 26.08.2025


The open letter was initiated by a group of journalists and media workers based in Berlin. For feedback or inquiries, please email openlettertogermanmedia@proton.me.

List with Signatories (Update: 267)

Lea Jungmann, Concerned Citizen

Pary El-Qalqili, Filmmaker

Anna Barakat-Goelnitz, Concerned Citizen

Emilia Tudose, Lawyer

Walid Abdelnour, Filmmaker

Jan Ralske, Film Director

Matthias Monroy, Editor

Caytana Lydia Hrachowy, Concerned Citizen

Nadine Simmer, Artist

Moritz Gauss, Concerned Citizen

Karim Eid-Sabbagh, Independent Researcher

Rainer Brömer, Historian of Science

Ramis Örlü, Professor from Norway

Nadine Essmat, Independent Photojournalist

Myrielle Busch, Concerned Citizen

Damon Taleghani, Writer

Eva Gutiérrez Alonso, Light Designer

Julian Daum, Journalist

Sebastian Damm, Civil Servant

Rami-Habib Eid-Sabbagh, Product Manager

Wael Eskandar, Independent Journalist

Mariam Aboughazi, Photographer and PhD Candidate

Fares Hamade, Filmmaker

Hüseyin Doğru, Journalist 

Nasrin Karimi, Lawyer 

Sunna Keles, Legal Advisor (juristische Referentin)

Nadija Samour, Lawyer

Miriam Schulte, Theatre Maker

Yasmeen Daher, Director- Febrayer Network for Independent Arab Media

Xénia Gomes Adães, Freelance (Photo-) Journalist 

Antonella Lis Vigilante, Care Worker

Christiane Schmidt, Filmmaker

Robert Grabosch, Lawyer

Valeria Tapia  D. Gauss  Singer, Concerned Citizen

Schirin Amir-Moazami,  Professor

Don Karl, Autor

Nahed Awwad, Filmmaker

Farah Maraq, Journalist and Media Researcher

David Fernandez, Musician

Nina Ogilvie, Lawyer

Kyra Levine, Freelance Media Worker

Sahar Barghouti, Concerned Citizen

Michele Faguet, Writer

El Solh Wahid, Sound Engineer

Helen Whittle, Journalist

Melissa Müller, Independent Journalist

Anosha Wahidi, Lawyer, Civil Servant, anti- Racism Avocat 

William Noah Glucroft, Journalist

Lisa Kaya Teacher

Danja Bergmann, Human

Anonymous, Musician

Ewa Wyrebska, PhD, Philosophy Scholar

Dr. Sylvie Tappert, Psychotherapy 

Lucy Thomas, NGO Consultantb

Teresa Zonno University Lecturer

Julian Breuer, Technician

Jasmine Rochereul, Student

Marcello Maschke, Civil Servant

Anonymous, Director of Photography

Aileen Phoenix, Musician

Martin Born, PhD Researcher

Philip Holzapfel, Author, MENA Advisor to Former EU High Representative Josep Borrell

Andrés López Ponce, Film Editor

Elad Lapidot, Professor for Hebraic Studies

Daniel Jess, Teacher

Dr. Benjamin Schuetze, Senior Researcher & Research Group Leader

Melanie Schweizer, Lawyer

Aliaa Adel, Head of Strategy

Montserrat Alvarez, Baker, Concerned Citizen

Louis Maurer, Healthcare worker

Wael Salam, Teacher

Rebecca van Es, Concerned Citizen

Kai Kappes, Former Journalist

Eva Bollerhoff, M.A.

Tamara Böhme, Concerned Citizen

Justus Könneker, Independent Journalist

Maria Klenner, Photojournalist

Sanela Kapetanović, Journalist 

Julia Bar-Tal, Farmer, Food Rights Defender

Chiara Wettmann, Photographer

Sofian Philip Naceur, Journalist

Anonymous, Islamic Studies (Islamwissenschaftler)

Viviane Schmidt, Student

Luise Hirner, Student

Henry Hakamaki, Educator, Editor, and Podcaster

Christoph Jahn, Linguist

Luisa Hahn, Midwife

Olivia Günter, Lawyer

Michele Tan, Ex-UN, Independent Peacebuilding Consultant

Cordula Reimann, Independent Process Facilitator & Mediator

Paul Ziegler, Human

Miray Demir, Children Rights (Kinderrechtswissenschaftlerin)

Dr. Martin Thiele-Schwez, Entrepreneur (Unternehmer)

Nicole Wolf, Academic

Philip Rizk, Filmmaker 

Tamara Kohl, Consultant

Anonymous, Psychologist

Åsa Sonjasdotter, Visual Artist

Raphaël Grisey, Filmmaker, Visual Artist, Researcher

Zahra Fayad, Concerned Citizen

Andrew McCormack. Graphic Designer

Najwa Sabra, Humanitarian Worker

Parwane Ehrari, Hotel General Manager

Noa Élie Vollmer, Student

Stefanie Baumann, Researcher

Dmitry Vilensky, Artist and Filmmaker

Thomas Klingenmeier, Process Manager

Miquel Ramos. Journalist

Atilla Massier, Concerned Citizen

Anne Klingenmeier, Concerned Citizen

Yasmin Bauer, Test Engineer

Dana Novanova IT consultant

Ann Kiernan Political Illustrator

Snežana Stanković, Researcher

Jeanine Atai; Literary Studies (Literaturwissenschaftlerin)

Claudia Rodriguez, Project Manager @ Siemens Healthineers

Hinnrk Glnitz, Lawyer

Olivia Günter, Lawyer

Miriam Lethmate, Concerned Citizen

Jakob Reimann, Journalist

Walid El Houri, Editor & Researcher

Naima Sebe, Filmmaker

Áine Hutchinson, Psychotherapist

Zarona Ismailova, Concerned Citizen

Kent Klich, Photographer

Volker Jacoby, Political Scientist

Sînziana Păltineanu, Writer

Pauline Plötz, Concerned Citizen

Omran Mohra, Concerned Citizen

Daniela Koerppen, Concerned Citizen

Stefan van der Burg, Sound Engineer

Prof Michael Barenboim, Musician

Bianca Maass, Concerned Citizen

Mounia Mälzer, Concerned Citizen

Minu Vogel, Theatre Educator and Master’s student in Transformation Studies

Melih Akyazililar, Director, Editor, Writer

Ralf Pleger, Filmmaker and Director

Sylvia Girgis, Concerned Citizen

Matthias Böhler, Artist

Iris Hefets, Psychoanalyst 

Gabriela Seith, Concerned Citizen

Nissrine Saraireh, Senior Business Operations Manager MBA

Udi Raz, PhD Candidate BGSMCS

Aurelia Kalisky, Senior Research Fellow at the Centre Marc Bloch Berlin

Athanasia Tsavala, Concerned Citizen

Sedige Ghadiri, Concerned Citizen

Jacob K. Langford, Scholar and Artist

Aline Palloure, Teacher

Dr. Lana Sirri, Researcher

Anna Margit, Architect

Milena Wernthal, Concerned Citizen

Laura Boser, Performer and Theatre Maker

Sonja Knüppel, Cultural and Social Worker

Alice van Caubergh, Concerned Citizen

HP Ruth Luschnat, Social Worker

Loreto Solís Germani, Journalist and Translator

Dona Asisi, Artist

Anna Lena Meisenberg, Artist

Leander Baer Lienert, Stage Lightening

Ruth Fruchtman, Writer

Yergalem Taffere, Artist

Friedrich Rosen, Concerned Citizen

Nina Pietropoli, People Ops Manager

Daniel Oppenheimer, Employee

Robert Sachse, Ingenieur

Dr. Brian Currid, Translator

Linh Tran, Social Worker

Rexane Rasmussen, Political Scientist

Lida Papakonstantinou, Concerned Citizen

Zorka Obrenić, Concerned Ctizen

Anika Gabler, Nurse

Sabine Bretz, Political Educator

Hatice Caliskan Nurse

Adam Ruprich,  Concerned Citizen

Eliana Ben David, Concerned citizen

Andreas Seelig, Physician

Dima Moghrabi, Concerned Citizen

Hartmut Vogel, Concerned Citizen

Dr. Mark Curran, Artist & Educator

Leila Boukarim, Author

Lola Risse, Student

Carolina Doran, Project Officer

Anonymous, Copywriter

Olaf Schnabel, Physician

İlknur Bahadir, Actress

Barbara Meier, Concerned Citizen

Nicolas Batthyany, Actor

Jerome Hillel Bark, Software Engineer

Martin Borgs, Ingenieur

Fabian Goldmann, Journalist

Ahmed Farouk M.Aly, Journalist & Translator

Anonymous, Care Worker

Aşkın-Hayat Doğan, Diversity Trainer

Sarah Lucey Teacher

Dr Daniel G.B. Weissmann, Pol. Comms Researcher

Nadin Klomke, Concerned Citizen

Mina Jawad, Writer

Diana Hodali, Freelance Media Worker

Gennaro Gervasio, University Professor

Roberta Pasini, Concerned Citizen

Alessia Cecchini, Consultant

Rossella Merullo, Concerned Citizen

Martina Altieri, Life Coach

Yasar Fattoom, Aid Worker

Anna Susi,  Language Teacher

Helena Klaßen, TraumaTherapist

Paola Stablum, Advisor

İdil Efe, Concerned Citizen

Yara Almunaizel, Concerned Citizen

Meltem Arsu, Editor

Rachela Tonta, Independent Researcher

Anonymous, Concerned Citizen

Mara Müller, Student

Nora Lawand, Concerned Citizen

Hanan, Concerned Citizen

Bettina Marx, Journalist and Writer

Dr. Tamar Amar-Dahl, Concerned Citizen

Abdullah Habhab, Concerned Citizen

Klara Maria Appel, Concerned Citizen

Anonymous, Grant Specialist

Ruairí Casey, Concerned Citizen

Hadas Emma Kedar, PhD student for Communication Studies, UHH

Marie Gollmann, Concerned Citizen

Ali Aykar, Actor

Raja Goltz, Social Worker and Researcher Artist

Alissa Fink, Freelancer

Prof. em. Dr. Fanny-Michaela Reisin, Professor

Anonymous, Lawyer

Nicole Tews, Nurse and Art Therapist

A. Hecht, Student

Theresa Schwenk, Student

Anonymous, Call Center Slave

Jakub Czernieski, Concerned Citizen

Zoë Claire Miller, Artist and Organizer

Anonymous, Student

Katya Sander, Professor

Nurit Hershkovitz ter Kuile, Concerned Citizen

Kurtis Sunday (Pen Name), Writer

Eyal Li, Researcher

Wieland Hoban, Composer, Translator and Author

Hadi Albalkhi, Software Developer

Mark Gerban, Concerned Citizen

Ahsan Atique, Ingenieur

Nevin Duran, Lawyer

Cenî Kurdish, Women’s Office for Peace

Sarafina Franziska Lovisa Paschold, Student

Evelyn Bittaye, Retired

Dr. René Wildangel, Independent Journalist

Moritz Zahn, Student 

Nils Vogel, Academic

Walid Aqleh, Senior Staff Software Engineer

Merle Annika Michaelsen, Gynecologist

Alexandra Fabitsch, Communications Specialist

Anonymous, Project Manager

Franziska Weber, Educator

Nora Geisler, Communications Consultant

Julian Brudereck, Concerned Citizen

Frauke Driessen Artist

Georg Auernheimer, Concerned Citizen

Manfred Jeub, Pastor and Schuldekan i. R.

Shirin Rahman, Concerned Citizen

Anonymous, Scientist

Grit Lemke, Author and Director

Caroline Haertel Director and Producer

Lucia Vannucchi, Filmmaker

Catalina Florez, Director

Julie Pfleiderer, Director

News from Berlin and Germany, 17th September 2025

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Spranger concerned about rise in knife violence

Berlin’s Senator for the Interior, Iris Spranger (SPD), is concerned about the increase in knife violence in the city. Recently, a 20-year-old man died from stab wounds following a violent altercation between two groups on 12 September at the Humboldt Forum. On the same day, a man in Reinickendorf was attacked with a knife, losing one eye. “The rise in violent crimes involving knives is worrying,” the politician told the German Press Agency on 15 September. According to her, such rise shows how important the measures she has initiated to combat knife violence are such as a knife ban on buses and trains in effect since July. Source: rbb

Homelessness in Berlin expected to increase by 60% by 2029

The Berlin Senate estimates that there were just under 26,000 homeless people in Berlin in 2022, the year when the city started officially recording and estimating the number of people who are in homeless shelters, hostels or emergency accommodation. The statistics do not include the so-called “hidden homelessness”, such as people living on the street. In 2025, that figure has increased to 53,600, so far, and it is expected to grow to 85,600 by 2029. The last two federal coalitions promised that they would attempt to end homelessness. Source: iamexpat

Against war and double standards

Several thousand people took part in a rally on 13 September at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin under the slogans “Stop the genocide in Gaza!” and “Peace instead of an arms race!” The organizers spoke of 22,000 participants, while the police claimed to have counted 12,000. Among those who called for the peace rally were BSW co-chair Sahra Wagenknecht, actor Dieter Hallervorden, and musicians Peter Maffay and Massiv. The audience was quite diverse. In addition to many participants from the traditional peace movement, this time there were numerous predominantly younger people with a migrant background. The chant “Free Palestine” could be heard repeatedly. Source: jungewelt

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Christoph Heusgen: “Germany could be convicted of aiding and abetting genocide in Gaza”

The former UN ambassador and Merkel advisor Christoph Heusgen is calling for a change of Germany’s policy on Israel. He says in an interview the time has come to recognize Palestine as a state. He points out that “if our neighbour France, with whom we want to be on the same page in foreign policy, as well as our close partner Great Britain and, most recently, Belgium, express their intention to recognize Palestine, then Germany should also address this issue”. He also believes such decision would have an impact on Israel, considering that “Israel’s security is a matter of German national interest – and that should remain so”. Source: berliner Zeitung

More right-wing violence than previously thought

Right-wing violence in Germany has already officially reached an alarming high. Nevertheless, the known extent, with an increase of 17% to officially 1,500 violent crimes in 2024, only reflects part of the actual attacks. This is shown by a analysis by the Association of Counseling Centers for Victims of Right-wing, Racist, and Anti-Semitic Violence. According to the report, German authorities do not record right-wing violence completely. The counseling centers are therefore calling for regular case comparisons between investigative authorities and victim counseling centers. “The real extent of right-wing violence is far greater than has been recorded to date”, they say. Source: taz

AfD triple share of vote in NRW

The results of the local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia suggest a stability that may yet prove deceptive. There was even a comforting feeling on election night. What a result! Almost a brief respite from nationwide polls: the CDU above 30%, the SPD above 20%, the AfD below 20%, the Greens comfortably in double digits… The West remains stable. Or does it? Not quite. The AfD tripled its share of the vote from the 2020 local elections. A growing number of people, even in the West, are turning away from the established parties and voting for the AfD. Source: n-tv

Heidi Reichinnek defends controversial post about Kirk

On Caren Miosga’s talk show, the faction leader Heidi Reichinnek (“die Linke”) justified her advisor’s controversial post, who had written “Oh no” next to a photo of the US activist Charlie Kirk on“X” – essentially saying, “Oh no, I don’t care.” Her colleague wanted to draw attention to a school massacre that had taken place at the same time and received little public attention. “It was cynical, but unfortunately fitting,” said Reichinnek. The post was deleted, and legal action is being taken against right-wing media reports on the matter. She remained adamant that it was possible to criticize Kirk and his ideology without expressing joy at his death. Source: berliner Zeitung